본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Empirical Study on Growth Management Policy Implementation

이정호
국가정책연구소 (Institute of Public Policy & Administration)|2022.03|국가정책연구 (Public Policy Review)|제36권 제1호|pp. 127-152|DOI 10.17327/ippa.2022.36.1.006

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Local Governments지방정부스마트 성장성장관리정책Growth Management PolicySmart Growth
주제분류정책학

초록

The primary goal of this article is to empirically examine what factors drive local governments to more actively implement growth management policy. To answer this research question, this study chose Florida counties, where local governments—counties and cities—voluntarily implement growth management policy. That indicates that a wide variation in growth management policy implementation appears among Florida’s local governments. Namely, some counties in Florida more actively implement growth management policy while others less actively do. Utilizing a statistical technique, this article tests six hypotheses, which were created by the interest group model and five county characteristics, to empirically explore this variation shown in the local growth management policy implementation. The analyzed results prove that counties with 1) many pro-growth management policy interest groups, 2) many residents with high economic level, and 3) many residents supporting the Democratic Party more actively implement growth management policy, However, the analyzed results reveal that counties with many minorities are less likely to implement growth management policy.

Abstract

The primary goal of this article is to empirically examine what factors drive local governments to more actively implement growth management policy. To answer this research question, this study chose Florida counties, where local governments—counties and cities—voluntarily implement growth management policy. That indicates that a wide variation in growth management policy implementation appears among Florida’s local governments. Namely, some counties in Florida more actively implement growth management policy while others less actively do. Utilizing a statistical technique, this article tests six hypotheses, which were created by the interest group model and five county characteristics, to empirically explore this variation shown in the local growth management policy implementation. The analyzed results prove that counties with 1) many pro-growth management policy interest groups, 2) many residents with high economic level, and 3) many residents supporting the Democratic Party more actively implement growth management policy, However, the analyzed results reveal that counties with many minorities are less likely to implement growth management policy.

참고문헌 (83)

