Interest Groups, County Characteristics, and Local Growth Management Policy Instruments
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The primary intent of this study is to investigate what factors drive local governments to implement growth management policy instruments. To answer this research question, this study chose Colorado counties, where local governments voluntarily adopt and implement growth management policy instruments. That means that a wide variation in growth management policy instrument implementation appears among Colorado’s local governments. That is to say, some counties more actively implement growth management policy instruments while the rest of counties do not. Utilizing a statistical tool, this article tests seven hypotheses based on the interest group model and county characteristics to empirically explicate this uneven implementation phenomenon of growth management policy instruments across Colorado. The analyzed results prove that counties with many anti-growth management policy interest groups are less likely to implement growth management policy instruments. In addition, the analyzed results demonstrate both that counties earning more income from tourism and counties with highly educated residents are more likely to implement growth management policy instruments, while counties supporting the Democratic Party are less likely to implement growth management policy instruments.
Abstract
The primary intent of this study is to investigate what factors drive local governments to implement growth management policy instruments. To answer this research question, this study chose Colorado counties, where local governments voluntarily adopt and implement growth management policy instruments. That means that a wide variation in growth management policy instrument implementation appears among Colorado’s local governments. That is to say, some counties more actively implement growth management policy instruments while the rest of counties do not. Utilizing a statistical tool, this article tests seven hypotheses based on the interest group model and county characteristics to empirically explicate this uneven implementation phenomenon of growth management policy instruments across Colorado. The analyzed results prove that counties with many anti-growth management policy interest groups are less likely to implement growth management policy instruments. In addition, the analyzed results demonstrate both that counties earning more income from tourism and counties with highly educated residents are more likely to implement growth management policy instruments, while counties supporting the Democratic Party are less likely to implement growth management policy instruments.
참고문헌 (57)
- Anthony, J, "Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl?", Urban Affairs Review, 39(3), pp.376~397 (2004)
- Baldassare, M., "Changing sources of suburban support for local growth controls", Urban Studies, 33(3), pp.459~471 (1996)
- Berry, F. S., "State lottery adoptions as policy innovations", American Political Science Review, 84(2), pp.395~413 (1990)
- Bushouse, B. K., "Governance structures: Using IAD to understand variation in service delivery for club goods with information asymmetry", Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), pp.105~119 (2011)
- Chari, R, "Regulating lobbying: A global comparison" (2010), Manchester University Press
- Clingermayer, J. C., "Institutional constraints and policy choice" (2001), State University of New York Press
- Cox, K., "Housing tenure and neighborhood activism", Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, pp.107~129 (1982)
- Cronin, T. E., "Colorado politics and government: Governing the centennial state" (1993), University of Nebraska Press
- DeGrove, J., "Land, growth and politics" (1984), Planners Press
- DeGrove, J., "Planning policy and politics: Smart growth and the states" (2005), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
- Diaz, D., "Fiscal stress and growth management effort in Wisconsin cities, villages, and towns", State and Local Government Review, 33(1), pp.7~22 (2001)
- Dierwechter, Y., "Urban growth management and tis discontents: Promises practices, and geopolitics in U.S. city-regions" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
- Dowall, D., "An examination of population-growth-managing communities", Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), pp.414~427 (1980)
- Feiock, R. C., "Politics, institutions and local land-use regulation", Urban Studies, 41(2), pp.363~375 (2004)
- Feiock, R. C., "Form of government, administrative organization, and local economic development policy", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(1), pp.29~49 (2000)
- Feiock, R. C., "Policy instrument choices for growth management and land use regulation", Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), pp.461~480 (2008)
