한국형 다차원 성격검사의 잠재프로파일 분석: 원 검사와 단축형 검사의 비교를 중심으로
Latent Profile Analysis of Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: Focused on comparison of origin form and short form
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 한국형 다차원 성격검사(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory, BDPI)의 단축형 검사의 잠재프로파일을 분석하고 원 검사의 잠재프로파일 분석 결과와 동등한지를 검증하였다. 잠재프로파일 분석에는 총 1,059명의 데이터를 사용하여 한국형 다차원 성격검사의 5개의 일반 요인과 5개의 부적응 요인 상위 10요인 점수가 분석에 포함되었다. BDPI 원 검사의 잠재 집단은 세 집단으로 나타났고, 단축형 검사도 원 검사와 동일하게 3집단으로 분류되었다. 연구진은 세 집단을 적응형 성격 집단, 보통 성격 집단, 부적응형 성격 집단으로 명명하였다. 두 검사의 각 집단 별 점수 분포를 확인해본 결과 유사한 점수 분포가 나타났으며, 원 검사와 단축형 검사의 퍼센트 일치도는 86.89%로 높은 수준의 일치도를 보였고, Cohen’s kappa 계수는 .78로 상당한 수준의 일치도를 보였다. 단축형 검사의 잠재 집단에 따른 성격 요인 점수 차이를 확인한 결과 일반 성격 5요인과 부적응 성격 5요인 모두 집단에 따른 점수의 차이가 통계적으로 유의했으며, 잠재 집단에 따른 상위 요인 10개의 성격 요인 점수의 차이를 확인했을 때 일반적 성격 특성에서 점수 차이가 없던 두 집단이 부적응적 성격 특성에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 잠재프로파일 분석으로 도출된 세 집단이 실제 부적응 성격인 성격장애 점수를 예측하는지 검증하기 위해, 한국판 축약표준성격평가-자기보고형(SAPAS-SR) 점수를 종속변수로 예측 타당도를 검증하였다. 그 결과 각 집단에 따른 점수 차이가 통계적으로 유의하게 나타났으며, 부적응형 성격 집단이 SAPAS-SR에서 가장 높은 평균 점수를 보였다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 제한점과 시사점을 논의하였다.
Abstract
In this study, latent profile analysis of Bright and Dark Personality Inventory-Short Form was conducted and verified whether it was equivalent to the latent profile analysis result of the original form. Collected 1,059 people data for BDPI validation study was used, and latent profile analysis was conducted on the 10 high-order factor score of General personality 5 and Maladaptive personality 5 factor. In BDPI original form, latent group was determined as three groups. and BDPI short form’s latent group was determined as three groups like the orignal form. These three groups were named as “well-adjusted personality group”, “ordinary personality group”, “maladaptive personality group”. As a result, the score distribution of each group of the two forms were similar each other like that score distribution was found before, the percentage agreement between the original form and the short form was 86.89%, and the Cohen’s kappa coefficient between the original form and the short form was .778, showing a significant level of agreement. The difference in personality scores according to three latent groups of the short form was statistically significant. When the difference in personality scores of the high-order 10 factors according to the latent group was confirmed, the two groups with no score difference in general personality trait showed a significant difference in maladaptive personality trait. The latent groups predict differently Self-Report Standardized Assessment of Personality- Abbreviated Scale(SAPAS-SR) score, which proved prediction validity of BDPI-SF. The score differences according to each group were statistically significant, and the maladaptive personality group predicted the high SAPAS-SR average score. Finally, contributions and limitations of this study were presented in the discussion section.
