러시아어 비음의 음운적 특성
Phonological Characteristics of Russian Nasal Consonants
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Russian nasal consonants / m /, / n / have a feature value not only [+consonant] in common with obstruents , but also [+sonorant] in common with vowels. Nasal / m /(bi-labial) and / n /(dental) have the same place of articulation but different manner of articulation. The feature value of / m / is [+cons, +son, +nas, +ant, -cor, -high, -low, -back, -cont, -del, rel, -strid, +voic], and that of / n / is [+cons, +son, +nas, +ant, +cor, -high, -low, -back, -cont, -del, rel, -strid, + voic]. There is a difference in feature [cor] value of / m / and / n /. In this study it is confirmed that it is a fact that the Russian nasal consonants behave differently from the other consonants in each phonological phenomenon due to their phonological characteristics. The preceding voiced obstruent is changed to an unvoiced one in a process where the last voiceless obstruent in the consonant cluster ' voiced obstruent + nasal /m/ + voiceless obstruent' skips the nasal consonant and spreads its feature value to the preceding voiced obstruent transparently because of the feature [+sonorant] of the nasal consonant. The coronal nasal /n/ participates in a palatalization with the following palatal actively and palatalize preceding plain consonants passively because of markedness hierarchy such as 'Velar > Labial > Coronal'. But the labial nasal /m/ is palatalized with the following velar palatal actively and participates in a palatalization with the following coronal palatal passively. This result helps us confirm the phonological difference of /m/ and /n/ in a palatalization. When the a final consonant is nasal, the unvoicing phenomenon of a final consonant doesn't occur. In such a case as cluster 'obstruent + nasal' the feature value [voiced] of the preceding obstruent doesn't change, but the following nasal can assimilate into the preceding obstruent. When continuing the same nasals / -nn- / in a consonant cluster, the feature value [+cont] of a weak position leads the preceding nasal / n / to be changed into [-cont] / l /. Through the analysis of the frequency of occurrences of consonants in syllabic onsets and codas that should observe the 'Sonority Sequence Principle', the sonority hierarchy of nasal consonants has been confirmed. In a diachronic perspective following nasal / m /, / n / there is a loss of the preceding labial stop and dental stop. But in clusters with the velar stop+nasal, the two-component cluster has been kept phonetically intact.
Abstract
Russian nasal consonants / m /, / n / have a feature value not only [+consonant] in common with obstruents , but also [+sonorant] in common with vowels. Nasal / m /(bi-labial) and / n /(dental) have the same place of articulation but different manner of articulation. The feature value of / m / is [+cons, +son, +nas, +ant, -cor, -high, -low, -back, -cont, -del, rel, -strid, +voic], and that of / n / is [+cons, +son, +nas, +ant, +cor, -high, -low, -back, -cont, -del, rel, -strid, + voic]. There is a difference in feature [cor] value of / m / and / n /. In this study it is confirmed that it is a fact that the Russian nasal consonants behave differently from the other consonants in each phonological phenomenon due to their phonological characteristics. The preceding voiced obstruent is changed to an unvoiced one in a process where the last voiceless obstruent in the consonant cluster ' voiced obstruent + nasal /m/ + voiceless obstruent' skips the nasal consonant and spreads its feature value to the preceding voiced obstruent transparently because of the feature [+sonorant] of the nasal consonant. The coronal nasal /n/ participates in a palatalization with the following palatal actively and palatalize preceding plain consonants passively because of markedness hierarchy such as 'Velar > Labial > Coronal'. But the labial nasal /m/ is palatalized with the following velar