  1. Anthony, J., "Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl", Urban Affairs Review, 39(3), pp.376~397 (2004)
  2. Anthony, J., "State growth management and urban sprawl reduction : Lessons from Florida", Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 143(4) (2017)
  3. Arrant, T., "Florida county government guide", pp.123~138 (2014)
  4. Baldassare, M., "Changing sources of suburban support for local growth controls", Urban Studies, 33(3), pp.459~471 (1996)
  5. Benton, J. E., "Encylopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy", pp.261~266 (2003)
  6. Ben-Zadok, E., "Policy changes through decision models : planning and implementing Florida growth management, 1970–2010", International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 4(2), pp.198~218 (2012)
  7. Berry, F. S., "State lottery adoptions as policy innovations", American Political Science Review, 84(2), pp.395~413 (1990)
  8. Boatright, R. G., "Interest groups and campaign finance reform in the United States and Canada" (2011), University of Michigan Press
  9. Briffault, R., "Home rule for the twenty-first century", Urban Lawyer, 36(2), pp.253~272 (2004)
  10. Brueckner, J. K., "Infrastructure financing and urban development : The economics of impact fees", Journal of Public Economics, 66(3), pp.383~407 (1997)
  11. Bushouse, B. K., "Governance structures : Using IAD to understand variation in service delivery for club goods with information asymmetry", Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), pp.105~119 (2011)
  12. Burge, G. S., "Can development impact fees help mitigate urban sprawl", Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(3), pp.235~248 (2013)
  13. "Florida population boom boosts its national political clout" (2021)[URL]
  14. Chapin, T. S., "Growth Management in Florida", pp.119~140 (2017), Routledge
  15. Chari, R., "Regulating lobbying : A global comparison" (2010), Manchester University Press
  16. Clark, T. N., "Urban innovations: Creative strategies for turbulent times", pp.105~145 (1994)
  17. Clingermayer, J. C., "Institutional constraints and policy choice" (2001), State University of New York Press
  18. Cox, K., "Housing tenure and neighborhood activism", Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, pp.107~129 (1982)
  19. DeGrove, J., "Land, growth and politics" (1984), Planners Press
  20. DeGrove, J., "Planning policy and politics : Smart growth and the states" (2005), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  21. Diaz, D., "Fiscal stress and growth management effort in Wisconsin cities, villages, and towns", State and Local Government Review, 33(1), pp.7~22 (2001)
  22. Dierwechter, Y., "Urban growth management and tis discontents: Promises practices, and geopolitics in U.S. city-regions" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  23. Dryzek, J. S., "Democracy in capitalist times" (1996), Oxford University Press
  24. Feiock, R. C., "Politics, institutions and local land-use regulation", Urban Studies, 41(2), pp.363~375 (2004)
  25. Feiock, R. C., "Policy instrument choices for growth management and land use regulation", Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), pp.461~480 (2008)
  26. Fischel, W., "The homevoter hypothesis" (2001), Harvard University Press
  27. Fleischmann, A., "Citizens, development interests, and local land-Use Regulation", Journal of Politics, 52(3), pp.838~853 (1990)
  28. Gerber, E. R., "Land use policy, institutional design, and the responsiveness of representative government", Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association (2003)
  29. Gilder, G. F., "Wealth and poverty" (1981), Basic Books, Inc
  30. Gujarati, D. N., "Basic econometrics" (2003), McGraw-Hill Higher Education
  31. Gyourko, J., "Impact fees, exclusionary zoning, and the density of new development", Journal of Urban Economics, 30(2), pp.242~256 (1991)
  32. Hamin, E. M., "Implementing growth management : The community preservation act", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), pp.53~65 (2006)
  33. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2010), Prentice Hall
  34. Helsley, R. W., "Strategic growth controls", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(4), pp.435~460 (1995)
  35. Howell-Moroney, M., "What are the determinants of open-space ballot measures? An extension of the research", Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), pp.169~179 (2004)
  36. Howell-Moroney, M., "Studying the effects of the intensity of US state growth management approaches on land development outcomes", Urban Studies, 44(11), pp.2163~2178 (2007)
  37. Howell-Moroney, M., "A mixed method look at state growth management policy", American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), pp.339~361 (2008)
  38. Ingram, G. K., "Smart growth policies : An evaluation of programs and outcomes" (2009), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  39. Ingram, H., "Theories of the policy process", pp.107~123 (2007), Westview Press
  40. Jewett, A., "Florida county government guide", pp.5~23 (2014)
  41. Johnston, R. A., "The politics of local growth control", Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), pp.427~439 (1980)
  42. Kelly, E. D., "Managing community growth : Policies, techniques, and impacts" (1993), Prager Press
  43. Kemp, R. L., "How American Governments Work: A Handbook of City, County, Regional, State, and Federal Operations" (2007), McFarland
  44. Kolo, J., "Practical issues in adopting local impact fees", State and Local Government Review, 25(3), pp.197~206 (1993)
  45. Lee, J., "The mechanism of state charter school policy adoption : The case of American states", International Journal of Public Administration, 37(1), pp.20~34 (2014)
  46. 이세진, "The Effects of State Smart Growth Management and Local Contexts on Local Open Space Preservation", Journal of Policy Studies, 28(1), pp.17~41 (2013), 서울대학교행정대학원
  47. Levy, T., "Charter schools legislation and the element of race", Western Journal of Black Studies, 34(1), pp.43~52 (2010)
  48. Liou, K. T., "The effect of the Growth Management Act on local comprehensive planning expenditures: the South Florida experience", Public Administration Review, pp.239~244 (1994)
  49. Logan, J. R., "Urban fortunes: The political economy of place" (1987), University of California Press
  50. Logan, J. R., "The character and consequences of growth regimes : An assessment of 20 years of research", Urban Affairs Review, 32(5), pp.603~630 (1997)
  51. Loomis, B. A., "Interest group politics", pp.1~36 (2006), Congressional Quarterly Press
  52. Lubell, M., "Political institutions and conservation by local governments", Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), pp.706~729 (2005)
  53. Lubell, M., "Local institutions and the politics of urban growth", American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), pp.649~665 (2009)
  54. Lubell, M., "Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions", American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), pp.148~163 (2002)
  55. Mahood, H. R., "Interest groups in American national politics : An overview" (2000), Prentice Hall
  56. Marando, V. L., "Counties as local governments : Research issues and questions", Journal of Urban Affairs, 13(1), pp.45~53 (1991)
  57. Mintrom, M., "Policy entrepreneurs and school choice" (2000), Georgetown University Press
  58. Mohamed, R., "Who would pay for rural open space preservation and inner-city redevelopment? Identifying support for policies that can contribute to regional land use governance", Urban Studies, 45(13), pp.2783~2803 (2008)
  59. Morgan, G. A., "IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation" (2013), Routledge
  60. Mullen, "Impact Fees", pp.113~125 (2015), Routledge
  61. Navarro, P., "Growth controls : Policy analysis for the second generation", Policy Sciences, 24(2), pp.127~152 (1991)
  62. Nownes, A. J., "Pressure and power: Organized interests in American politics" (2001), Houghton Mifflin
  63. Nownes, A. J., "Interest group politics", pp.108~129 (2006), Congressional Quarterly Press
  64. Ostrom, E., "Theories of the policy process", pp.21~64 (2007), Westview
  65. Ostrom, E., "Background on the institutional analysis and development framework", Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), pp.7~27 (2011)
  66. "The New Feudalism: Why states must repeal growth-management laws" (2016)[URL]
  67. Pelham, T. G., "Growth Management in Florida", pp.7~19 (2017), Routledge
  68. Pink-Harper, S. A., "Does county form of government impact economic growth and development trends? The case of four states", The American Review of Public Administration, 48(3), pp.245~259 (2018)
  69. Powell, D. L., "Growth management : Florida's past as prologue for the future", Florida State University Law Reveiw, 28(2), pp.519~543 (2000)
  70. "Florida’s population growth tops in immigration, immigration" (2021)[URL]
  71. Protash, W., "Growth policies and community satisfaction : a test and modification of Logan’s Theory", Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, pp.397~412 (1983)
  72. Ramirez, E. E., "Local political institutions and smart growth : An empirical study of the politics of compact development", Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), pp.218~246 (2009)
  73. Remler, D. K., "Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation" (2014), Sage Publications, Inc
  74. Rhodes, R. M., "Florida's growth management odyssey : Revolution, evolution, devolution, resolution", Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy, 4(1), pp.56~69 (2020)
  75. Sabatier, P., "Theories of the policy process", pp.169~200 (2007), Westview
  76. Sanchez, T. W., "Growth Management in Florida", pp.85~99 (2017), Routledge
  77. Steel, B., "Growth management policy and county government : Correlates of policy adoption across the United States", State and Local Government Review, 32(1), pp.7~19 (2000)
  78. Stoddard, C., "The political economy of school choice : Support for charter schools across states and school districts", Journal of Urban Economics, 62(1), pp.27~54 (2007)
  79. Stroud, N., "A history and new turns in Florida’s growth management reform", J. MARSHALL L. REV, 45(2), pp.397~415 (2012)
  80. Teske, P., "Interests and institutions on state regulation", American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), pp.139~154 (1991)
  81. Teske, P., "The information gap", Review of Policy Research, 23(5), pp.969~981 (2006)
  82. "International visitors are returning to Florida, leading to a tourism surge" (2021)[URL]
  83. Wagner, W. E., "Using IBM SPSS statistics for research methods and social science statistics" (2013), Sage Publications, Inc

