본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

층소된 사회정체성 구조에서 정체성 불확실성과 내집단 동일시, 남북한 화해 태도 및 행동의도 간 관계

Relationship between Nested Social Identity Uncertainty, Group Identification, Reconciliatory Attitudes and Intentions in Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류심리과학

초록

본 연구는 민족정체성과 국가정체성으로 구분되는 한국인의 다층 사회정체성 불확실성 및 동일시와 남북한 화해에 대한 태도 및 행동의도 간 관계를 분석하였다. 대한민국 거주 일반인 1,000명을 대상으로 조사 연구를 실시한 결과, 한민족정체성과 남한정체성의 불확실성과 동일시, 그리고 남북한 화해에 대한 태도 및 행동의도에서 성별, 연령대, 학력, 거주지역, 소득수준에 따른 차이가 나타났다. 본 연구에서 가설화한 경로모형 검증 결과, 한민족정체성 불확실성은 남한에 대한 동일시와 상관이 없었지만, 남한정체성 불확실성은 한민족에 대한 동일시를 정적으로 예측하고 한민족 동일시가 남북한 화해 태도를 매개로 화해 행동의도를 정적으로 예측하였다. 이는 상위범주와 하위범주 정체성 불확실성과 동일시 간 비대칭적 상보성 가정(Jung, Hogg, & Choi, 2016)을 지지하는 결과이다. 끝으로 본 연구 결과가 남북한 갈등 해소 및 사회통합에서 지니는 함의를 논하였다.

