본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한 · 중 건국 시조신화 비교 연구 - 상고시대 신화를 중심으로 -

A Comparative Study of the Founding myths between Korea and China : Focusing on the Ancient myth

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study is to compare the founding myths between Korea and China. Thirteen founding myths from two countries were analyzed for this study. The feature of the founding myths was examined and then common points and differences of two countries' founding myths were studied. The result is as following. There are two common points between Korea and China founding myths. First, it is diversity. The way the characters appear and come into the world is various. Second, it is a growth process. The way the characters grow up has the same pattern. After the character in the myths is born in a marvelous way, he is abandoned, protected by animals and then comes back to become a great man and make a succeed through many struggles. There are three different things in the myths. First, while the characters in Korean myth usually come down from heaven, or come up from earth, or they are recognized by sunlight, in Chinese myths they appear by having holy relations with God symbolized such as lightening, footprints, a dragon, rainbows. Second, in Korea the motif of the myths consists of the god of heaven! and the goddess of earth having a holy marriage, but in China there is an ordinary marriage motif. This means the maternal side had a different statue in two countries. Third, while there are various motives which are related to death because of the influence of Confucianism, hermit worship, shamanism in Korea, Chinese myths show more Confucian influence than Taoism. This is due to the cultural and ideological difference between the two countries. Korean founding myths include similar motives repeatedly, which means that the myth transmitter wanted to retain its original form even in its diversity. On the other hand, Chinese founding myths are various but lack motives, since the myth transmitter sought to unify its original form into Confucianism with diversity.

Abstract

This study is to compare the founding myths between Korea and China. Thirteen founding myths from two countries were analyzed for this study. The feature of the founding myths was examined and then common points and differences of two countries' founding myths were studied. The result is as following. There are two common points between Korea and China founding myths. First, it is diversity. The way the characters appear and come into the world is various. Second, it is a growth process. The way the characters grow up has the same pattern. After the character in the myths is born in a marvelous way, he is abandoned, protected by animals and then comes back to become a great man and make a succeed through many struggles. There are three different things in the myths. First, while the characters in Korean myth usually come down from heaven, or come up from earth, or they are recognized by sunlight, in Chinese myths they appear by having holy relations with God symbolized such as lightening, footprints, a dragon, rainbows. Second, in Korea the motif of the myths consists of the god of heaven! and the goddess of earth having a holy marriage, but in China there is an ordinary marriage motif. This means the maternal side had a different statue in two countries. Third, while there are various motives which are related to death because of the influence of Confucianism, hermit worship, shamanism in Korea, Chinese myths show more Confucian influence than Taoism. This is due to the cultural and ideological difference between the two countries. Korean founding myths include similar motives repeatedly, which means that the myth transmitter wanted to retain its original form even in its diversity. On the other hand, Chinese founding myths are various but lack motives, since the myth transmitter sought to unify its original form into Confucianism with diversity.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 김열규, "韓國民俗과 文學硏究" (1993), 일조각
  2. 김태곤, "韓國巫俗硏究" (1995), 집문당
  3. 김화경, "한국 신화의 원류" (2005), 지식산업사
  4. 나경수, "韓國의 神話 硏究" (1993), 교문사
  5. 박정양, "중국문학사1" (1997), 연변대학출판사
  6. 三品彰英, "三品彰英全集 3권" (1971), 平民社
  7. 서대석, "한국 신화의 연구" (2001), 집문당
  8. 서정범, "國語語源辭典(한국어원학회연구총서 1)" (2001), 보고사
  9. 욜란디 아코비, "칼 융의 심리학" (1978), 成文閣
  10. 윤내현, "商王朝史의 硏究" (1978), 경인문화사
  11. 윤내현, "商周史" (1990), 민음사
  12. 이기백, "韓國傳統文化論" (2002), 일조각
  13. 李春植, "中國史序說" (1991), 교보문고
  14. 장덕순, "구비문학개설" (1993), 一潮閣
  15. 조동일, "한국문학통사 1" (1996), 지식산업사
  16. 최남선, "增補 三國遺事" (1983), 서문문화사
  17. 한우근, "韓國通史" (1992), 을유문화사
  18. Eric W. Rothenbuhler, "Ritual Communication -From Everyday Comversation to Mediated Ceremony" (1988), Sage Publications
  19. Joseph Campbell, "The Hero with a thousand Faces" (1968)
  20. 나희라, "신라의 건국 신화와 의례", 한국고대역사연구, 39, pp.61~ (2005), 한국고대사학회
  21. 박대복, "建國神話의 天觀念과 巫觀念", 語文硏究, 32(3), pp.222~ (2004)
  22. 박현숙, "백제 건국신화의 형성과정과 그 의미", 한국고대사연구, 39, pp.32~ (2002), 한국고대사학회
  23. 오세정, "건국신화의 제의적 서사구조 연구", 한국고전연구, 9, pp.286~290 (2003), 한국고전연구학회
  24. 柳東植, "神話와 儀禮에서 본 古代韓國人의 信仰形態", 한국종교학, 1, pp.22~ (1972)
  25. 윤성용, "고구려 建國神話와 祭儀", 한국고대사연구, 39(39), pp.5~30 (2005), 한국고대사학회
  26. 이복규, "동명 신화와 주몽 신화의 관계에 대한 연구 성과 검토", 국제어문, 12, pp.199~222 (1991), 국제어문학연구회
  27. 이복규, "夫餘 建國 神話의 시대별 인식 양상", 국어교육, pp.344~351 (1995), 한국어교육
  28. 임재해, "맥락적 해석에 의한 김알지 신화와 신라문화의 정체성 재인식", 비교민속학, 33, pp.594~ (2007), 비교민속학회
  29. 서유원, "中國 始祖神話의 특징과 玄鳥神話의 고찰", 中國語文論譯叢刊, 13, pp.39~ (2004), 중국어문논역학회
  30. 서유원, "中國 古代 주요 始祖說話 중 棄子神話에 보이는 遺棄 모티브의 연구", 중어중문학, 17, pp.5~ (1995), 한국중어중문학회
  31. 서유원, "한중 신검신화에 보이는 신검의 상징성 연구", 중국어문논역총간, (17), pp.21~44 (2006), 중국어문논역학회
  32. 장주근, "구전신화와 문헌화 과정 -제주도 당신본풀이의 삼성신화를 중심으로 의민 이두현 교수 정년퇴임 기념 논문집", 선청어문, pp.82~ (1989), 서울대 국어교육과
  33. 정진희, "일반논문: 朝鮮初 濟州 <三姓神話>의 문자화 양상과 그 의미", 고전문학연구, 30(30), pp.251~285 (2006), 한국고전문학회
  34. 조태영, "한국 난생 신화와 한국문학의 원형", 한신인문학연구, 2, pp.6~ (2001)
  35. 현용준, "삼성신화연구", 탐라문화, (2), pp.83~84 (1983), 탐라문화연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)