본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Morphemes of PUREUDA in Korean Complex Nouns: Traits and Motivations of GRUE in Use

권연진|임동휘
인문학연구원 (Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University)|2021.12|인문과학 (The Journal of the Humanities)|제123권 |pp. 207-256|DOI 10.23017/inmun.2021.123..207

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

PUREUDA conceptGRUE concept(native/ Hanja) color morphemesKorean complex nounsreferents’ chromaticity[푸르다] 개념GRUE 개념(고유어/ 한자어 기반) 색채 형태소한국어 복합명사지시체 색도
주제분류기타인문학

초록

This research aims to examine the semantic and semiotic relationships between the GRUE morphemes and the referents’ chromaticity properties in the Korean language. To scrutinize the grue-like mechanisms of the PUREUDA-related examples, four sets of color-morpheme-specific Korean complex noun examples are investigated from a metalinguistic, metasemiotic, and metacogntive perspective. With the form [‘푸른’/ ‘파란’/ ‘파랑’/ ‘청’/ ‘녹’ (pureun/ paran/ parang/ cheong/ nok) + another morpheme(s)] and the referent-specific object/ state/ phenomenon names used in the data selection, 698 KCN examples are collected and analyzed in comparison with the relevant online picture/ video images, especially, in terms of the chromaticity properties. In the analysis, it turns out that most examples have the respective referents of multichromaticity in which a partial “green/ blue/ grue” hue or feature is present. The prevalence of the multichromatic referents is observed in all the four groups, which suggests (1) the cognitive intervention of semiotic metonymy (cf. attention or salience), (2) the metonymic extension from complex mechanisms of a referent to the linguistic form, and (3) the importance of the referent’s chromaticity, and (4) the observer’s intersemiotic translation as a factor. Unlike the mainstream presumption, the proportions of the pure “green/ blue” referents and/or the fuzzy “grue” referents turn out to be small (even 0%) with 1 exception of ‘청’ (cheong). Also, in the presence of the non-blue and non-green referents (cf. structural color, translation, etc.), it becomes clear that referent-oriented and cognitive-semiotics-based approaches are important. Elsewhere, the roles of Hanja turn out to need more attention and research. In conclusion, the Korean PUREUDA examples show semiotically, cognitively, and semantically complex phenomena with diverse traits and motivations involved. For the specification, further in-depth research is required, and a simple ‘form-content’ reading must be avoided.

