Beyond factual knowledge and symbolic competence: interculturality as transcultural intersubjectivity
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The trend of globalization has sharpened the debate on interculturality, which scholars examine from different and often conflicting points of view (‘content’ vs. ‘practice’, ‘culture-specific’ vs. ‘universal’, ‘communication (meta)theory’ vs. ‘communication practice’, ‘individual’ vs. ‘collective’, etc.). Whereas all these approaches are necessary to describe the multiple dimensions of interculturality, their dichotomous nature does not help to account for its internal complexity, which cannot be dissociated from the connections that exist among all these dimensions. The difficulty posed by the essentialist interpretations that tend to result from these dichotomies is compounded by the fact that in postmodern debates priority has been given to approaches that emphasize individual or collective agency over structural constraints which have to do with political economy or with cultural and linguistic codes and traditions. This paper aims mainly at suggesting that the dissolution of the boundaries that exist between these approaches should be pursued in order to get a fuller and richer approach to their common object of study. After discussing, by way of illustration, content-based and practice-based perspectives, we suggest that one way of getting beyond these dichotomies consists in focusing on the ‘interactional’ dimension of interculturality, which means laying emphasis on intersubjectivity and, particularly, on the individual subjects considered as members of different cultural communities who strive to transcend their sociocultural boundaries in order to reach harmonious interactions in a world in which inequality and the de-territorialization of people and cultures are central features.
Abstract
The trend of globalization has sharpened the debate on interculturality, which scholars examine from different and often conflicting points of view (‘content’ vs. ‘practice’, ‘culture-specific’ vs. ‘universal’, ‘communication (meta)theory’ vs. ‘communication practice’, ‘individual’ vs. ‘collective’, etc.). Whereas all these approaches are necessary to describe the multiple dimensions of interculturality, their dichotomous nature does not help to account for its internal complexity, which cannot be dissociated from the connections that exist among all these dimensions. The difficulty posed by the essentialist interpretations that tend to result from these dichotomies is compounded by the fact that in postmodern debates priority has been given to approaches that emphasize individual or collective agency over structural constraints which have to do with political economy or with cultural and linguistic codes and traditions. This paper aims mainly at suggesting that the dissolution of the boundaries that exist between these approaches should be pursued in order to get a fuller and richer approach to their common object of study. After discussing, by way of illustration, content-based and practice-based perspectives, we suggest that one way of getting beyond these dichotomies consists in focusing on the ‘interactional’ dimension of interculturality, which means laying emphasis on intersubjectivity and, particularly, on the individual subjects considered as members of different cultural communities who strive to transcend their sociocultural boundaries in order to reach harmonious interactions in a world in which inequality and the de-territorialization of people and cultures are central features.
참고문헌 (25)
- Ambadiang, Théophile, "Deconstructing the Intercultural Space through a Common Language: Identity and Linguistic Practice among Ecuadorian Immigrants in Spain", 석사
- Ambadiang, Théophile, "Agency and Alterity amidst Diversity: Some Challenges for Current Approaches to Language Learning and Teaching"
- Asante, Molefi Kete, "Communicating Africa: Enabling Centricity for Intercultural Engagement", China Media Research, 3(3), pp.70~75 (2007)
- "Setting the Context, Highlighting the Importance: Reflections on Interculturality and Pedagogy"[URL]
- Canagarajah, S., "Lingua Franca English, Multilingual Communities, and Language Acquisition", The Modern Language Journal, 91(5), pp.923~939 (2007)
- Chen, Guo-Ming, "Beyond the Dichotomy of Communication Studies", Asian Journal of Communication, 19(4), pp.398~411 (2009)
- Chen, G.-M., "Intercultural Communication. A Synthesis, in : The Global Intercultural Reader" (2008), Routledge
- Coelho, Nelson Ernesto Jr., "Patterns of Intersubjectivity in the Constitution of Subjectivity: Dimensions of Otherness", Culture & Psychology, 9(3), pp.193~208 (2003)
- Collins, James, "Social Reproduction in Classrooms and Schools", Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, pp.33~48 (2009)
- Coste, Daniel, "Médiation et altérité", Lidil, 39, pp.163~170 (2009)
- Dai, Xiaodong, "Intercultural Personhood and Identity Negotiation", China Media Research, 5(2), pp.1~12 (2009)
- Dai, Xiaodong, "Intersubjectivity and Interculturality: A Conceptual Link", China Media Research, 6(1), pp.12~19 (2010)
- Guilherme, Manuela, "Intercultural Competence, in : Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning", pp.297~300 (2000), Routledge
- Jaeger, Kirsten, "The Intercultural Speaker and present-day Requirements regarding Linguistic and Cultural Competence", Sprogforum, 19, pp.52~56 (2001)
- Kramsch, Claire, "The Privilege of the Intercultural Speaker, in : Foreign Language Learning in Intercultural Perspective", pp.16~31, Cambridge University Press
- Kramsch, C., "Identity, Role and Voice in Cross-Cultural (Mis)communication, in : Misunderstanding in Social Life", pp.129~153 (2003), Longman
- Kramsch, Claire, "Third Culture and Language Education, in : Contemporary Applied Linguistics", pp.233~254 (2009), Continuum
- Makoni, S., "Introducing Applied Linguistics in Africa", AILA Review, 16, pp.1~12 (2003)
- Marková, Ivana, "Constitution of the Self: Intersubjectivity and Dialogicality", Culture & Psychology, 9(3), pp.249~259 (2003)
- Matthey, Marinette, "Altérité et formation des enseignants", Lidil, 39, pp.5~17 (2009)
- McAdams, Dan P., "Personality Development: Continuity and Change over the Life Course", Annual Review of Psychology, 61, pp.517~542 (2010)
- Miike, Yoshitaka, "An Anatomy of Eurocentrism in Communication Scholarship: The Role of Asiacentricity in De-Westernizing Theory and Research", China Media Research, 6(1), pp.1~11 (2010)
- Miike, Yoshitaka, "Asian Contributions to Communication Theory: An introduction", China Media Research, 3(4), pp.1~6 (2007)
- Zarate, Geneviève, "Identities and Plurilingualism: Preconditions for the Recognition of Intercultural Competence, in : Intercultural Competence", pp.84~119 (2003), Council of Europe Publishing
- Zarate, Geneviève, "Précis du plurilinguisme et du pluriculturalisme" (2008), Éditions des Archives Contemporaines