The Effects of State Smart Growth Management and Local Contexts on Local Open Space Preservation
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores the effects of state smart growth management and local contextual factors—in particular, aspects of hierarchical governance and the political market framework—on local open space preservation. It takes into account state intervention in local affairs, including state requirements for local planning practices in general and for open space preservation in particular. It also tests local contextual factors such as political and informal institutions,interest groups, and community and physical characteristics, using hierarchical linear modeling. The findings suggest that counties are more likely to preserve open space when the state government strongly intervenes in local planning practices. The county manager form of government and high population density are negatively associated with open space preservation, while high demands for growth control and the presence of active environmental interest groups are positively associated with it.
Abstract
This study explores the effects of state smart growth management and local contextual factors—in particular, aspects of hierarchical governance and the political market framework—on local open space preservation. It takes into account state intervention in local affairs, including state requirements for local planning practices in general and for open space preservation in particular. It also tests local contextual factors such as political and informal institutions,interest groups, and community and physical characteristics, using hierarchical linear modeling. The findings suggest that counties are more likely to preserve open space when the state government strongly intervenes in local planning practices. The county manager form of government and high population density are negatively associated with open space preservation, while high demands for growth control and the presence of active environmental interest groups are positively associated with it.
참고문헌 (61)
- Anglin, R., "Diminishing utility: Effects on citizen preferences for local growth", Urban Affairs Quarterly, 25, pp.684~696 (1990)
- Anthony, J., "Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl?", Urban Affairs Review, 39(3), pp.376~397 (2004)
- Anthony, J., "Exploring causes of smart growth policy adoption: Many challenges persist", Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), pp.1374~1377 (2008)
- Baldassare, M., "Growth controls, population growth, and community satisfaction", American Sociological Review, 47, pp.339~346 (1982)
- Bolen, E., "Smart growth: State by state" (2001), University of California College of the Law
- Bollens, S., "State growth management: Inter-governmental frameworks and policy objectives", Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, pp.454~466 (1992)
- Bosselman, F. P., "The quiet revolution in land use control" (1971), Council on Environmental Quality and Council of State Governments
- Brent, S. S., "Growth management policy and county government:Correlates of policy adoption across the United States", State and Local Government Review, 32(7), pp.7~19 (2000)
- Burt, R. S., "Structural holes: The social structure of competition" (1992), Harvard University Press
- Burt, R. S., "The network structure of social capital, In Research in organizational behavior", pp.345~423 (2000), JAI Press
- Carruthers, J. I., "The impacts of state growth management programmes: A comparative analysis", Urban Studies, 39(11), pp.1959~1982 (2002)
- Clingermayer, J. C., "Institutional constraints and local policy choices: An exploration of local governance" (2001), State University of New York Press
- Cooter, R., "The strategic constitution" (2000), Princeton University Press
- Denzau, A., "Recent developments in zoning and property rights. Forward: The political economy of land use regulation", Urban Law Annual, 23, pp.385~405 (1982)
- DeSantis, V, "The impact of political structures on public policies in American counties", Public Administration Review, 54(3), pp.291~295 (1994)
- Downs, A., "Some realities about sprawl and urban decline", Housing Policy Debate, 10, pp.955~974 (1999)
- Dunlap, R. E., "American environmentalism" (1992), Taylor and Francis
- Erickson, D. L., "Metro-green: Connecting open space in North American cities" (2006), Island Press
- Feiock, R. C., "The political economy of growth management", American Politics Quarterly, 22, pp.208~220 (1994)
- Feiock, R. C., "Politics, governance, and the complexity of local land use regulation", Urban Studies, 41(2), pp.363~377 (2003)
- Gale, D., "Eight state sponsored growth management programs—A comparative analysis", Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, pp.425~439 (1992)
- Gillham, O., "The limitless city: A primer on the urban sprawl debate" (2002), Island Press
- Green, G. P., "Local dependency, land use attitudes, and economic development: Comparison between seasonal and permanent residents", Rural Sociology, 61(3), pp.427~445 (1996)
