철학적 글쓰기의 지도 원칙에 대한 고찰
An Essay on the Didactical Guideline for ‘Philosophical Writing’
3
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In recent years, ‘Philosophical Writing’ as a liberal arts course is being actively established in more and more universities in Korea. The aim of this paper is to propose a fundamental viewpoint of it on the basis of the classical conception of philosophy as ‘criticism of dailiness’. We can and must make good use of this ‘Philosophical Writing’course as a golden opportunity to return the ‘dialogue’ as the essential method of philosophizing to philosophy. And through the training of ‘Philosophical Writing’, we must continuously call students’s attention to the significances of ‘wonder’ and ‘doubt’as philosophical heuristics, and encourage them to manage the productive intellectual friction with the given daily life. ‘Philosophical Writing’ course is expected to offer students a good opportunity to cultivate such a tireless spirit of criticism in the procedures of communicative interaction through which they could constantly question the rational grounds of their common and conventional beliefs, and thereby, test and correct their ideas by their own free will.
Abstract
In recent years, ‘Philosophical Writing’ as a liberal arts course is being actively established in more and more universities in Korea. The aim of this paper is to propose a fundamental viewpoint of it on the basis of the classical conception of philosophy as ‘criticism of dailiness’. We can and must make good use of this ‘Philosophical Writing’course as a golden opportunity to return the ‘dialogue’ as the essential method of philosophizing to philosophy. And through the training of ‘Philosophical Writing’, we must continuously call students’s attention to the significances of ‘wonder’ and ‘doubt’as philosophical heuristics, and encourage them to manage the productive intellectual friction with the given daily life. ‘Philosophical Writing’ course is expected to offer students a good opportunity to cultivate such a tireless spirit of criticism in the procedures of communicative interaction through which they could constantly question the rational grounds of their common and conventional beliefs, and thereby, test and correct their ideas by their own free will.
참고문헌 (14)
- 오문석, "인문학의 위기, 인문학자의 삶, In 인문학이야기 + 토론 ‘난장’", pp.60~71 (2007), 전남대학교 인문학연구소
- 최종욱, "일상에서의 철학" (2000), 知와사랑
- Adorno, T. W., "Negative Dialektik" (1975), Suhrkamp Verlag
- Adorno, T. W., "The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture" (1991), Routledge
- 김선욱, "예루살렘의 아이히만" (2006), 한길사
- Aristotle, "형이상학" (2007), 이제이북스
- Bacon, F., "신기관: 자연의 해석과 인간의 자연 지배에 관한 잠언" (2001), 한길사
- Descartes, R., "성찰" (2011), 책세상
- Jaspers, K., "Philosophie, Bd. 2" (1932), Verlag von Julius Springer
- Kant, I., "계몽이란 무엇인가에 대한 답변, In 칸트의 역사 철학", pp.13~22 (2009), 서광사
- Lefebvre, H., "현대세계의 일상성" (2005), 기파랑
- Martens, E., "철학교육" (1988), 서광사
- Platon, Theaitetos, "Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 3", pp.147~251 (2007), Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag
- Russell, B., "왜 사람들은 싸우는가?: 행복한 사회 재건의 원칙" (2010), 비아북