당대 중국 人文精神 담론의 원형과 지식인의 위상 연구
A Study on the Archetype of Chinese Humanism and the Status of Intellect in Contemporary China
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Controversy of Contemporary Chinese Humanism derived from 6.4 Tian’anmen Event in 1989 and the Statement of Nanxun in 1992. At that time, exteriorly this controversy was likely to take the form of criticism on ridicule literature and sensual art. But actually it has symbolic significance for satire on widespread economism and almighty utilitarianism in China in the early-middle 90s. The concept of Chinese Humanism is characterized by being collected and commanded through the subject “intellectual”, not by its framework’s being in philosophy or thought. Discourse of the humanist explaining the prototype of humanism through Dao’s tradition is very peculiar. If Political Tradition represents secular region, and Academic Tradition - individual areas, then Dao’s Tradition is such a symbol as a window for resource providing and an independent open space aiming at control and communication between these two fields, at the same time. Through the statement in the 2000s of Wangxiaoming who looked back on the phases of the 90s, it became clear that the discourse on Humanism in the middle 90s was not limited to literature and movie areas. What he has intended to symbolize through the discourse is the rapid change of the times caused by the Statement of Nanxun, distorted social ethos due to the Tian’anmen Protests and contorted Chinese exceptional ‘Modernization’ that newly emerged in such conditions.
Abstract
The Controversy of Contemporary Chinese Humanism derived from 6.4 Tian’anmen Event in 1989 and the Statement of Nanxun in 1992. At that time, exteriorly this controversy was likely to take the form of criticism on ridicule literature and sensual art. But actually it has symbolic significance for satire on widespread economism and almighty utilitarianism in China in the early-middle 90s. The concept of Chinese Humanism is characterized by being collected and commanded through the subject “intellectual”, not by its framework’s being in philosophy or thought. Discourse of the humanist explaining the prototype of humanism through Dao’s tradition is very peculiar. If Political Tradition represents secular region, and Academic Tradition - individual areas, then Dao’s Tradition is such a symbol as a window for resource providing and an independent open space aiming at control and communication between these two fields, at the same time. Through the statement in the 2000s of Wangxiaoming who looked back on the phases of the 90s, it became clear that the discourse on Humanism in the middle 90s was not limited to literature and movie areas. What he has intended to symbolize through the discourse is the rapid change of the times caused by the Statement of Nanxun, distorted social ethos due to the Tian’anmen Protests and contorted Chinese exceptional ‘Modernization’ that newly emerged in such conditions.
참고문헌 (29)
- 王彬彬, "我們需要怎樣的人文精神", 讀書, 6 (1994)
- 許紀霖, "道統, 學統與政統", 讀書, 5 (1994)
- 張汝倫, "人文精神 : 是否可能和如何可能", 讀書, 5 (1994)
- 王曉明, "曠野上的廢墟 - 文學和人文精神的危機", 上海文學, 6 (1993)
- 王曉明, "面對當代生活的挑戰", 文學評論, 2 (2002)
- 王曉明, "文化硏究與新的文化現實", 上海大學學報, 1 (2007)
- 王曉明, "人文精神討論十年祭", 上海交通大學學報, 1 (2004), 哲學社會科學版
- 王曉明, "走出文學困境和精神困境", 讀書, 10 (1997)
- 王曉明, "知識分子的新文化傳統與當代立場", 香港中文大學演講, ~ (1996)
- 陳思和, "知識分子的轉型與新文學的兩種思潮", 社會科學, 1 (2003)
- 陳思和, "我往何處去-新文化傳統與當代知識分子的文化認同", 文藝理論硏究, 3 (1996)
- 陳思和, "知識分子的轉型與新文學的兩種思潮", 社會科學, 1 (2003)
- 解麗霞, "近二十年來的人文精神硏究", 華南理工大學學報, ~ (2006)
- 汪暉, "고뇌하는 중국 : 현대 중국 지식인의 담론과 중국 현실" (2005), 길
- 黃宗羲, "黃宗羲全集 In 宋元學案" (1992), 浙江古籍出版社
- 宋建林, "對人文精神討論的反思", 北京社會科學, 2 (2002)
- 王蒙, "人文精神問題偶感" (1994), 東方
- 平飛, "近十年來人文精神硏究的知識社會學考察", 社會科學論壇 (2006)
- 徐友漁, "人文精神討論", 社會科學論壇, 4 (2005)
- 박승현, "중국 현대문화에 있어서 '인문정신'논쟁-90년대 중국문화현상을 중심으로-", 철학탐구, 16, pp.111~152 (2004), 중앙철학연구소
- 백승욱, "신자유주의와 중국지식인의 길 찾기", 역사비평, (여름) (2001)
- 백원담, "인문학의 위기" (1999), 푸른 숲
- 백원담, "90년대 중국의 문화현실과 문화정책", 민족예술, (51) (1999)
- 馮友蘭, "중국철학사" (2004), 형설출판사
- 이욱연, "중국지식인의 인식변화 : 80년대와 90년대", 역사비평, 36 (1997)
- 심혜영, "변화하는 현실과 인문정신 : 중국편", 오늘의 문예비평, 32 (1999)
- 심혜영, "중국의 90년대 인문정신 논의에 관한 고찰", 중국문학, 29 (1998)
- 汪暉, "근대성의 역설-중국, 근대성, 전지구화", 진보평론, (6) (2000)
- 유세종, "현대 중국에서의 계몽의 성격과 지식인의 역할", 중국어문논역총간, 2 (1998)
