본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

들뢰즈의 사건과 야크나파타우파

Deleuze's Event and Faulkner's Yoknapatawhpa

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Deleuze is known for the philosopher of “event.” In Logic of Sense, he created the concept of event as a reverse of Platonic dichotomy. For Plato, event, or simulacrum, being at the farthest end of Idea, was so meaningless and transitory that it was oppressed for protecting Idea. Based on Stoa's definition of thing,Deleuz's event was realized not by a similarity between Idea and copy but effects between things, called metaphysical surface. Deleuze's event was especially important on understanding of the meaning of literary works. Because the final result of event was a signification of event, it was necessarily expressed by a language. In terms of Deleuze's event, Faulkner's Yoknapatawhpa was not a space of representation, but a space created through ‘a bloc of sensations’ in American South. In other word, Faulkner did not represent the real people, accidents, and things, but create the imaginative space in the real South. In this sense, the most importance things in Faulkner's texts were of expressions on the various aspects of affects in the reponses between white American and Afro-American and their percepts on the reactions to things. Such affects and percepts created a large view of Yoknapatawhpa ruled by racial, social, and moral entities.

Abstract

Deleuze is known for the philosopher of “event.” In Logic of Sense, he created the concept of event as a reverse of Platonic dichotomy. For Plato, event, or simulacrum, being at the farthest end of Idea, was so meaningless and transitory that it was oppressed for protecting Idea. Based on Stoa's definition of thing,Deleuz's event was realized not by a similarity between Idea and copy but effects between things, called metaphysical surface. Deleuze's event was especially important on understanding of the meaning of literary works. Because the final result of event was a signification of event, it was necessarily expressed by a language. In terms of Deleuze's event, Faulkner's Yoknapatawhpa was not a space of representation, but a space created through ‘a bloc of sensations’ in American South. In other word, Faulkner did not represent the real people, accidents, and things, but create the imaginative space in the real South. In this sense, the most importance things in Faulkner's texts were of expressions on the various aspects of affects in the reponses between white American and Afro-American and their percepts on the reactions to things. Such affects and percepts created a large view of Yoknapatawhpa ruled by racial, social, and moral entities.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 질 들뢰즈, "프루스트와 기호들" (1997), 민음사
  2. 질 들뢰즈, "의미의 논리" (1999), 한길사
  3. 이정우, "접힘과 펼쳐짐: 라이프니츠, 현대과학, 易" (2000), 거름
  4. 클레어 콜브록, "질 들뢰즈" (2004), 태학사
  5. Deleuze, Gilles, "Logic of Sense" (1990), Columbia UP
  6. Delezue, Gills, "F́élix What Is Philosophy?. High Tomlison" (1994), Columbia UP
  7. Faulkner, William, "The Sound and the Fury" (1984), Penguin Books
  8. Massumi, Brian, "“The Autonomy of Affect,” Deleuze: A Critical Reader", pp.217~239 (1996), Blackwell
  9. Massumi, Brian, "“Sensing the virtual, building the insensible,” Deleuze and Guattari: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers" (2001), Routledge
  10. Kerr, Elizabeth M., "Yoknapatawpha: Faulkner's “Little Postage Stamp of Native Soil”" (1976), Fordham UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)