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between social identity uncertainty and levels of social identification among Koreans whose social identities are nested in a hierarchical structure involving ethnic identity (i.e., Han-ethnicity) and national identity (i.e., South Korean). The presumed link between social identity uncertainty and social identification was tested in a path model that stipulates a positive relationship between ethnic identification (but not national identification) and individuals’ attitudes and action intention toward intergroup reconciliation. Data were obtained from 1,000 adult Koreans residing in Korea using a stratified sampling method. A path analysis revealed that, as expected, subgroup (South Korea) identity uncertainty strengthened identification with the superordinate category (Han-ethnicity), which predicted positively attitudes towards intergroup reconciliation. Attitudes toward intergroup reconciliation, in turn, predicted positively individuals’ intention to engage in reconciliatory behavior. By contrast, superordinate identity (Han-ethnicity) uncertainty did not predict subgroup (South Korea) identification. We also found differences in the attitudes and action intention across several demographic variables. We discuss implications of the findings from the perspective of an asymmetric compensation between superordinate identity uncertainty and subgroup identification in Korea. We also discuss practical implications and future directions.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 김혜숙, "다문화시대 한국인의 심리적 적응: 집단정체성, 문화적응 이데올로기와 접촉이 이주민에 대한 편견에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 25(2), pp.51~89 (2011), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  2. 유연재, "‘한집단’범주의 점화가 북한사람에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지 : 사회 및 성격, 14(1), pp.91~112 (2000)
  3. Abrams, D., "APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 2: Group Processes", pp.203~228 (2015), American Psychological Association
  4. Dominic Abrams, "Twenty years of group processes and intergroup relations research: A review of past progress and future prospects", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), pp.561~569 (2017), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  5. Daniel Bar‐Tal, "From Intractable Conflict Through Conflict Resolution To Reconciliation: Psychological Analysis", Political Psychology, 21(2), pp.351~365 (2002), Wiley[DOI]
  6. Daniel Bar-Tal, "Sociopsychological Foundations of Intractable Conflicts", American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), pp.1430~1453 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  7. Bar-Tal, D., "The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology", pp.923~956 (2013), Oxford University Press
  8. Bentler, P. M., "Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures", Psychological Bulletin, 88, pp.588~606 (1980)[DOI]
  9. Stephen R Briggs, "The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales", Journal of Personality, 54(1), pp.106~148 (1986), Wiley[DOI]
  10. James E Cameron, "A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity", Self and Identity, 3(3), pp.239~262 (2004), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  11. Campbell, D. T., "Nebraska Symposium on Motivation", pp.283~311 (1965), University of Nebraska Press
  12. Lee Anna Clark, "Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.", Psychological Assessment, 7(3), pp.309~319 (1995), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  13. Crisp, R. J., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 39", pp.163~254 (2007), Academic Press
  14. John F. Dovidio, "Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity", European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), pp.296~330 (2010), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  15. John F. Dovidio, "Commonality and the Complexity of “We”: Social Attitudes and Social Change", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), pp.3~20 (2009), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  16. Dovidio, J. F., "Psychology of Prosocial Behavior:Group Processes, Intergroup Relations, and Helping", pp.191~207 (2010), Wiley-Blackwell
  17. Ellemers, N., "Handbook of theories of social psychology Vol. 2", pp.379~398 (2012), SAGE Publications Ltd
  18. Gaertner, S. L., "Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model" (2000), The Psychology Press
  19. Michael A. Hogg, "Subjective Uncertainty Reduction through Self-categorization: A Motivational Theory of Social Identity Processes", European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), pp.223~255 (2011), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  20. Hogg, M. A., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 39", pp.69~126 (2007), Academic Press
  21. Hogg, M. A., "Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory", pp.3~17 (2016), Springer International
  22. Hogg, M. A., "Intergroup relations and group solidarity : Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, pp.295~309 (1996)[DOI]
  23. Michael A. Hogg, "The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), pp.1061~1066 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  24. Hu, L. T., "Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification", Psychological Methods, 3, pp.424~453 (1998)[DOI]
  25. Jiin Jung, "Reaching Across the DMZ: Identity Uncertainty and Reunification on the Korean Peninsula", Political Psychology, 37(3), pp.341~350 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
  26. Jiin Jung, "Recategorization and ingroup projection: Two processes of identity uncertainty reduction", Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(2), pp.97~114 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
  27. Jiin Jung, "Identity uncertainty and UK–Scottish relations: Different dynamics depending on relative identity centrality", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), pp.861~873 (2017), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  28. Jiin Jung, "From uncertain boundaries to uncertain identity: Effects of entitativity threat on identity–uncertainty and emigration", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(10), pp.623~633 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
  29. "Measuring model fit" (2014)[URL]
  30. Kelman, H. C., "The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation", pp.15~32 (2008), Oxford University Press
  31. Barbara-Ann Mullin, "Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination", British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), pp.345~365 (1998), Wiley[DOI]
  32. Nadler, A., "The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict", pp.291~308 (2012), Oxford University Press
  33. Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric theory" (1978), McGraw-Hill
  34. Sonia Roccas, "The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), pp.698~711 (2006), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  35. David K. Sherman, "Perceived Polarization: Reconciling Ingroup and Intergroup Perceptions Under Uncertainty", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), pp.95~109 (2009), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  36. Nurit Shnabel, "Promoting Reconciliation Through the Satisfaction of the Emotional Needs of Victimized and Perpetrating Group Members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), pp.1021~1030 (2009), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  37. Nurit Shnabel, "Warm or competent? Improving intergroup relations by addressing threatened identities of advantaged and disadvantaged groups", European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, pp.482~492 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
  38. H. Tajfel, "Social identity and intergroup behaviour", Social Science Information, 13(2), pp.65~93 (1974), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  39. Tajfel, H., "Psychology of Intergroup Relations", pp.276~293 (1986), NelsonHall
  40. Tropp, L. R., "The Oxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict" (2012), Oxford University Press
  41. Turner, J. C., "Handbook of theories of social psychology Vol. 2", pp.399~417 (2012), SAGE Publications Ltd
  42. Sven Waldzus, "When “different” means “worse”: In-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(1), pp.76~83 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  43. Michael Wenzel, "The Ingroup as Pars Pro Toto: Projection From the Ingroup Onto the Inclusive Category as a Precursor to Social Discrimination", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), pp.461~473 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

한국인의 이중 사회정체성과 내집단 투사, 남북한 통일태도 간 관계권영미, 박주화, 서정길, 이하연, 최훈석한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2022 · 제36권 제4호남북한 관계에서 한민족 범주복잡성과 한민족동일시가 외집단 관용 및 집단 간 통합지향 행동의도에 미치는 효과노중현, 도은별, 이하연, 최훈석, 한지민한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2023 · 제37권 제2호남북통합 행동의도에서 한민족 정체성과 국가 정체성의 상호작용: 집합적 죄책감을 매개로 하는 조절된 매개모형 검증박찬, 최훈석한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2023 · 제37권 제1호남북한 관계에서 외집단 공감에 대한 공동내집단정체성과 조망수용 초점의 상호작용효과이하연, 최훈석한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2025 · 제39권 제1호사회정체성 불확실성과 자기-해석이 내집단 동일시 및 집단 이탈의도에 미치는 영향: 조절된 매개모형 검증정옥아, 최훈석한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2024 · 제38권 제2호사회적 신념 및 남북 통일에 대한 태도, 통일정책 지지 간의 관계: 조절 및 매개모형 검증권영미, 박주화, 이하연, 최훈석한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2021 · 제35권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)