유토피아 속의 안티유토피아: 1920년대 러시아 풍자희극의 딜레마 - V. 마야코프스키의 「빈대」와 「목욕탕」을 중심으로 -
The Anti-utopia in Utopia: The Dilemma of Russian 1920 Comedy Satire
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 1920s, Russian society was unstable and tremendous. After the 1917Revolution, Russian government had initiated "New Economic Policy" embeddedin a partial market system in these times. Also, Russian culture had been exposedto a new trend of culture, for instance, Russian Modernism. In the field of Russianliterature, satirical comedy became very popular. One of famous satirical comedy writers was V. Mayakovsky who was tryingto express his ideal society which consisted of both tensions and harmonies between the old and the new periods. In this context, V. Mayakovsky was recognizedas a poet with futurism who loved to write a comedy expressing social suburbanityand governmental bureaucracy. His two comedies, "Bug" and "Bath" were hisfamous comedies, dealing with Russian modernistic historics and theatricality in1920s. In this article, authors try to look into their artistic characteristics of 1920sRussian literature involving a new trend of social change, for instance, Grotesqueand Tragicomic features. In the same context, this article focused on its innerdilemma of satirical comedy which had been existed in 1920s Russian literature.
Abstract
In 1920s, Russian society was unstable and tremendous. After the 1917Revolution, Russian government had initiated "New Economic Policy" embeddedin a partial market system in these times. Also, Russian culture had been exposedto a new trend of culture, for instance, Russian Modernism. In the field of Russianliterature, satirical comedy became very popular. One of famous satirical comedy writers was V. Mayakovsky who was tryingto express his ideal society which consisted of both tensions and harmonies between the old and the new periods. In this context, V. Mayakovsky was recognizedas a poet with futurism who loved to write a comedy expressing social suburbanityand governmental bureaucracy. His two comedies, "Bug" and "Bath" were hisfamous comedies, dealing with Russian modernistic historics and theatricality in1920s. In this article, authors try to look into their artistic characteristics of 1920sRussian literature involving a new trend of social change, for instance, Grotesqueand Tragicomic features. In the same context, this article focused on its innerdilemma of satirical comedy which had been existed in 1920s Russian literature.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김규종, "1920-30년대 소련풍자에 대하여", 러시아어문학 연구논집, 4 (1988), 한국러시아문학회
- 김세영, "연극의 이해" (1996), 새문사
- 슬로님 마르크, "소련의 작가와 사회" (1986), 열린책들
- 슬로님 마르크, "소련현대문학사" (1989), 열린책들
- 마야코프스키, "마야꼬프스끼전집 3희곡 미스쩨리야 부프" (1993), 열린책들
- 미르스끼 D. S., "러시아문학사 I & II" (1988), 화다
- 박형규, "글라스노스찌와 오늘의 소련문학", 예술과 비평, 14 (1988)
- 쉬체르비나, "소련현대문학비평" (1986), 한겨레출판사
- 에르몰라에프 G., "소비에트 문학이론" (1988), 열린책들
- 이강은, "러시아문학사 개설" (1989), 한길사
- 이철, "러시아문학사" (1994), 벽호
- 이항재, "소련현대문학의 흐름과 성격", 전망, 46 (1990)
- 조주관, "러시아 희곡 1, 2" (1998), 열린책들
- 지이겔 H., "소비에트 문학이론(1917―1940)" (1988), 연구사
- Алперс Б., "Театральные премьеры и дискуссии" (1977), М.
- Богуславский А., "Русская советская драматургия 1917-1935" (1963), Академия наук, М.
- Гуревич А., "Категории средневековой литературы" (1972), М.
- Киселев Н., "Проблемы метода и жанра вып" (1974), Томский университет
- Манн Ю., "О гротеске в литературе" (1966), М.
- Маяковский В., "Полное собрание сочинений в 13 томах" (1958), М.
- Микулашек М., "Пути развития советской комедии 1925-1934 годов" (1962), Прага
- Михайлов Ал., "Точка пули в конце" (1993), М.
- "Академия наук СССР" (1954), М.
- Пави Патрис, "Словарь театра Прогресс" (1991), М.
- Парадокс о драме, "Наука" (1993), М.
- Петровский М., "Литературное обозрение" (1987), М.
- Ростоцкий Б., "Маяковский и театр" (1952), М.
- Февральский А., "Маяковский-драматург" (1940), М.-Л.