들뢰즈의 시뮬라크르와 존재의 새로운 이해
Simulacre and a New Concept of Being in Deleuz
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
simulacre is one of important cultural factors that characterize post-modern society. Therefore it is this concept, which many philosophers should pay more attention to and have to discuss actively. Deleuz's Philosophy is located in the centre of these discussions. The meaning of the word simulacre is derived from the thoughts of Plato. According to Plato's theory of Idea, is a simulacre understood as a copy, that is inferior to the same and permanent form ontologically. By platonism is the law of identity and the logic of representation strengthened, under which the particularity and the difference of simulacre are neglected and reduced to the Being of identity. This philosophical tradition criticizes Deleuz and casts light on the difference and repetition of the Being, that is implicated in simulacre. Henceforth can simulacre be defined as a path to the Being, that has to be taken a view of in a dimension of difference and repetition. Therefore in the radical criticism of traditional understandings of the Being must a simulacre be not unworthy and nonsense, but worthy to be considered. Rather though a simulacre may be no more than phantasma, which appears und disappears in a moment like images and events, must it be the violence, that upsets Idea. From our standpoint will we explain Deleuz's new concept of simulacre and Being in details.
Abstract
simulacre is one of important cultural factors that characterize post-modern society. Therefore it is this concept, which many philosophers should pay more attention to and have to discuss actively. Deleuz's Philosophy is located in the centre of these discussions. The meaning of the word simulacre is derived from the thoughts of Plato. According to Plato's theory of Idea, is a simulacre understood as a copy, that is inferior to the same and permanent form ontologically. By platonism is the law of identity and the logic of representation strengthened, under which the particularity and the difference of simulacre are neglected and reduced to the Being of identity. This philosophical tradition criticizes Deleuz and casts light on the difference and repetition of the Being, that is implicated in simulacre. Henceforth can simulacre be defined as a path to the Being, that has to be taken a view of in a dimension of difference and repetition. Therefore in the radical criticism of traditional understandings of the Being must a simulacre be not unworthy and nonsense, but worthy to be considered. Rather though a simulacre may be no more than phantasma, which appears und disappears in a moment like images and events, must it be the violence, that upsets Idea. From our standpoint will we explain Deleuz's new concept of simulacre and Being in details.
참고문헌 (13)
- 들뢰즈, "의미의 논리" (2009), 한길사
- 들뢰즈, "차이와 반복" (2004), 민음사
- 들뢰즈, "앙띠-오이디푸스" (1994), 민음사
- 들뢰즈, "스피노자와 표현의 문제" (2003), 인간사랑
- 박치완, "들뢰즈의 플라톤 비판과 시뮬라크르의 반란 또는 복수-「플라톤과 시뮬라크르」를 중심으로-", 철학연구, (31), pp.223~256 (2006), 철학연구소
- 벵상 데꽁브, "동일자와 타자" (1966), 인간사랑
- 서동욱, "들뢰즈의 철학" (2002), 민음사
- 아리스토텔레스, "형이상학, X" (2005), 문예출판사
- 안재오, "가상(假想) 개념 - 헤겔과 들뢰즈의 경우 -", 헤겔연구, (16), pp.81~112 (2004), 한국헤겔학회
- 이정우, "시뮬라크르의 시대" (2000), 거름
- 푸코, "말과 사물" (1996), 민음사
- 플라톤, "국가" (2005), 서광사
- G. Deleuze, "Nietzsche et la Philosophie" (1962), PUF