Abstract

This research aims to examine the semantic and semiotic relationships between the GRUE morphemes and the referents’ chromaticity properties in the Korean language. To scrutinize the grue-like mechanisms of the PUREUDA-related examples, four sets of color-morpheme-specific Korean complex noun examples are investigated from a metalinguistic, metasemiotic, and metacogntive perspective. With the form [‘푸른’/ ‘파란’/ ‘파랑’/ ‘청’/ ‘녹’ (pureun/ paran/ parang/ cheong/ nok) + another morpheme(s)] and the referent-specific object/ state/ phenomenon names used in the data selection, 698 KCN examples are collected and analyzed in comparison with the relevant online picture/ video images, especially, in terms of the chromaticity properties. In the analysis, it turns out that most examples have the respective referents of multichromaticity in which a partial “green/ blue/ grue” hue or feature is present. The prevalence of the multichromatic referents is observed in all the four groups, which suggests (1) the cognitive intervention of semiotic metonymy (cf. attention or salience), (2) the metonymic extension from complex mechanisms of a referent to the linguistic form, and (3) the importance of the referent’s chromaticity, and (4) the observer’s intersemiotic translation as a factor. Unlike the mainstream presumption, the proportions of the pure “green/ blue” referents and/or the fuzzy “grue” referents turn out to be small (even 0%) with 1 exception of ‘청’ (cheong). Also, in the presence of the non-blue and non-green referents (cf. structural color, translation, etc.), it becomes clear that referent-oriented and cognitive-semiotics-based approaches are important. Elsewhere, the roles of Hanja turn out to need more attention and research. In conclusion, the Korean PUREUDA examples show semiotically, cognitively, and semantically complex phenomena with diverse traits and motivations involved. For the specification, further in-depth research is required, and a simple ‘form-content’ reading must be avoided.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Beon, M., "A Contrastive Study on the PUREUDA-group Color Terms in Korean and Chinese", Master’s, pp.2015
  2. Berlin, B., "Basic Color Terms : Their Universality and Evolution" (1969), University of California Press.
  3. Biggam, C., "The Semantics of Colour : A Historical Approach" (2012), Cambridge University Press.
  4. "Chinese GRUE: On the Original Meaning and Evolution of Qing" (2015)[URL]
  5. Bull, D., "Intelligent Image and Video Compression : Communicating Pictures" (2021), Elsevier.
  6. Chin, S. -L., "A Study on Translating Color Terms : With a Focus on Korean and English", Master’s, pp.2003
  7. Cho, Y. -S., "Cross-cultural Associations of Color(색채의연상)" (2017), Siru.
  8. Choi, H. -Y., "Korean Semantic-Relation-based Morphology(한국어의미관계형태론)" (2018), Yeokrak.
  9. Clifford, A., "Colour Studies: A Broad Spectrum", pp.53~66 (2014), Benjamins
  10. Elbourne, P., "Meaning : A Slim Guide to Semantics" (2011), Oxford University Press.
  11. Eom, H., "About Colour Reresentation System of Korean Colour Terms", Korean Language Education Research, 10(1), pp.429~458 (2000)
  12. 엄순천, "퉁구스어 색채어의 의미 연구: 에벤키어를 중심으로", 한국 시베리아연구, 23(1), pp.181~215 (2019), 한국-시베리아센터[DOI]
  13. 엄순천, "닙흐어의 특징과 기본 색채어의 의미", 인문사회 21, 12(1), pp.2895~2908 (2021), 인문사회 21
  14. Fairchild, M., "Color AppearanceModels" (2005), JohnWiley and Sons Ltd.
  15. Gladstone, W., "Studies on Homer and the Homeric Age" (1858), Oxford University Press.
  16. Heo, J., "Dongui Bogam", Nae EuiWon.
  17. Hong, J. -I., "AStudy on the Color Cognitive System: Focused on the Characteristic of the Linguistic Representation", Doctoral, pp.2012
  18. Jakobson, R., "On Translation", pp.232~239 (1959), Harvard University Press
  19. Jang, S. -L., "(A)Contrastive Study of 'Green", Blue' Color Words in Korean and Chinese, Kongju University, 2016
  20. Kay, P., "Synchronic Variability and Diachronic Change in Basic Color Terms", Language in Society, 4, pp.257~270 (1975)
  21. Kay, P., "Color Appearance and the Emergence and Evolution of Basic Color Lexicons", American Anthropologist, 101, pp.743~760 (1999)
  22. Kim, A., "Korean Color Terms : An Aspect of Semantic Fields and Related Phenomena", Anthropological Linguistics, 27, pp.425~436 (1985)
  23. Kim, D. -H., "Cognitive Linguistics and Meaning(인지언어학과 의미)" (2005), Taehaksa.
  24. Kim, D. -Y., "Changes in Color Attributes by Color Adjectives", Master’s, pp.2020
  25. Kim, E. -J., "Perceptual Difference Between Blue and Purple-Blue", Master’s, pp.2020
  26. Kim, G. -H., "Hanja-based Compound Words in Korean", Journal of Korean Linguistics (Gugeohak), 24, pp.467~484 (1994)
  27. 김해연, "문어 말뭉치에 나타난 색채 어휘 ‘파랗다’와 ‘푸르다’의 의미와 용법 비교 분석", 한국어 의미학, 46, pp.79~110 (2014), 한국어의미학회
  28. Kim, J. -E., "A Study on the Awareness of Color Words by Young Children and Teachers", Master’s, pp.2015
  29. 김지인, "Semantic extensions of basic color terms in English and Korean", 박사, 영어학, pp.2009
  30. 김선희, "한국어와 일본어의 기본색채어휘 분석", 일본어교육연구, (27), pp.31~44 (2013), 한국일어교육학회
  31. Semantic Structures of Nominal Compounds(명사구성합성어의의미구조), "Kim, S. -J.", KUResearch Institute of Korean Studies, ~ (2021)
  32. Ku, B. -G., "On ‘Pureuda’ and ‘Parahta’", Hankukmunkwa, 22, pp.15~50 (1998)
  33. 구본관, "한국어 색채 표현에 대한 인지언어학적 고찰", 형태론, 10(2), pp.261~285 (2008), 형태론
  34. Kumar, A., "Principles of Colour and AppearanceMeasurement : Object Appearance, Colour Perception, and Instrumental Measurement" (2014), Woodhead
  35. Kwon, Y. -J., "Meaning : A SlimGuide to Semantics(의미란무엇인가 : 의미론지침서)" (2020), Hankukmunhwasa
  36. 이현희, "색채 인지와 언어 표현의 상관성(1) －연구 방법론과 결과 분석의 사례를 중심으로－", 한말연구, (30), pp.159~191 (2012), 한말연구학회[DOI]
  37. 임수진, "푸른계열 색의 인지와 의미해석에 관한 연구: 영어, 한국어, 중국어를 중심으로", 언어과학연구, (76), pp.285~304 (2016), 언어과학회[DOI]
  38. Loh, M. -H., "Introduction to Semantics(의미론개관)" (2012), Hankukmunhwasa
  39. Magus, H., "On the Historical Evolution of the Color Sense", Kosmos, 1, pp.423~432 (1877)
  40. McLaury, R., "Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica" (1997), University of Texas Press.
  41. Oh, S., "A Contrastive Study On 'Pureuda' Category Color Terms Between Korean and Chinese", M.A., pp.2020
  42. 박현수, "한국어 색채범주의 분화에 관한 연구 - '파랑'을 중심으로 -", 한국색채학회논문집, 25(2), pp.5~15 (2011), 한국색채학회[DOI]
  43. Park, J. -G., "Korean Semantics for a Discussion-based Course(토론식강의를위한국어의미론)" (2014), Pakyijung.
  44. Park, J. -W., "A Comparative Study of Color Adjectives in Korea and China", Ph.D., pp.2021
  45. "Grue? Bleen? Rellow?" (2011)[URL]
  46. Petrilli, S., "Translation Translation" (2003), Rodopi.
  47. Rivers, W., "Primitive Colour Vision", Popular ScienceMonthly, 59, pp.44~58 (1901)
  48. Rosch, E., "Probabilities, Sampling, and Ethnographic Method : The Case of Dani Color Names", Man, 7, pp.448~466 (1972)
  49. Seok, H. -J., "Engineering of Colors(빛의공학)" (2013), Science Books
  50. 신호철, "한국어 색채 표현의 이원 체계", 문법 교육, 16, pp.173~202 (2012), 한국문법교육학회[DOI]
  51. Tao, W., "Colour Terms in Shang Oracle Bone Inscriptions. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies", University of London, 59(1), pp.63~101 (1996)
  52. 양성희, "교통 신호등 파란불과 초록불의 혼용 -‘푸르다’의 색채 범주 변화를 중심으로-", 國語學, (97), pp.341~372 (2021), 국어학회[DOI]
  53. Yo, H., "A Contrastive Study on Korean ‘Pureuda’ and Chinese ‘靑’", Master’s, pp.2016