참고문헌 (80)
- 김명기, "한국형 다차원 성격검사(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: BDPI)의 개발과 타당화: 일반 성격과 부적응 성격의 통합", 한국심리학회지:일반, 39(3), pp.359~383 (2020), 한국심리학회[DOI]
- 김범구, "잠재계층분석(LCA)을 이용한 학업중단 청소년의 유형과 특성", 한국청소년연구, 24(3), pp.5~31 (2013), 한국청소년정책연구원
- 김홍석, "단축형 사회적 문제해결 검사의 타당화", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32(3), pp.611~625 (2013), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
- 구소희, "3단계 접근법을 활용한 잠재계층모형의 추정", 인문사회 21, 11(2), pp.29~44 (2020), 인문사회 21
- 민병모, "NEO PI-R로 본 한국인 5요인 성격구조", 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 2000(1), pp.118~119 (2000)
- 박두진, "한국형 다차원 성격검사(Big10 Inventory)의 사용자 교본(User's Manual)" (2019), Psychology Based Consulting Grup
- 서동기, "단축형 심리검사 개발의 측정학적 방법과 타당화: 한국형 역기능우울척도를 중심으로", 한국심리학회지:일반, 38(1), pp.75~102 (2019), 한국심리학회[DOI]
- 김지원, "성장혼합모형(Growth Mixture Model)을 적용한 은퇴자 우울의 잠재계층 분류 및 영향요인 검증", 조사연구, 20(1), pp.45~72 (2019), 한국조사연구학회[DOI]
- 오영교, "대학생의 진로도구준비 유형 분석: 잠재계층분석방법(Latent Class Analysis)을 활용하여", 통계연구, 23(3), pp.39~64 (2018), 통계청[DOI]
- 오현성, "대학생의 성격 5요인이 전공만족과 편입의도에 미치는 영향: 잠재프로파일분석(LPA)을 중심으로", 청소년학연구, 27(12), pp.307~341 (2020), 한국청소년학회[DOI]
- 이상준, "다차원 성격검사 도구의 개발과 타당화 예비연구: 일반 성격과 부적응 성격의 통합적 평가", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), pp.318~334 (2019), 한국임상심리학회
- 이정민, "잠재프로파일 분석을 통한 청소년의 휴대전화 사용과 의존도 유형 분류 및 관련 변인들의 영향력 검증", 한국청소년연구, 27(2), pp.121~157 (2016), 한국청소년정책연구원[DOI]
- 이해인, "한국 청소년의 음주행동 잠재계층 유형 및 예측요인: 잠재계층분석 방법의 적용", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 49(6), pp.701~712 (2019), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
- 임정아, "잠재프로파일 분석(LPA)을 이용한 부모양육방식 유형과 삶의 목표와의 관계", 한국청소년연구, 29(1), pp.323~346 (2018), 한국청소년정책연구원[DOI]
- 전경희, "수학과 정의적 성취 특성의 잠재프로파일 분석", 교육과정평가연구, 22(2), pp.319~339 (2019), 한국교육과정평가원[DOI]
- 최유경, "임상군의 MMPI-2, DAS 반응에 대한 잠재프로파일 분석과 판별 연구", 예술심리치료연구, 18(1), pp.271~289 (2022), 한국예술심리치료학회[DOI]
- 최정욱, "한국형 다차원 성격검사 단축형(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory-Short Form: BDPI-SF) 개발", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 35(1), pp.43~67 (2021), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
- 최지수, "한국판 축약표준성격평가-자기보고형(Self-Report Standardized Assessment of Personality- Abbreviated Scale)의 성격장애 선별 진단의 유용성 : 예비타당도 연구", 신경정신의학, 54(4), pp.534~541 (2015), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- 홍태화, "한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 단축형(Korean version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form, K-PID-5-SF)의 구성과 타당화", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(3), pp.396~410 (2018), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
- Al-Dajani, N., "A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5) : Current status and future directions", Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), pp.62~81 (2016)
- Aldenderfer, M., "Cluster analysis" (1984), Sage publications
- Allport, G. W., "Traitnames: A psycho-lexical study", Psychological Monographs, 47, pp.i~171 (1936)
- Cattell, R. B., "The description of personality : Basic traits resolved into clusters", The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, pp.476~506 (1943)
- American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.)", American Psychiatric Publishing, ~ (2013)
- Anderson, J. L., "Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form(PID-5-BF)in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology", Assessment, 25(5), pp.596~607 (2018)[DOI]
- Bach, B., "Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders : Six cases from practice", Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 21, pp.3~25 (2015)
- Bach, B., "Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits : Initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems", Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136(1), pp.108~117 (2017)
- Bassi, F., "Latent Class Analysis for Marketing Scale Development", International Journal of Market Research, 53(2), pp.209~230 (2011)[DOI]
- Cho, E, "The role of maladaptive aspects of five-factor personality traits and personality pathology index in the assessment of personality pathology", ~
- Christian Geiser, "Mplus를 이용한 데이터 분석" (2019), 학지사
- Clark, L. A., "Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder : Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization", Annual Review of Psychology, 58, pp.227~257 (2007)
- Cohen, J, "A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, pp.37~46 (1960)[DOI]
- Collins, L. M., "Latent class and latent transition analysis : With applications in the social" (2009), Wiley
- Cortina, J. M., "What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, pp.98~104 (1993)
- Costa Jr, P. T., "Four ways five factors are basic", Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), pp.653~665 (1992)
- Costa, P. T., Jr., "The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model", pp.11~37 (2017), Oxford University Press
- Digman, J. M., "Personality structure : Emergence of the five factor model", Annual Review of Psychology, 41, pp.417~440 (1990)
- Ferguson, Sarah, "Finding latent groups in observed data : A primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers", International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44, pp.458~468 (2019)[DOI]
- Few, L. R., "Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample", Journal of abnormal psychology, 122(4), pp.1057~ (2013)
- Goldberg, L. R., "An alternative description of personality : The big five factor structure", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), pp.26~42 (1990)
- Gross, J. J., "Emotion generation and emotion regulation : One or two depends on your point of view", Emotion Review, 3(1), pp.8~16 (2011)[DOI]
- Han, Y., "Investigating how individual differences influence responses to the COVID-19 crisis : The role of maladaptive and five-factor personality traits", Personality and Individual Differences, 176, pp.110786~ (2021)[DOI]
