민법에서 권리론의 실현과 역할
The realization of the rights and role in the Civil Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the social life of human conduct and dispute resolution as the basis for an integral need to act is often referred to as being forced by the observance of State power in terms of features. However, the law has never been justified in order to win more than anything else is the content will have to be followed. The content and the presence of an object that does not have the legitimacy Act never is the name of the law illegal because of the risk to be sought by the Parties relevant to the status and importance should be emphasized because the civil law is a basic law of society to the system of the right. The civil law system of the right said. In addition, the issue of civil rights is the basis of compensation for damage is closely related to the law. This article explores these challenges and realize and understand the rights, as a matter of law from the perspective of civil law acts as such explores the modern. Civil law rights at the realization of the role is the subject of this study. However, concrete suggestions, rather than a conventional civil rights while cleaning up a discussion about the structure and try updating the settings you want. The right of changes and challenges for the tort law was given to the theoretical value.The concept of stare decisis by personalities are being reviewed and extended rights of pluralistic approaches, as observed in the area of tort law, tried to illuminate the principles of its composition of society. Rights within the framework of the development of the Act should be systematized to be Vista.
Abstract
In the social life of human conduct and dispute resolution as the basis for an integral need to act is often referred to as being forced by the observance of State power in terms of features. However, the law has never been justified in order to win more than anything else is the content will have to be followed. The content and the presence of an object that does not have the legitimacy Act never is the name of the law illegal because of the risk to be sought by the Parties relevant to the status and importance should be emphasized because the civil law is a basic law of society to the system of the right. The civil law system of the right said. In addition, the issue of civil rights is the basis of compensation for damage is closely related to the law. This article explores these challenges and realize and understand the rights, as a matter of law from the perspective of civil law acts as such explores the modern. Civil law rights at the realization of the role is the subject of this study. However, concrete suggestions, rather than a conventional civil rights while cleaning up a discussion about the structure and try updating the settings you want. The right of changes and challenges for the tort law was given to the theoretical value.The concept of stare decisis by personalities are being reviewed and extended rights of pluralistic approaches, as observed in the area of tort law, tried to illuminate the principles of its composition of society. Rights within the framework of the development of the Act should be systematized to be Vista.
참고문헌 (37)
- 姜大鈺, "危險責任論", 박사, 법학과, pp.1998
- 곽윤직, "민법주해(18)" (2005), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "채권총론" (2013), 박영사
- 권태상, "개인정보 보호와 인격권- 사법(私法) 측면에서의 검토 -", 법학논집, 17(4), pp.71~109 (2013), 법학연구소
- 김도균, "권리의 문법 : 도덕적 권리·인권·법적 권리" (2008), 박영사
- 김상용, "불법행위법" (1997), 법문사
- 김연미, "인간의 존엄성과 권리의 관계―칸트와 호펠드의 권리론을 중심으로―", 법철학연구, 9(2), pp.257~288 (2006), 한국법철학회
- 김현철, "형식적 권리론 ―권리의 개념구조에 대하여―", 법철학연구, 5(1), pp.115~140 (2002), 한국법철학회
- 김규완, "민법학강의(제10판)" (2011), 신조사(서울)
- 박종두, "물권적 청구권의 본질과 행사", 강남대학교논문집, 36 (2000)
- 윤석찬, "불법행위책임과 위험책임에서의 책임면제 및 책임제한 이론에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 51(4)통권 : 66, pp.105~129 (2010), 법학연구소
- 윤석찬, "민사법의 현대적 과제와 전망, 남강 서광민교수 정년기념논문집" (2007)
- 尹庸碩, "獨逸의 危險責任에 관한 연구 : 立法改革論議를 중심으로", 박사, 법학, pp.1989
- 윤태영, "競爭秩序 違反行爲에 대한 不法行爲責任", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.139~166 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
- 이종인, "불법행위법의 경제학" (2010), 한울
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2012), 홍문사
- 허명국, "채권침해에 의한 불법행위의 성립", 법과정책, 18(1), pp.407~435 (2012), 법과정책연구원
- 樫見由美子, "平井宜雄先生古稀記念 民法学における法と政策" (2007), 有斐閣
- 高橋和之, "現代人權論の基本構造", ジュリスト, (1288) (2005)
- 吉田克己, "市場秩序と民法 · 消費者", 現代消費者法, (1(創刊)) (2008)
- 吉田克己, "現代不法行爲法学の課題 : 被侵害利益の公共化をめぐって(ミニ · シソポジウム3現代不法行爲法学の課題 : 被侵害利益の公共化をめぐって)", 法の科學, (35) (2005)
- 吉田邦彦, "債權侵害論再考" (1991), 有斐閣
- 吉村 良一, "不法行為法" (2010), 有斐閣
- 藤岡康宏, "不法行爲と權利論 : 權利論の二元的構成に関する", 早稻田法学, 80(3) (2005)
- 藤岡康宏, "基本法学 5 責任" (1984), 岩波書店
- 藤岡康宏, "差止の訴に関する硏究序說 - その根據と權利(絶對權)について", 北大法学論集, 21(1) (1970)
- 藤岡廉宏, "民法理論と企業法制" (2009), 日本評論社
- 末川博, "民法学說百年史" (1999), 三省堂
- 山本敬三, "基本權の保護と不法行爲法の役割", 民法硏究, (5) (2008)
- 山本敬三, "不法行爲法学の再檢討と新たな展望", 法学論叢, 154(4 · 5 · 6) (2004)
- 山本顯治, "現代不法行爲法学における (厚生) 對 (權利) : 不法行爲法の目的論のために", 民商法雜誌, 133(6) (2006)
- 小粥太郞, "民法の世界" (2007), 商事法務
- 水林彪, "近代民法の本源的性格", 民法硏究, (5) (2008)
- 我妻栄, "現代法学全集 第37卷" (1931), 日本評論社
- 潮見佳男, "不法行爲法" (1999), 信山社
- 中村哲也, "民法学說百年史" (1999), 三省堂
- 広中俊雄, "民法綱要 第1卷 · 總論" (2006), 創文堂