본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보편성에 따른 한국어와 태국어의 음운대조

Phonological Contrast between Korean and Thai in Terms of Language Universality

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

Phonological Contrast between Korean and Thai in Terms ofLanguage UniversalityKim, Seon-JungThis paper aims to contrast phonology of Korean and Thai in terms oflanguage universality. Considering consonants, both languages having 21typologically most plausible consonants display high universality in the numberof consonants. However, Thai shows higher universality in regards to theirsubstance, i.e. it differs from Korean when it comes to the structure of plosivesand fricatives. Both Korean and Thai show similarities regarding the plosivesdue to the fact that both languages possess three contrastive consonants. However, the Thai plosives consist of plain voiced, plain voiceless and aspiratedvoiceless sounds that have higher universality than the Korean plosives whichare plain voiced, plain voiceless and aspirated voiceless. In case of vowels, both Korean with its 10 vowels and Thai with its 9 vowelsshow lower universality when it comes to the total number of vowels. However,all of those vowels belong to the list of most plausible vowels which makes theiruniversality higher in substance. In respect of syllable structure, Korean with its CVC type shows a moderatelycomplex structure while Thai with its CCVC type has a complex structure. Thecoda may consist of only one consonant in each language but onset is composedof one consonant in Korean, and two consonants in Thai. The contrastive study of similarities and differences between Korean and Thaiin terms of phonology will help not only understand the two languages but alsoprovide useful information for increasing the efficacy of Korean languageeducation for Thai learners of Korean whose number is rapidly increasing.

Abstract

Phonological Contrast between Korean and Thai in Terms ofLanguage UniversalityKim, Seon-JungThis paper aims to contrast phonology of Korean and Thai in terms oflanguage universality. Considering consonants, both languages having 21typologically most plausible consonants display high universality in the numberof consonants. However, Thai shows higher universality in regards to theirsubstance, i.e. it differs from Korean when it comes to the structure of plosivesand fricatives. Both Korean and Thai show similarities regarding the plosivesdue to the fact that both languages possess three contrastive consonants. However, the Thai plosives consist of plain voiced, plain voiceless and aspiratedvoiceless sounds that have higher universality than the Korean plosives whichare plain voiced, plain voiceless and aspirated voiceless. In case of vowels, both Korean with its 10 vowels and Thai with its 9 vowelsshow lower universality when it comes to the total number of vowels. However,all of those vowels belong to the list of most plausible vowels which makes theiruniversality higher in substance. In respect of syllable structure, Korean with its CVC type shows a moderatelycomplex structure while Thai with its CCVC type has a complex structure. Thecoda may consist of only one consonant in each language but onset is composedof one consonant in Korean, and two consonants in Thai. The contrastive study of similarities and differences between Korean and Thaiin terms of phonology will help not only understand the two languages but alsoprovide useful information for increasing the efficacy of Korean languageeducation for Thai learners of Korean whose number is rapidly increasing.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 김선정, "한국어와 영어 대조 분석, 대조분석과 학습자 오류 분석", 제7회 한국어교육 학술대회 논문집, pp.3~25 (2011), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원
  2. 껀나파 분마럿, "태국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 발음 교육 방안 : 종성 발음을 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육학과, pp.2013
  3. 이철재, "한국어와 태국어의 음운 현상 대조 연구", 석사, Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, pp.2008
  4. 시무앙 케와린, "태국 한국어 학습자를 위한 한국어 말하기 교육 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2005
  5. 허용, "동남아시아 언어의 자음체계 대조 연구: 말레이어, 타이어, 버마어를 중심으로", 언어과학연구, 343(63), pp.343~368 (2012), 언어과학회
  6. 허용, "중간언어 음운론을 위한 모음 연구", 이중언어학, 309(25), pp.309~330 (2004), 이중언어학회
  7. 허용, "중간언어 음운론을 위한 자음 연구", 한국어교육, 19(1), pp.361~378 (2008), 국제한국어교육학회
  8. 허용, "한국어 자음 체계의 유형적 보편성 연구", 이중언어학, 331(45), pp.331~351 (2011), 이중언어학회
  9. 김선정, "대조언어학" (2013), 소통
  10. 김선정, "음운론 이해" (2005), 동인
  11. HASPELMATH, Martin, "The World Atlas of Language Structures" (2005), Oxford University Press
  12. LINDBLOM, Biorn, "Speech, and Mind: Studies in Honour of Victoria A", pp.62~78 (1988), Routledge Kegan & Paul
  13. Working Papers in Phonetics 50, "MADDIESON, Ian", UCLA, 57~68, pp.Working Papers in Phonetics 50 (1980)
  14. MADDIESON, Ian, "Patterns of Sounds" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  15. PANKHUENKHAT, Ruengdet, "Thai Linguistics" (1988), กรุ งเทพฯ: โรงพิม ์พ มหาจุ ฬาลงกรณราช วิ ทยาลัย
  16. SCHWARTZ, Jean-Luc, "Major trends in vowel system inventories", Journal of Phonetics, 25, pp.233~253 (1997)
  17. "The World Atlas of Language Structures Online"[URL]
  18. "Wikipedia"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)