본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어와 태국어 의성어에 관한 연구

A Study on the Onomatopoeias of the Korean and the Thai

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted on the onomatopoeias of the Korean and the Thai. The results show that Korean onomatopoeias have the most plosives, followed by affricates, and fricatives, and have extremely few nasals or assonants. Also, usual sounds and tense sounds are many and strong sounds are relatively few. The Thai language also has the most plosives, followed by fricatives, and relatively few affricates and assonants. However, Thai language was found to have far more tense sounds than strong sounds. In the distribution of onomatopoeias of the Korean language, there are many onomatopoeias with two syllables and four syllables, whereas the Thai language have the most onomatopoeias with one syllable. It appears to be because the pure Thai is a single syllable language made up of one syllable. When onomatopoeias are classified according to the object that makes sound, the two languages all have the most sounds made by things, followed by the sounds made by humans, but the sounds made by animals or nature are relatively very few. In the case of the Korean, the prefix consonants are classified into usual sounds, tense sounds, and strong sonds, and through these sounds, strong and weak nuances are expressed, and more diverse nuaces can be expressed acoording to consonant repalacement. Also, through final consonants, diverse nuance expressions according to the kinds of consonants can be made. Vowels are also classified into positive vowels and negative vowels, and through the vowel replacement, diverse nuances such as big and small, strong and weak, heavy and light, wide and anarrow can be expressed. In the case of the Thai, different nuances according to the properties of consonants can be expressed, and in the case of vowels, nuance expressions such as big and small, heavy and light can be expressed through vowel replacement in the dialects of some regions.

Abstract

In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted on the onomatopoeias of the Korean and the Thai. The results show that Korean onomatopoeias have the most plosives, followed by affricates, and fricatives, and have extremely few nasals or assonants. Also, usual sounds and tense sounds are many and strong sounds are relatively few. The Thai language also has the most plosives, followed by fricatives, and relatively few affricates and assonants. However, Thai language was found to have far more tense sounds than strong sounds. In the distribution of onomatopoeias of the Korean language, there are many onomatopoeias with two syllables and four syllables, whereas the Thai language have the most onomatopoeias with one syllable. It appears to be because the pure Thai is a single syllable language made up of one syllable. When onomatopoeias are classified according to the object that makes sound, the two languages all have the most sounds made by things, followed by the sounds made by humans, but the sounds made by animals or nature are relatively very few. In the case of the Korean, the prefix consonants are classified into usual sounds, tense sounds, and strong sonds, and through these sounds, strong and weak nuances are expressed, and more diverse nuaces can be expressed acoording to consonant repalacement. Also, through final consonants, diverse nuance expressions according to the kinds of consonants can be made. Vowels are also classified into positive vowels and negative vowels, and through the vowel replacement, diverse nuances such as big and small, strong and weak, heavy and light, wide and anarrow can be expressed. In the case of the Thai, different nuances according to the properties of consonants can be expressed, and in the case of vowels, nuance expressions such as big and small, heavy and light can be expressed through vowel replacement in the dialects of some regions.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 박미자, "한국어 교육을 위한 수준별 의성어·의태어 목록 연구", 석사, 한국학, pp.2009
  2. 박용수, "우리말 갈래사전" (1989), 한길사
  3. 신승은, "한국어 학습자를 위한 단계별 의성어·의태어 목록 선정과 교육 방안 연구 : 반복 형태를 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2011
  4. 張學蓮, "중국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 의성어·의태어 교육 연구", 박사, 외국어로서의한국어교육학과, pp.2012
  5. 채완, "국어 음성상징론의 몇 문제", 국어학, 16, pp.277~300 (1987)
  6. 최완평, "한?중 의성어의 형태적 음운적 특징", 한국언어문화, (31), pp.417~442 (2006), 한국언어문화학회
  7. Hinton, L., "Sound symbolism" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  8. THERAPHAN L-Thongkum, "Studies in Tai and Mon-Khmer phonetics and phonology in honour of Eugenie J.A. Henderson", pp.247~260 (1979), Chulalongkorn University Press
  9. "สรบุศย์ รุ่งโรจน์สุวรรณ. 2550. “โครงการคำเลียนเสียงธรรมชาติในภาษาไทย”, สำนักวิชาศิลปศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยแม่ฟ้าหลวง", ~
  10. "พจนานุกรมฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน (태국 왕립학술원 발행 태국어사전) พ .ศ.2524", ~
  11. "มติชน, บริษัท จำกัด (มหาชน). พจนานุกรมฉบบั มตชิ น(마띠촌 태국어사전). สำนักพิมพ์มติชน.2547", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)