- Healy, R. G., "Land use and the states" (1979), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Howell-Moroney, M., "Community characteristics, open space preservation and regionalism: Is there a connection?", Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1), pp.109~118 (2004)
- Howell-Moroney, M., "Studying the effects of the intensity of US state growth management approaches on land development outcomes", Urban Studies, 44(11), pp.2163~2178 (2007)
- Kelly, E. D., "Managing community growth: Policies, techniques, and impacts" (1994), Praeger Press
- Ketcham, P., "Managing growth to promote affordable housing:Revisiting Oregon’s Goal 10" (1991), 1000 Friends of Oregon
- Kline, J. D., "Comparing states with and without growth management: Analysis based on indicators with policy implications comment", Land Use Policy, 17, pp.349~355 (2000)
- Koestler, A., "The tree and the candle, In Unity through diversity, part 1", pp.287~314 (1973), Gordon and Breach Science Publishers
- Lee, S. J., "Environmental local public goods: Open space preservation and multilevel analysis", 박사, pp.2011
- Lewis, P., "Cities under pressure: Local growth controls and residential development policy" (2002), Public Policy Institute of California
- Lin, N., "Network theory of social capital, In Handbook of social capital" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Logan, J., "Urban fortunes: The political economy of place" (1987), University of California Press
- Lubell, M., "Political institutions and conservation by local governments", Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), pp.706~729 (2005)
- Maser, S., "The effects of zoning and externalities on the price of land: An empirical analysis of Monroe County, NY", Journal of Law and Economics, 20, pp.111~132 (1977)
- Matsumoto, Y., "Local land conservation efforts: A study of selected county programs in the United States" (2005), University of Washington
- McCabe, B. C., "Nested levels of institutions: State rules and city property taxes", Urban Affairs Review, 40(5), pp.634~654 (2005)
- McQueen, M., "Land conservation financing" (2003), Island Press
- Morgan, D., "Changing the form of county government: Effects on revenue and expenditure policy", Public Administration Review, 59(4), pp.315~324 (1999)
- Mumford, K., "County open space protection: A survey of the current state of open space protection efforts by America’s counties" (2004), National Center for the Survey of Counties
- Nalbandian, J., "The contemporary role of city managers", American Review of Public Administration, 19, pp.261~277 (1989)
- Navarro, P., "Growth controls: Policy analysis for the second generation", Policy Sciences, 24, pp.127~152 (1991)
- Nelson, A. C., "Comparing states with and without growth management regulations based on indicators with policy implications", Land Use Policy, 16, pp.121~127 (1999)
- Nelson, A. C., "The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence, In Growth management and affordable housing", pp.117~157 (2004), Brookings Institution Press
- Nolon, J. R., "Comparative land use law and global sustainable development" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- O’Connell, L., "The impact of local supporters on smart growth policy adoption", Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3), pp.281~291 (2009)
- Osborne, J. W, "Advantages of hierarchical linear modeling", Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(1) (2000)
- Ostrom, E., "Governing the commons" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Ostrom, E., "Understanding institutional diversity" (2005), Princeton University Press
- 박상철, "Residential Development and Hierarchical Governance: Multifamily Housing and Multilevel Analysis", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 27(2), pp.1~22 (2012), 서울대학교행정대학원[DOI]
- Park, S.-C., "Participants in local zoning for multifamily housing development and decision delay: Transaction cost and hierarchical governance", International Journal of Public Administration
- Press, D., "Saving open space: The politics of local preservation in California" (2002), University of California Press
- Press, D., "Who votes for natural resources in California?", Society and Natural Resources, 16(9), pp.835~846 (2003)
- Protash, W., "Growth policies and community status", Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, pp.397~412 (1983)
- Raudenbush, S. W., "Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods" (2002), Sage
- Romero, F., "Saving open spaces: Determinants of 1998 and 1999 antisprawl ballot measures", Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), pp.341~352 (2002)
- Squires, G., "Urban sprawl-causes, consequences and policy responses" (2002), Urban Institute
- Steinacker, A., "Economic restructuring in U.S. cities, suburbs, and non-metropolitan areas, 1977-1992", Urban Affairs Review (1992)
- Thum, T. M., "Hierarchical linear models for multivariate outcomes", Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(1), pp.77~108 (1997)
- Weitz, J., "From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960 to 1999", Journal of Planning Literature, 14, pp.267~338 (1999)
