본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

한국형 다차원 성격검사 단축형(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory-Short Form: BDPI-SF) 개발

Development of short form of multi-dimensional personality inventory (Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: BDPI)

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류심리과학

초록

본 연구에서는 한국형 다차원 성격검사의 단축형을 개발하고 타당화하였다. 단축형 검사 개발을 위해 원 검사에서 문항을 선별하고, 단축형 검사의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 단축형 검사 개발을 위해 임상심리전문가와 심리측정전문가가 문항의 변별도와 심각도, 문항 내용을 고려하여 원 검사에서 33문항을 선별하였다. 선별된 문항으로 구성된 단축형 검사는 원 검사에 비해 개별 5요인을 구성하는 문항 수가 적어 내적 일관성 지수와 신뢰도가 전반적으로 다소 낮아졌지만, 요인구조 타당도는 원 검사의 모형 적합도보다 향상되었고, 원 검사와 동일한 요인구조가 확인되었다. 단축형 검사의 수렴타당도도 원 검사의 타당도와 유사하였으며, 두 검사 점수의 프로파일도 동일한 형태를 나타내었다. 한국형 다차원 성격검사 단축형은 원 검사와 비교했을 때 문항이 80% 이상 줄었지만, 5요인을 측정함에 있어 정보의 큰 손실 없이 원 검사가 측정하는 성격특성을 정확하게 측정하는 것으로 보인다. 5요인 각각에 속한 하위 요인을 평가하기 위해서는 원 검사를 활용해야 하겠지만, 5요인을 주요 변인으로 하는 연구나 신속한 성격 측정을 위한 임상 장면 등에서는 한국형 다차원 성격검사 단축형의 활용도가 높을 것으로 생각된다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a short form of a multi-dimensional personality inventory(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: BDPI). Items were selected from the original form in order to develop the BDPI short form, and the reliability and validity of the short form were examined. A clinical psychologist and psychometrician selected 33 of the 165 original items in light of the item content and parameters(severity and discrimination). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were generally low. The reason for the low reliability was an insufficient number of items for each factor. The model fit of the short form was better than that of the original form and the short form showed the same factor structure as the original form. The convergent validity of the short form was similar to that of the original form and the profiles of the short form and original form were similar to each other. As a result, although the short form was reduced by 80% from the original form, it was confirmed that the short form generated precise measurement of the same personality traits as the original form does. In order to evaluate the sub-factors belonging to each of the five factors, the original form should be used, but it is thought that the short form will be widely utilized in studies using the five factors as the main variable or in clinical settings for rapid measurements of personality. Finally, in the discussion section, limitations are addressed and suggestions are presented for further research.

참고문헌 (75)

