본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

존 로크와 복종의 영역들:로크의 자유주의에 대한 재해석

John Locke and the Spheres of Obedience:Reinterpreting Locke’s Liberalism

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This essay is reinterpreting Locke’s political thought thoroughly as an attempt to separate the spheres of obedience, that is, family, state, and church. In his Two Treatises of Government and Epistola de Tolerantia Locke is pursuing vigorously to separate the spheres and the obligations appropriate to each sphere: filial duty, political obligation based on subject’s consent, and religious obedience solely to God. These liberal features of Locke’s political thought are best understood in contrast with Filmer’s and his intellectual ancestors’ familial analogies of political power. Separating the different spheres of obedience Locke makes not only politics free from family or religion, but also religion from family or politics. In this sense, Locke’s Liberalism is “the art of separation”.

Abstract

This essay is reinterpreting Locke’s political thought thoroughly as an attempt to separate the spheres of obedience, that is, family, state, and church. In his Two Treatises of Government and Epistola de Tolerantia Locke is pursuing vigorously to separate the spheres and the obligations appropriate to each sphere: filial duty, political obligation based on subject’s consent, and religious obedience solely to God. These liberal features of Locke’s political thought are best understood in contrast with Filmer’s and his intellectual ancestors’ familial analogies of political power. Separating the different spheres of obedience Locke makes not only politics free from family or religion, but also religion from family or politics. In this sense, Locke’s Liberalism is “the art of separation”.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 강정인, "로크사상의 현대적 재조명: 로크의 재산권 이론에 대한 유럽중심주의적 해석을 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 32(3), pp.53~75 (1998)
  2. 공진성, "스피노자, 관용, 그리고 종교적 불복종의 문제", 정치사상연구, 13(2), pp.102~131 (2007), 한국정치사상학회
  3. 공진성, "토마스 아퀴나스: 신의 창조 안에서 정치의 자율성을 옹호한 사상가, in 서양 고대ㆍ중세 정치사상사", pp.348~380 (2011), 책세상
  4. 김용규, "데칼로그" (2002), 바다출판사
  5. 문지영, "자유주의와 근대 민주주의 국가: 명예혁명의 정치사상", 한국정치학회보, 45(1), pp.35~60 (2011), 한국정치학회
  6. 박동천, "존 스튜어트 밀의 자유주의와 제국주의: 실존과 시의의 관점에서", 국제정치논총, 50(4), pp.29~54 (2010), 한국국제정치학회
  7. 송규범, "<<정부론>> 저술과 관련한 몇 가지 쟁점", 영국연구, (18), pp.125~155 (2007), 영국사학회
  8. 이정우, "질 들뢰즈, ‘철학자들 중의 철학자’", 철학과 현실, (28), pp.138~148 (1996)
  9. 임승휘, "장 보댕의 국가론 과 절대주의", 프랑스사 연구, (13), pp.133~159 (2005), 한국프랑스사학회
  10. Aristoteles, "정치학" (2009), 숲
  11. Ashcraft, Richard, "Revolutionary Politics and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government: Radicalism and Lockean Political Theory", Political Theory, 8(4) (1980)
  12. Bermbach, Udo, "Widerstandsrecht, Souveränität, Kirche und Staat: Frankreich und Spanien im 16. Jahrhundert, in Pipers Handbuch der politischen Ideen. Band 3 Neuzeit: Von den Konfessionskriegen bis zur Aufklärung" (1985), Piper
  13. Bodin, Jean, "Six Books of the commonwealth, abr" (1951), Basil Blackwel
  14. Butler, Melissa A., "초기 자유주의적 페미니즘의 근원: 존 로크의 가부장주의 비판, in 페미니즘 정치사상사", pp.125~156 (2004), 이후
  15. Calvin, Johan, "칼빈의 십계명 설교" (1991), 성광문화사
  16. Calvin, Johan, "기독교 강요" (2003), 크리스챤다이제스트
  17. Dunn, John, "The Political Thought of John Locke" (1969), Cambridge University Press
  18. Dunn, John, "로크의 사상, in 로크의 이해" (1995), 문학과지성사
  19. Filmer, Sir Robert, "Patriarcha and Other Writings" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  20. Laslett, Peter, "The English Revolution and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government", Cambridge Historical Journal, 12(1) (1956)
  21. Laslett, Peter, "The World We Have Lost" (1965), Charles Scribner’s Sons
  22. Leites, Edmund, "Locke’s Liberal Theory of Parenthood, in John Locke: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1979" (1981), de Gruyter
  23. Locke, John, "통치론(제2론)" (1996), 까치
  24. Locke, John, "관용에 관한 편지" (2008), 책세상
  25. MacPherson, C. B., "홉스와 로크의 사회철학: 소유적 개인주의의 정치이론" (1990), 박영사
  26. Maloy, J. S., "The Aristotelianism of Locke’s Politics", Journal of the History of Ideas, 70(2), pp.235~257 (2009)
  27. Platon, "정치가" (2000), 한길사
  28. Schochet, Gordon J., "Patriarchalism in Political Thought" (1975), Basic Books
  29. Sommerville, J. P., "From Suarez to Filmer: A Reapraisal", The Historical Journal, 23(3), pp.525~540 (1982)
  30. Suárez, Francisco, "Selections from Three Works of Francisco Suárez, in Vol. II: An English Version of the Texts" (1944), Clarendon
  31. Walzer, Michael, "The Revolution of the Saints: A Study in the Origins of Radical Politics", pp.148~198 (1965), Harvard University Press
  32. Walzer, Michael, "Response, in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality", pp.281~297 (1995), Oxford University Press
  33. Walzer, Michael, "정의와 다원적 평등: 정의의 영역들" (1999), 철학과현실사
  34. Walzer, Michael, "자유주의와 분리의 기술, in 정치철 학에세이", pp.123~148 (2009), 모티브북
  35. Welzel, Hans, "자연법과 실질적 정의" (2001), 삼영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)