반인권적 범죄의 법적 성질에 관한 연구
The Legal Nature of Crimes against Humanit
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
All states should respect basic human rights to the highest degree which the constitution of a stateensures. In particular, essential contents about the basic human rights should not violate under anycircumstances. However, government authorities or its members who have bigger power for the period ofdictatorship in the past had ever committed crimes against humanity against her people. Crimes against humanity are crimes to kill or torture her people in the course of excising governmentpower without any legal ground that government authorities or its members of the government authoritieshave. Crimes against humanity can be also included these infringed acts abovementioned which had beenconcealed and fabricated systematically. These crimes were generally committed for a period of dictatorshipin the past as a sort of infringing people’s human rights seriously. So, there is an issue raised whichmost of the criminal actors committed above-mentioned crimes can not punish due to be applied theprinciple of the statute of limitation. If so, what shall we do? In order to punish the criminal actors which crimes against humanity hadcommitted, the statute of limitation on prosecution in the code of criminal procedure should be amendedbecause of two reasons. One is that it is against the purpose of legislation about the mechanism of thestatute of limitation on prosecution that a state that has responsibilities to ensure her people’s humanrights has exempted their grave crimes against her people. The other is that taking preference of publicinterest over the protection of reliance in accordance with individual profit can be coincided with criminaljustice and legal stability.
Abstract
All states should respect basic human rights to the highest degree which the constitution of a stateensures. In particular, essential contents about the basic human rights should not violate under anycircumstances. However, government authorities or its members who have bigger power for the period ofdictatorship in the past had ever committed crimes against humanity against her people. Crimes against humanity are crimes to kill or torture her people in the course of excising governmentpower without any legal ground that government authorities or its members of the government authoritieshave. Crimes against humanity can be also included these infringed acts abovementioned which had beenconcealed and fabricated systematically. These crimes were generally committed for a period of dictatorshipin the past as a sort of infringing people’s human rights seriously. So, there is an issue raised whichmost of the criminal actors committed above-mentioned crimes can not punish due to be applied theprinciple of the statute of limitation. If so, what shall we do? In order to punish the criminal actors which crimes against humanity hadcommitted, the statute of limitation on prosecution in the code of criminal procedure should be amendedbecause of two reasons. One is that it is against the purpose of legislation about the mechanism of thestatute of limitation on prosecution that a state that has responsibilities to ensure her people’s humanrights has exempted their grave crimes against her people. The other is that taking preference of publicinterest over the protection of reliance in accordance with individual profit can be coincided with criminaljustice and legal stability.
참고문헌 (53)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2010), 법문사
- 김일수, "형법총론" (2007), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2009), 홍문사
- 배종대, "신형사소송법" (2009), 홍문사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법 제2판" (2009), 법문사
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2011), 박영사
- 강동범, "제2판" (2013), 신조사
- 최종고, "법철학" (2007), 박영사
- 김상겸, "공소시효의 배제와 연장에 관한 헌법적 고찰", 헌법학연구, 12(3), pp.339~361 (2006), 한국헌법학회
- 김환수, "Klaus Volk의 독일 형사소송법" (2009), 박영사
- 대한변호사협회, "2012 인권보고서" (2013), 후디자인
- 디텔름 클레스제브시키, "독일 형사소송법" (2012), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 문봉규, "공무원의 반인권적 범죄에 대한 공소시효 연장·배제에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 32, pp.431~452 (2011), 부설법학연구소
- 문봉규, "수배제도의 합리적인 운영방안에 관한 연구: 수배자의 인권침해방지를 중심으로", 박사, 형사법, pp.2010
- 박성민, "객관의무의 구체화와 검사의 권한통제", 형사법연구, 24(3), pp.237~260 (2012), 한국형사법학회
- 박찬운, "반인도적 범죄의 국내적 수용", 인권과평화, 1(1) (2000)
- 변종필, "반인도적· 국가적 범죄와 공소시효", 비교형사법연구, 8(1(2)), pp.643~668 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 윤석찬, "國家機關에 의한 人權侵害와 民事責任", 인권과 정의, (354), pp.153~173 (2006), 대한변호사협회
- 윤수영, "반인도적 국가범죄에 대한 공소시효", 본, 18 (2003)
- 이만종, "상관의 위법성에 대한 고찰", 논문집, 51 (2003)
- 이완규, "검사의 지위와 객관의무: 대법원 2002. 2. 22, 2001다23447", 저스티스, 통권 : 73 (2003)
- 이용식, "회복적 정의와 형사사법 정의 - 두 정의의 ‘절충’은 가능한 것인가?", 동아법학, (54), pp.417~448 (2012), 법학연구소
- 이장희, "현대 국제조약집" (2005), 아사연
- 이호중, "반인권적 국가범죄의 공소시효배제와 소급효", 민주법학, (30), pp.107~131 (2006), 민주주의법학연구회
- 이훈동, "태국에서의 회복적사법", 외법논집, (28), pp.39~64 (2007), 법학연구소
- 장영수, "공소시효의 인권법적 문제점에 관한 헌법적 검토", 고려법학, (53), pp.111~130 (2009), 법학연구원
- 정승윤, "‘진실·화해를 위한 과거사정리 기본법’상 인권침해사건에서 나타난 주요 법적 쟁점", 법학논총, 31(3), pp.673~703 (2011), 법학연구소
- 정진연, "공소시효", 법학논총, 13 (2003)
- 조광훈, "수사기관의 객관의무에 관한 연구", 법조, 54(5), pp.257~292 (2005), 법조협회
- 조국, "반인권적 국가범죄의 공소시효의 정지 배제와 소급효금지의 원칙", 형사법연구, (17), pp.1~18 (2002), 한국형사법학회
- 진실⋅화해를위한과거사정리위원회, "진실화해위원회 종합보고서 Ⅰ -위원회의 연혁과활동 종합권고" (2010), 삼영문화인쇄사
- 진실⋅화해를위한과거사정리위원회, "진실화해위원회 종합보고서 Ⅳ -인권침해사건" (2010), 삼영문화인쇄사
- 하태영, "공소시효제도의 문제점과 개정방향", 비교형사법연구, 4(1)통권 : 6 (2002)
- Priscilla B. Hayner, "국가폭력과 세계의 진실위원회" (2008), 역사비평사
- "Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Trial of the Major War Criminals, appended to Agreemant for the Prosecution and Punishment of Major War Criminals of the European Axis, Aug. 8, 1945, 59Stat. 1544, UNTS 279, as amended, Protocol to Agreement and Charter, Oct. 6, 1945", ~ (1945)
- Christine Van den Wyngaert, "International Criminal Law : A collection of International and European Instruments" (2000), Kluwer Law International
- Hassemer, "Theorie und Soziologie des" (1980), Europäische Verlagsanstalt
- Rome State of the International Criminal Court, , ~, pp.U.N. Doc. A (1998), Conf. 183[DOI]
- Compensation and Rehabilitation for Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Final Report, "United Nations Commission on Human Rights Study concerning the Right to Restitution", ~, pp.Theo van Boven, rapporteur, UN Doc. E (1993), CN.4[DOI]
- "Canada Criminal Code, 3.76", ~
- "Strafprozeβordnung(StPo)", ~
- "5⋅18 민주화운동등에 관한 특별법", ~
- "검찰청법", ~
- "국가인권위원회법", ~
- "국제형사재판소규정", ~
- "성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법", ~
- "아동⋅청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률", ~
- "헌정질서파괴범죄의 공소시효 등에 관한 특례법", ~
- "형사보상 및 명예회복에 관한 법률", ~
- "형사소송법", ~