- Fischel, W., "The homevoter hypothesis" (2001), Harvard University Press
- Fleischmann, A., "Citizens, development interests, and local land-Use Regulation", Journal of Politics, 52(3), pp.838~853 (1990)
- Gerber, E. R., "Land use policy, institutional design, and the responsiveness of representative government", Paper presented at the 2003Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association (2003)
- Gujarati, D. N., "Basic econometrics" (2003), McGraw-Hill Higher Education
- Hamin, E. M., "Implementing growth management : The community preservation act", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), pp.53~65 (2006)
- Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2010), Prentice Hall
- Howell-Moroney, M., "What are the determinants of open-space ballot measures? An extension of the research", Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), pp.169~179 (2004)
- Howell-Moroney, M., "Studying the effects of the intensity of US state growth management approaches on land development outcomes", Urban Studies, 44(11), pp.2163~2178 (2007)
- Howell-Moroney, M., "A mixed method look at state growth management policy", American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), pp.339~361 (2008)
- Ingram, G. K., "Smart growth policies: An evaluation of programs and outcomes" (2009), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
- Kelly, E. D., "Managing community growth: Policies, techniques, and impacts" (1993), Prager Press
- Lee, J., "The mechanism of state charter school policy adoption: The case of American states", International Journal of Public Administration, 37(1), pp.20~34 (2014)
- 이세진, "The Effects of State Smart Growth Management and Local Contexts on Local Open Space Preservation", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 28(1), pp.17~41 (2013), 서울대학교행정대학원
- Logan, J. R., "Urban fortunes: The political economy of place" (1987), University of California Press
- Loomis, B. A., "Interest group politics", pp.1~36 (2006), Congressional Quarterly Press
- Lubell, M., "Political institutions and conservation by local governments", Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), pp.706~729 (2005)
- Mahood, H. R., "Interest groups in American national politics: An overview" (2000), Prentice Hall
- Mazmanian, D. A., "A multivariate model of public policymaking", American Journal of Political Science, 24(3), pp.439~468 (1980)
- Mintrom, M., "Policy entrepreneurs and school choice" (2000), Georgetown University Press
- Mohamed, R., "Who would pay for rural open space preservation and inner-city redevelopment? Identifying support for policies that can contribute to regional land use governance", Urban Studies, 45(13), pp.2783~2803 (2008)
- Navarro, P., "Growth controls : Policy analysis for the second generation", Policy Sciences, 24(2), pp.127~152 (1991)
- Nownes, A. J., "Pressure and power: Organized interests in American politics" (2001), Houghton Mifflin
- Nownes, A. J., "Interest group politics", pp.108~129 (2006), Congressional Quarterly Press
- Ostrom, E., "Theories of the policy process", pp.21~64 (2007), Westview
- Ostrom, E., "Background on the institutional analysis and development framework", Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), pp.7~27 (2011)
- Pallagst, K., "Growth management in the US: Between theory and practice" (2007), Ashgate
- Porter, D. R., "Reinventing growth management for the 21st century", William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 23(3), pp.705~738 (1999)
- Protash, W., "Growth policies and community satisfaction : A test and modification of logan’s theory", Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, pp.397~412 (1983)
- Ramirez, E. E., "Local political institutions and smart growth : An empirical study of the politics of compact development", Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), pp.218~246 (2009)
- Remler, D. K., "Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation" (2014), Sage Publications, Inc
- Sabatier, P., "Theories of the policy process" (2007), Westview
- Steel, B., "Growth management policy and county government : Correlates of policy adoption across the United States", State and Local Government Review, 32(1), pp.7~19 (2000)
- Teske, P., "Interests and institutions on state regulation", American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), pp.139~154 (1991)
- Wagner, W. E., "Using IBM SPSS statistics for research methods and social science statistics" (2013), Sage Publications, Inc
- Wallis, A., "Pathways to managing regional growth: Lessons from Portland, Oregon, and Denver, Colorado", Borderlands: The Journal of Spatial Planning in Ireland, 2, pp.9~20 (2012)
- Zahariadis, N., "Local government and the implementation of Alabama’s economic development policy", Public Administration Quarterly, 29(1), pp.7~32 (2005)