  1. 김명기, "한국형 다차원 성격검사(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: BDPI)의 개발과 타당화: 일반 성격과 부적응 성격의 통합", 한국심리학회지:일반, 39(3), pp.359~383 (2020), 한국심리학회[DOI]
  2. 김지현, "간편형 한국어 BFI(Big Five Inventory) 타당화 연구", 인간이해, 32(1), pp.47~65 (2011), 학생생활상담연구소
  3. 김홍석, "단축형 사회적 문제해결 검사의 타당화", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32(3), pp.611~625 (2013), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  4. 김혜온, "자기보고식 성격측정도구의 재검사 신뢰도에서의 문화적 차이: 한국과 독일의 비교", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 29(3), pp.67~83 (2015), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  5. 민병모, "NEO PI-R로 본 한국인 5요인 성격구조", 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 2000(1), pp.118~119 (2000)
  6. 박두진, "한국형 다차원 성격검사(Big10 Inventory)의 사용자 교본(User’s Manual)" (2019), Psychology BasedConsulting Group
  7. 박 정, "검사의 길이, 반응 범주의 개수, 피험자의 수 및 피험자 능력분포에 따른 다분문항반응이론 모형의 문항모수 추정치의정확도", 교육평가연구, 12(1), pp.17~42 (1999)
  8. 서동기, "단축형 심리검사 개발의 측정학적 방법과 타당화: 한국형 역기능우울척도를 중심으로", 한국심리학회지:일반, 38(1), pp.75~102 (2019), 한국심리학회[DOI]
  9. 성태제, "타당도와 신뢰도" (2002), 학지사
  10. 성태제, "문항반응이론의 이해와 적용" (2016), 교육과학사
  11. 신소영, "한국판 DSM-5 성격검사(PID-5)의 신뢰도와 타당도", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 30(3), pp.1~24 (2016), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  12. 이상준, "다차원 성격검사 도구의 개발과 타당화 예비연구: 일반 성격과 부적응 성격의 통합적 평가", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), pp.318~334 (2019), 한국임상심리학회
  13. 홍태화, "한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 단축형(Korean version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form, K-PID-5-SF)의 구성과 타당화", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(3), pp.396~410 (2018), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  14. Nadia Al-Dajani, "A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current Status and Future Directions", Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), pp.62~81 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  15. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" (2013), American Psychiatric Publishing
  16. Jaime L. Anderson, "Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology", Assessment, 25(5), pp.596~607 (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  17. Tihomir Asparouhov, "Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), pp.397~438 (2009), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  18. Beck, A. T., "The personality belief questionnaire. Unpublished assessment instrument" (1991), The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research
  19. Benet-Martínez, V., "Handbook of personality: Theory and research", pp.542~567 (2008), Guilford Press
  20. Cai, L., (2017), Scientific Software International, Inc
  21. Chakravarty, E. F., "Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing", The Journal of Rheumatology, 34(6), pp.1426~1431 (2007)
  22. Clark, L. A., "Personality disorder diagnosis: Limitations of the five-factor model", Psychological Inquiry, 4, pp.100~104 (1993)
  23. Daiana Colledani, "Using Item Response Theory for the Development of a New Short Form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised", Frontiers in Psychology, 9, pp.1834~ (2018), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  24. Cortina, J. M., "What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, pp.98~104 (1993)
  25. Costa Jr., P. T., "Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality", Journal of Personality Disorders, 4(4), pp.362~371 (1990)
  26. Costa Jr., P. T., "Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual" (1992), Psychological Assessment Resources
  27. Costa Jr., P. T., "The oxford handbook of five factor model", pp.11~37 (2017), Guilford Press
  28. Reinout E. De Vries, "Using Personality Item Characteristics to Predict Single–Item Internal Reliability, Retest Reliability, and Self–Other Agreement", European Journal of Personality, 30(6), pp.618~636 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  29. Colin G. DeYoung, "Ten aspects of the Big Five in the Personality Inventory for DSM–5", Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), pp.113~123 (2016), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  30. Embretson, S. E., "Item response theory for psychologists" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  31. Tammy English, "Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), pp.478~490 (2007), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  32. Lauren R. Few, "Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(4), pp.1057~1069 (2013), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  33. Johnathan D. Forbey, "Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 computerized adaptive version", Psychological Assessment, 19(1), pp.14~24 (2007), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  34. Goldberg, L. R., "Language and individual differences: The research for universals in personality lexicons", Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), pp.141~165 (1981)
  35. Gore, W. L., "The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and the five factor model", doctor, pp.2013
  36. Whitney L. Gore, "The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), pp.816~821 (2013), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  37. Samuel D Gosling, "A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains", Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), pp.504~528 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  38. Hambleton, R. K., "Fundamentals of item response theory" (1991), Sage
  39. Kyung (Chris) Tyek Han, "Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 15, pp.7~ (2018), Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute[DOI]
  40. Christopher J. Hopwood, "How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories Be Evaluated?", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), pp.332~346 (2010), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  41. Li‐tze Hu, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  42. IBM Corp, (2017), IBM Corp
  43. John, O. P., "Handbook of personality: Theory and research", pp.103~138 (1999), Guilford Press
  44. Judge, T. A., "Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms", pp.332~355 (2007), Edward Elgar Publishing
