국제법의 국내 적용에 관한 중국법체계
Chinese Legal System on Domestic Application of International Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Constitution of People’s Republic of China does not clearly regulate the relations between international law and domestic law. However, Chinese Civil Law and some other laws stipulate that direct implementation of international law to a national legal system and treaty which China concluded with precedes national laws. After entering into WTO, how China applies WTO, as a treaty, has been an issue not only in China but also in other members of WTO. The paper shows how treaty is classified in Chinese Constitution and laws, and what is its effect grade. The paper tries to correct understanding that treaty China concluded with always precedes domestic laws grounded on Article 142 of Civil law. That is because first, Civil law is just particular regulations as an individual law. Second, treaty on the article 142 of Civil law only includes treaties ratified by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. Third, Constitution, Law on Legislation of the People’s Republic of China and Law of the people’s Republic of China on the Procedure of the Conclusion of Treaties do not stipulate the relationship between international law and domestic law. The paper also analyzes Chinese legal system on domestic application of treaty. China has treated domestic application of treaty case by case, and taken different application theory in different situations. Based upon Chinese current legislation and judicial system, it takes two different modes which are direct and indirect application when they apply treaty. The Chinese court keeps its attitude that WTO agreement can not be applied directly. In other words, private individual cannot litigate to the court using the WTO rules, and the court cannot use WTO rules as a ground of trial, either. It is also important to know how to apply custom law in China. Custom law can be applied only when domestic law and international treaty do not exist.
Abstract
The Constitution of People’s Republic of China does not clearly regulate the relations between international law and domestic law. However, Chinese Civil Law and some other laws stipulate that direct implementation of international law to a national legal system and treaty which China concluded with precedes national laws. After entering into WTO, how China applies WTO, as a treaty, has been an issue not only in China but also in other members of WTO. The paper shows how treaty is classified in Chinese Constitution and laws, and what is its effect grade. The paper tries to correct understanding that treaty China concluded with always precedes domestic laws grounded on Article 142 of Civil law. That is because first, Civil law is just particular regulations as an individual law. Second, treaty on the article 142 of Civil law only includes treaties ratified by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. Third, Constitution, Law on Legislation of the People’s Republic of China and Law of the people’s Republic of China on the Procedure of the Conclusion of Treaties do not stipulate the relationship between international law and domestic law. The paper also analyzes Chinese legal system on domestic application of treaty. China has treated domestic application of treaty case by case, and taken different application theory in different situations. Based upon Chinese current legislation and judicial system, it takes two different modes which are direct and indirect application when they apply treaty. The Chinese court keeps its attitude that WTO agreement can not be applied directly. In other words, private individual cannot litigate to the court using the WTO rules, and the court cannot use WTO rules as a ground of trial, either. It is also important to know how to apply custom law in China. Custom law can be applied only when domestic law and international treaty do not exist.
참고문헌 (29)
- 车丕照, "论条约在我国的适用", 国际法学 (2008)
- 覃海逢, "浅析WTO规则在我国的法律适用", 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 18(6) (2003)
- 陈永胜, "论条约的适用", 法制研究, 20(2) (2006)
- 赵大光, "“入世”后我国司法审查工作的若干问题", 法律适用, (S1) (2001)
- 于明, "中国加入世界贸易组织对人民法院审判工作的影响及对策调研报告", 法律适用, (S1) (2001)
- 于明, "WTO规则在我国法院的适用问题", 法律适用, (S1) (2001)
- 贺小勇, "试论WTO协定在我国法院的适用问题", 当代法学, (9) (2001)
- 黄涧秋, "论WTO协定在国内法院的适用", 社会科学, (9) (2001)
- 张艾清, "WTO协定在我国法院实施的若干问题探析", 贵州民族学院学报, (1) (2003)
- "最高人民法院关于执行中外司法协助协定的通知, 中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报, 1988年01期", ~ (1988)
- 孙南申, "从中国入世看WT0协议在中国法院的适用", 法律适用, (9) (2000)
- 王秋良, "“入世”对我国法院法律适用的影响", 上海市政法管理干部学院学报, (1) (2002)
- 耿宝建, "入世后的行政诉讼与WTO规则的适用", 世界贸易组织动态与研究, (5) (2003)
- 侯连琦, "论我国宪法中有关国际条约适用的缺矢", 江南大学学报, 7(1) (2008)
- 贺小勇, "试论WTO协定在我国法院的适用问题", 当代法学, (9) (2001)
- 贺小勇, "论WTO协定与国内法的法律关系问题", 政法论丛, (1) (2001)
- 董国路, "国际法在中国的适用", 武汉大学学报, 55(3) (2002)
- 王铁崖, "国际法" (1995), 法律出版社
- 唐颖侠, "国际法与国内法的关系及国际条约在中国国内法的适用", 社会科学战线, (1) (2003)
- John H. Jackson, "Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal System", AJIL, 86 (1992)
- 강병근, "국제법의 국내 적용에 관한 영국의 법체계와 경험", 국제법평론, (28), pp.41~65 (2008), 국제법평론회
- 김대순, "국제법론" (2008), 삼영사
- 김정균, "국제법" (2005), 박영사
- 강효백, "내국민원칙에 따른 중국외자법제 논의와 전망", 통상법률 (2006)
- 강효백, "중국법통론" (2006), 경희대학교 출판국
- 이규철, "중국경제통상법" (2006), 진원사
- 이영신, "CISG의 중국에서의 적용에 관한 고찰", 법과 정책, 14(2) (2008), 제주대학교법과 정책연구소
- 허운학, "중국투자에 필요한 중국법 해설" (2002), 매일경제신문사