관련 논문AI추천

Interest Groups, County Characteristics, and Local Growth Management Policy Instruments이정호서울대학교행정대학원 · Journal of Policy Studies2015 · 제30권 제3호The Effects of State Smart Growth Management and Local Contexts on Local Open Space Preservation이세진서울대학교행정대학원 · Journal of Policy Studies2013 · 제28권 제1호Politics, Institutions and Comprehensive Planning in Florida Cities: A Spatial Lag Model강인성, Richard C. Feiock(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2010 · 제24권 제1호Factor Affecting The Adoption of Tax Incentive Programs Related to Economic Development : The Case of Florida Counties박상철, 윤태섭, 이건형(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2012 · 제26권 제1호Residential Development and Hierarchical Governance: Multifamily Housing and Multilevel Analysis곽창규, 권성욱, 박상철서울대학교행정대학원 · Journal of Policy Studies2012 · 제27권 제2호Socioeconomic Factors and Development Impact Fees이정호한국공공관리학회 · 한국공공관리학보2018 · 제32권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

광역­기초 역할을 고려한 평생학습 정책 발전방안 연구: 경상북도 도민행복대학 사례를 중심으로임태경, 이재용pp. 1-29텍스트 마이닝을 활용한 금융업 세부 업종간 ESG 보고서 비교 분석박수빈, 이용규pp. 31-56데이터･정보 관련 규제 합리화 방안 연구: 편익-위험평가를 중심으로심우현, 원소연pp. 57-78사드(THAAD) 배치 정책형성 과정에 관한 연구반정민, 정홍상pp. 79-100비용분석과 원가산정 환류를 통한 국방획득사업 비용분석의 신뢰성 향상방안 연구곽시우, 강석중pp. 101-125
원문 보기