관련 논문AI추천

푸른계열 색의 인지와 의미해석에 관한 연구: 영어, 한국어, 중국어를 중심으로임수진언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2016 · 제76호Linguistic synesthesia in Korean: A compound word-based study of cross-modal directionality김선아, 조참훈, Chu-Ren Huang한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2022 · 제39권 제2호국어 기본 색채어와 파생어의 의미와 용법에 대한 코퍼스언어학적 분석김해연한국언어학회 · 언어2014 · 제39권 제4호한국어 색채 용어의 색채와의 관계 및 계층 구조김동성, 노창화, 채희락한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2008 · 제25권 제3호汉韩颜色词的句法语义及认知分析 - 以“青”和“푸르다/파랗다”为例리우 나한국중국언어문화연구회 · 한중언어문화연구2016 · 제40호한국어 색채어 범주의 세대 간 차이와 인지 반응의 상관관계 연구: ‘곤색’과 ‘남색’ 사용을 중심으로강아름, 이규빈한국언어학회 · 언어2025 · 제50권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

디지털인문학 교육의 사례 연구: 초기 내한 선교사 사료 수업과 연계하여한미경pp. 7-39미 국무부재외공관문서 소장 선교사 편지 고찰: 1903년 해주에서 보낸 편지를 중심으로윤현숙pp. 41-78디지털 인문학 연구에서 종교철학의 역할: “내한 선교사 편지(1880-1942) 디지털 아카이브 구축” 경험을 통하여김종우pp. 79-105A Study on the Content Analysis Capabilities of Voyant Tools -Targeting the Letters of the Southern Presbyterian Missionary W. Junkin구지연pp. 107-136플립드 러닝에 기초한 온라인 중국어 독해 수업을 위한 제언김세미pp. 137-171
원문 보기