본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

건국신화를 아기장수설화의 서사각색으로 보는 새로운 관점: 건국시조의 사회부조화성(社會不調和性)과 분리(分離)·이주(移住)의 문제

A new viewpoint to regulate foundation myth as Akijangsu legend narrative’s antistructure

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

This study was attempted to suggest a new viewpoint to regulate foundationmyth as Akijangsu legend narrative’s antistructure. The problem is thatAkijangsu legend has been regulated as reversed narrative of foundation mythin precedent research history. Following this viewpoint, it is impossible toexplain context that Gangchaeyoon’s Akijangsu narrative is collected in Sejong’ssovereign myth. But Gangchaeyoon is changed as helper to found ideology orderand his Akijangsu narrative is collected in sovereign myth’s context. Thereforein this point it is necessary to sound out foundation possibility of new thesisthe found myth is reversed narrative of Akijangsu legend. Choosing thisstandpoint, it is possible to regulate Sejong’s sovereign myth as narrativedramatization of successful Akijangsu legend. At the same time it is possibleto regulate Cheongkijun as Akijangsu that was situated in Sejong’s sovereignmyth as antagonist, competing and failing with Sejong to replace existing orderby own ideological order. This study investigated that found myth is reversednarrative of Akijangsu legend.

Abstract

This study was attempted to suggest a new viewpoint to regulate foundationmyth as Akijangsu legend narrative’s antistructure. The problem is thatAkijangsu legend has been regulated as reversed narrative of foundation mythin precedent research history. Following this viewpoint, it is impossible toexplain context that Gangchaeyoon’s Akijangsu narrative is collected in Sejong’ssovereign myth. But Gangchaeyoon is changed as helper to found ideology orderand his Akijangsu narrative is collected in sovereign myth’s context. Thereforein this point it is necessary to sound out foundation possibility of new thesisthe found myth is reversed narrative of Akijangsu legend. Choosing thisstandpoint, it is possible to regulate Sejong’s sovereign myth as narrativedramatization of successful Akijangsu legend. At the same time it is possibleto regulate Cheongkijun as Akijangsu that was situated in Sejong’s sovereignmyth as antagonist, competing and failing with Sejong to replace existing orderby own ideological order. This study investigated that found myth is reversednarrative of Akijangsu legend.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 강유리, "아기장수 설화 연구:이데올로기 수용의 관점에서", 한국고전연구, 2, pp.260~289 (1996), 한국고전연구학회
  2. 고선희, "드라마 <뿌리 깊은 나무>의 판타지성과 하위주체 발화 양상", 국제어문, (55), pp.75~115 (2012), 국제어문학회
  3. 곽정식, "아기장수 전설과 洪吉童傳의 比較 考察", 문화전통논집, 1, pp.53~66 (1993), 경성대학교 한국학연구소
  4. 권도경, "아기장수전설의 서사가지(narrative tree)와 역사적 트라우마 극복의 선택지, 그리고 드라마 <각시탈>의 아기장수전설 새로 쓰기", 국어국문학, (163), pp.279~313 (2013), 국어국문학회
  5. 권도경, "건국신화적 문화영웅일대기와 드라마 <뿌리 깊은 나무>", 국제어문, (60), pp.329~364 (2014), 국제어문학회
  6. 김영희, "아기장수이야기의 신화적 주제 탐색", 구비문학연구, 10, pp.53~86 (2000), 한국구비문학회
  7. 김종태, "역사서사물 『뿌리 깊은 나무』의 서사 전략", 한국문학이론과 비평, 17(1), pp.335~355 (2013), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  8. 신동흔, "아기장수 설화와 진인출현설의 관계", 고전문학연구, 5, pp.103~125 (1990), 한국고전문학회
  9. 이혜화, "「아기장수 傳說」의 新考察:韓國的 超人의 悲劇과 그 背景", 한국민속학, 16, pp.265~285 (1983), 한국민속학회
  10. 임철호, "아기장수설화의 전승과 『홍길동전』", 천잠어문학, 12, pp.9~38 (1997), 전주대학교 국어교육과
  11. 임철호, "아기장수설화의 전승과:아기장수설화와 홍길동전(2)", 구비문학연구, 4, pp.1~33 (1997), 한국구비문학회
  12. 천혜숙, "아기장수 전설의 形成과 意味", 한국학논집, 13, pp.133~151 (1986), 계명대학교 한국학연구소
  13. 최래옥, "한국구비전설의 연구", pp.151~ (1981), 일조각
  14. 현용준, "제주도 전설", pp.107~114 (1976), 서문당

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)