- Holloway, K., "A latent profile analysis of dispositional hope and defense styles", Personality and Individual Differences, 114, pp.151~154 (2017)
- Judge, T. A., "Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms", pp.332~355 (2007), Edward Elgar Publishing
- Gosling, S. D., "A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains", Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), pp.504~528 (2003)[DOI]
- Jung T., "An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modelling", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, pp.302~317 (2008)
- Kline, R. B., "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" (2016), Guilford Press
- Krueger, R. F., "Personality and psychopathology : Working toward the bigger picture", Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(2), pp.109~128 (2003)
- Landis, J. R., "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", biometrics, pp.159~174 (1977)
- Leahy, R. L., "A model of emotional schemas", Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9(3), pp.177~190 (2002)[DOI]
- Lo, Y., "Testing the number of components in a normal mixture", Biometrika, 88, pp.767~778 (2001)
- Lubke, G. H., "Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models", Psychological Methods, 10(1), pp.21~39 (2005)
- Maples, J. L., "Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items : An item response theory investigation of the personality inventory for DSM-5", Psychological Assessment, 27(4), pp.1195~1210 (2015)[DOI]
- Marsh, H. W., "In search of golden rules : Comment on hypothesistesting approaches to setting cutoffvalues for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's(1999)findings", Structural equation modeling, 11, pp.320~341 (2004)[DOI]
- Marsh, H. W., "Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions : Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept", Structural Equation Modeling, 16, pp.191~225 (2009)
- Masyn, K. E., "The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods", pp.551~611 (2013), Oxford University Press
- McCrae, R. R., "Trait psychology and culture : Exploring intercultural comparisons", Journal of Personality, 69(6), pp.819~846 (2001)[DOI]
- Merz, E. L., "A latent profile analysis of the five factor model of personality : Modeling trait interactions", Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), pp.915~919 (2011)
- Meyer D, "vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data. R package version 1.4-9", ~ (2021)
- Morey, L. C., "Clinician judgments of clinical utility : A comparison of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(2), pp.398~405 (2014)
- Morin, A. J., "Complementary variable-and per-son-centered approaches to the dimensionality of psychometric constructs : Application to psychological wellbeing at work", Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), pp.395~419 (2017)
- Muthén, B., "Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences", pp.345~368 (2004), Sage
- Muthén, L. K, "Mplus User's Guide. Eighth Edition", ~ (2017)
- Nestadt, G., "The relationship between the five-factor model and latent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, personality disorder dimensions", Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49(1), pp.98~105 (2008)
- Nunes, A., "Short scales for the assessment of personality traits : Development and validation of the portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory(TIPI)", Frontiers in Psychology, 9, pp.461~ (2018)[DOI]
- Ozer, D. J., "Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes", Annual Review of Psychology, 57, pp.401~421 (2006)[DOI]
- Pastor, D. A., "A latent profile analysis of college students' achievement goal orientation", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), pp.8~47 (2007)[DOI]
- Perera, H. N., "Beyond congruence measures for the evaluation of personality factor structure replicability : An exploratory structural equation modeling approach", Personality and Individual Differences, 84, pp.23~29 (2015)
- Team, R. C., "R: A language and environment for statistical computing", R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ~ (2021)
- Ramaswamy, V., "An Empirical Pooling Approach for Estimating Marketing Mix Elasticities with PIMS Data", Marketing Science, 12(1), pp.103~124 (1993)
- Randolph, K. L., "Interactive effects of proactive personality and display rules on emotional labor in organizations", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(12), pp.2350~2359 (2013)
- Smith, M. B., "Upsides to dark and downsides to bright personality : A multidomain review and future research agenda", Journal of Management, 44(1), pp.191~217 (2018)[DOI]
- Tein, J. Y., "Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis", Structural Equation Modeling, 20, pp.640~657 (2013)
- Trull, T. J., "Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder", Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, pp.355~380 (2005)
- Vincent, W. J., "Statistics in Kinesiology" (2012), Human Kinetics
- Wall, H. J., "Personality profiles and persuasion : An exploratory study investigating the role of the Big-5, Type D personality and the Dark Triad on susceptibility to persuasion", Personality and Individual Differences, 139, pp.69~76 (2019)
- Widiger, T. A., "Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder : Shifting to a dimensional model", American Psychologist, 62, pp.71~83 (2007)
- Young, J. E., "An integrative schema-focused model for personality disorders", Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 6(1), pp.11~23 (1992)
- Zachar, P., "Personality disorder in DSM-5 : An oral history", Psychological Medicine, 46, pp.1~10 (2016)
- Ziegler, M., "Short scales-Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them", Journal of Individual Differences, 35, pp.185~189 (2014)[DOI]
