Residential Development and Hierarchical Governance: Multifamily Housing and Multilevel Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates factors that influence multifamily housing zoning from a hierarchical governance perspective. Local zoning is a product of interactive processes among various stakeholders and of local politics. Since local zoning represents community interests in land development and has an exclusionary characteristic, multifamily housing zoning is controversial in some localities. We hypothesize that a hierarchical governance structure influences the supply of local multifamily housing zoning. The result of a hierarchical generalized linear model shows evidence that state smart growth reform and state intervention in local land use are positively associated with the establishment of local multifamily housing zoning. The decisions are also affected by local factors such as the supply of land, density restrictions, cost of new infrastructure, and city budget constraints. This study concludes that state authority and smart growth reform make it possible for local governments to commit to multifamily housing zoning to achieve housing affordability and high density development.
Abstract
This study investigates factors that influence multifamily housing zoning from a hierarchical governance perspective. Local zoning is a product of interactive processes among various stakeholders and of local politics. Since local zoning represents community interests in land development and has an exclusionary characteristic, multifamily housing zoning is controversial in some localities. We hypothesize that a hierarchical governance structure influences the supply of local multifamily housing zoning. The result of a hierarchical generalized linear model shows evidence that state smart growth reform and state intervention in local land use are positively associated with the establishment of local multifamily housing zoning. The decisions are also affected by local factors such as the supply of land, density restrictions, cost of new infrastructure, and city budget constraints. This study concludes that state authority and smart growth reform make it possible for local governments to commit to multifamily housing zoning to achieve housing affordability and high density development.
참고문헌 (41)
- "Planning for smart growth: 2002 state of the states" (2002)[URL]
- Anthony, J., "Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl?", Urban Affairs Review, 39(3), pp.376~397 (2004)
- Bollens, S. A., "State growth management: Intergovernmental frameworks and policy objectives", Journal of American Planning Association, 58(4), pp.454~466 (1992)
- Bryson, J. M., "The design and implementation of cross-sector collaboration: Propositions from the literature", Public Administration Review, 66, pp.44~55 (2006)
- Burge, G., "The effects of impact fees on multifamily housing construction", Journal of Regional Science, 46(1), pp.5~23 (2006)
- Carruthers, J. I., "The impacts of state growth management programmes?: A comparative analysis", Urban Studies, 39(11), pp.1959~1982 (2002)
- Chapman, J. I., "Land use planning and the local budget", Public Administration Review, 48(4), pp.800~806 (1988)
- Coase, R. H., "The nature of the firm", Economica, 4, pp.386~405 (1937)
- "Myths and facts about affordable and high density housing" (2002)[URL]
- Emerson, K., "An integrative framework for collaborative governance", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), pp.1~29 (2011)[DOI]
- Evans-Cowley, J. S., "The effect of development impact fees on land values", Growth and Change, 36(1), pp.100~112 (2005)
- Feiock, R. C., "The political economy of growth management", American Politics Quarterly, 22(2), pp.208~220 (1994)
- "Zoning and land use regulation" (1999)[URL]
- "An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects" (2001)[URL]
- Geyskens, I., "Make, buy or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis", Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), pp.519~543 (2006)
- Gyourko, J., "A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton residential land use regulatory index", Urban Studies, 45(3), pp.693~729 (2007)
- Haughey, R. W., "The case for multifamily housing" (2003), Urban Land Institute
- Howell-Moroney, M., "A mixed method look at state growth management policy", The American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), pp.339~361 (2007)
- In-Sung Kang, "Implementation of Growth Management Policy in Florida Cities: Zoning Approval and Regulatory Policy Enforcement", International Review of Public Administration, 11(1), pp.85~98 (2006), 한국행정학회
- Knapp, G., "De we know regulatory barriers when we see them? An exploration using zoning and development indicators", Housing Policy Debate, 18(4), pp.711~749 (2007)
- Lawhon, L. L., "Local government use of development impact fees, In Municipal year book", pp.2007, International City
- Lubell, M., "Political institutions and conversation by local government", Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), pp.706~729 (2005)
- Mathur, S., "The effect of impact fees on the price of new single-family housing", Urban Studies, 41(7), pp.1303~1312 (2004)
- State rules and city money, "McCabe, B. C.", Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, ~ (2001)
- McClure, K., "Deconcentrating poverty with housing programs", Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(1), pp.90~99 (2008)
- Miller, T. I., "Must growth restrictions eliminate moderate-priced housing?", Journal of American Planning Association, 52(3), pp.319~325 (1986)
- Nelson, A. C., "The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence" (2002), Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy
- Obrinsky, M., "Overcoming opposition to multifamily rental housing" (2007), National Multi Housing Council
- Ostrom, E., "Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Ostrom, E., "Understanding institutional diversity" (2005), Princeton University Press
- Park, S., "Participants in local zoning decision and multifamily housing: Transaction costs and hierarchical governance", Presented at the annual meeting of 2011 Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, Louisiana (2012)
- 박정원, "THE ADOPTION OF STATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT REGULATION (SGMR): REGARDING INSTITUTIONALANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT (IAD) FRAMEWORK AND EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS", International Review of Public Administration, 15(2), pp.43~58 (2010), 한국행정학회
- Pendall, R., "Do land-use controls cause sprawl?", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(4), pp.555~571 (1999)
- Persson, T., "Political economics" (2000), MIT Press
- Peterson, P. E., "City limits" (1981), University of Chicago Press
- Tavares, A. F., "Political institutions and land use decisions: A multi-level analysis of city and county choices", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA 2008 Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts (2008)
- Turner, B. S., "Intergovernmental growth management: A partnership framework for state-local relations", Publius, 20(3), pp.79~95 (1990)
- "The role of affordable housing in creating jobs and stimulating local economic development: A review of the literature" (2011)[URL]
- Weitz, J., "From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960-1999", Journal of Planning Literature, 14(2), pp.266~337 (1999)
- Williamson, O. E., "Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications" (1975), Free Press
- 유동상, "Understanding Local Politics and Affordable Housing : In terms of Political Market Theory", 지방행정연구, 24(4), pp.423~448 (2010), 한국지방행정연구원