  45. Chie Kanagawa, "“Who Am I?” The Cultural Psychology of the Conceptual Self", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), pp.90~103 (2001), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  46. Kline, R. B., "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" (2016), Guilford
  47. R. F. Krueger, "Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5", Psychological Medicine, 42(9), pp.1879~1890 (2012), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  48. Todd D. Little, "Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one", Psychological Methods, 18(3), pp.285~300 (2013), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  49. Jessica L. Maples, "Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5", Psychological Assessment, 27(4), pp.1195~1210 (2015), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  50. Masaki Matsunaga, "Item Parceling in Structural Equation Modeling: A Primer", Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4), pp.260~293 (2008), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  51. Robert C. MacCallum, "Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling", Psychological Methods, 1(2), pp.130~149 (1996), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  52. Robert R. McCrae, "Trait Psychology and Culture: Exploring Intercultural Comparisons", Journal of Personality, 69(6), pp.819~846 (2002), Wiley[DOI]
  53. McCrae, R. R., "The five-factor model of personality across cultures", pp.2002, Kluwer Academic
  54. McCrae, R. R., "The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives", pp.51~87 (1992), Guilford Press
  55. Eiji Muraki, "A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an EM Algorithm", Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), pp.159~176 (1992), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  56. Muthén, L. K., "Mplus user's guide" (1998), Muthén & Muthén
  57. Andreia Nunes, "Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)", Frontiers in Psychology, 9, pp.461~ (2018), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  58. Maria Orlando, "Likelihood-Based Item-Fit Indices for Dichotomous Item Response Theory Models", Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(1), pp.50~64 (2000), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  59. Ostini, R., "Handbook of polytomous item response theory models", pp.3~20 (2010), Routledge
  60. Lena C. Quilty, "The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample", Assessment, 20(3), pp.362~369 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  61. Steven P. Reise, "Computerization and Adaptive Administration of the NEO PI-R", Assessment, 7(4), pp.347~364 (2000), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  62. Samejima, F., "Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores", Psychometrika Monograph, 34(Suppl), pp.100~114 (1969)
  63. Dong Gi Seo, "Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing", certification examinations, 2017, pp.14, 17~[DOI]
  64. Leonard J. Simms, "Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Personality Disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD Project", Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), pp.380~389 (2011), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  65. Mickey B. Smith, "Upsides to Dark and Downsides to Bright Personality: A Multidomain Review and Future Research Agenda", Journal of Management, 44(1), pp.191~217 (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  66. Niels Smits, "Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study", Psychiatry Research, 188(1), pp.147~155 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  67. Jennifer L. Tackett, "A dimensional model of personality disorder: Incorporating DSM Cluster A characteristics", Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, S(1), pp.27~34 (2009), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  68. Katherine M. Thomas, "The Convergent Structure of DSM-5 Personality Trait Facets and Five-Factor Model Trait Domains", Assessment, 20(3), pp.308~311 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  69. Triandis, H. C., "Individualism and collectivism" (1995), Westview Press
  70. Otto B. Walter, "Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for ‘Anxiety’ (Anxiety-CAT)", Quality of Life Research, 16(S1), pp.143~155 (2007), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  71. David Watson, "Structures of Personality and Their Relevance to Psychopathology: II. Further Articulation of a Comprehensive Unified Trait Structure", Journal of Personality, 76(6), pp.1545~1586 (2008), Wiley[DOI]
  72. David Watson, "Integrating Normal and Pathological Personality", Assessment, 20(3), pp.312~326 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  73. David J. Weiss, "Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing", Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), pp.473~492 (1982), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  74. Young, J. E., "An integrative schema-focused model for personality disorders", Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 6(1), pp.11~23 (1992)
  75. Ziegler, M., "Short scales–Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them", Journal of Individual Differences, 35, pp.185~189 (2014)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

한국형 다차원 성격검사(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: BDPI)의 개발과 타당화: 일반 성격과 부적응 성격의 통합김명기, 박두진, 서동기, 이상준, 최기홍, 한여울한국심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:일반2020 · 제39권 제3호한국형 다차원 성격검사의 잠재프로파일 분석: 원 검사와 단축형 검사의 비교를 중심으로박용천, 서동기, 조은실, 최기홍, 최상민한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2022 · 제36권 제4호다차원 성격검사 도구의 개발과 타당화 예비연구: 일반 성격과 부적응 성격의 통합적 평가김명기, 김효원, 박두진, 박재영, 서동기, 이상준, 이희재, 최기홍, 최정욱, 한여울한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2019 · 제38권 제3호성격 5요인검사 단축형(BFI-SF) 타당화 연구심예은, 정승철, 최은실인지발달중재학회 · 인지발달중재학회지2021 · 제12권 제3호한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 단축형(Korean version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form, K-PID-5-SF)의 구성과 타당화김율리, 홍태화, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제3호한국판 어두운 성격 3요소 단축형의 요인구조와 타당화 지표박종철, 배병훈, 손하림, 오현주, 이나희, 이동귀한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2021 · 제34권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)