palatal actively and participates in a palatalization with the following coronal palatal passively. This result helps us confirm the phonological difference of /m/ and /n/ in a palatalization. When the a final consonant is nasal, the unvoicing phenomenon of a final consonant doesn't occur. In such a case as cluster 'obstruent + nasal' the feature value [voiced] of the preceding obstruent doesn't change, but the following nasal can assimilate into the preceding obstruent. When continuing the same nasals / -nn- / in a consonant cluster, the feature value [+cont] of a weak position leads the preceding nasal / n / to be changed into [-cont] / l /. Through the analysis of the frequency of occurrences of consonants in syllabic onsets and codas that should observe the 'Sonority Sequence Principle', the sonority hierarchy of nasal consonants has been confirmed. In a diachronic perspective following nasal / m /, / n / there is a loss of the preceding labial stop and dental stop. But in clusters with the velar stop+nasal, the two-component cluster has been kept phonetically intact.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강덕수, "최적성 이론에 의한 러시아어 음절 구조 연구", 음성. 음운. 형태론연구, 4 (1998)
- 강덕수, "러시아어 발음과 구조" (2009), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 강덕수, "러시아 언어학 연구의 방법과 문제" (1995), 한신문화사
- 김신효, "러시아어 음운론에서의 미명시", 박사, 노어, pp.2011
- 김신효, "인가 제약에 의한 러시아어", v, 노어노문학, pp.2012, 24(2)[DOI]
- 김신효, "러시아어 유음의 음운적 특성 연구", 노어노문학, 26(1), pp.3~34 (2014), 한국노어노문학회
- 유승남, "러시아어 음운론에 있어서 미명세 이론의 의미", 노어노문학, 11(2) (1999)
- ARCHANGELI, D., "Aspects of Underspecification Theory", Phonology, 5 (1988)
- BROWN, N, "Russian learners’ dictionary: 10,000 Russian words in frequency order" (1996), Routledge
- CHEW, P. A., "A Computational Phonology of Russian", 박사, pp.1999
- HALLE, M., "The Sound Pattern of Russian" (1959), Hague
- HAMILTON, W. S., "Introduction to Russian Phonology and Word Structure" (1980), Slavica
- ITO, J., "Licensing and Underspecification in Optimality Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 26(4) (1995)
- JAKOBSON, R., "Die Verteilung der Stimmhaften und Stimmlosen Geräuschlaute im Russischen", Festschrift für max vasmer (1956)
- JAKOBSON, R., "Mutual assimilation of Russian voiced and voiceless consonants", Studia Linguistica (1978)
- Markedness and Phonetic Grounding in Nasal-Stop Clusters, "KAPLAN, A.", Qualifying Paper, Department of Linguistics, UCSC, ~ (2008)
- KENSTOWICZ, M, "Phonology in Generative Grammar" (1994), Basil Blackwell
- KIPARSKY, P., "Lingustics in the Morning Calm" (1982), Hanshin
- KIPARSKY, P, "Some consequences of Lexical Phonology", Phonology Yearbook, 2 (1985)
- Padgett, J, "Stricture in Feature Geometry" (1995), CSLI
- "Ms. University of California at Santa Cruz. ROA", 2002
- PROCTOR, M. I., "Gestural Characterization of a Phonological Class: The Liquids", 박사, pp.2009
- SHAPIRO, M., "Russian Non-Distinctive Voicing: A Stocktaking", Russian Linguistics, 17 (1993)
- SHAROFF, S., "Frequency Dictionary of Russian: core vocabulary for learners (Routledge Frequency Dictionaries)" (2008), Routledge
- SHEVELOV, G, "Prehistory of Slavic; The Historical Phonology of Common Slavic" (1964), Universitätsverlag
- STERIADE, D., "Redundant values", Papers from the Twenty-third Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, 2 (1987)
- WHEELER, D., "Aspect of a Categorial Theory of Phonology", 박사, pp.1981
- YIP, M., "Phonetics and Phonology" (1991)
- ZUBRITSKAYA, K., "Mechanism of sound change in Optimality Theory", Language Variation and Change, 9(1) (1997)
- Аванесов, Р. И., "Фонетика современного русского литературного языка" (1956), МГУ
- Аванесов, Р. И., "Русское литературное произношение" (1984), Изд. просвещение
- Аванесов, Р. И, "Русское литературное произношение" (2005), Изд. КомКнига
- Авазбаев, Н, "Структура слога в языках разных типов" (1986), Фан
- Академия, Наук., "Русская грамматика, Том 1" (1982), Наука
- Зализняк, А. А., "Грамматический словарь русского языка, 3-е изд" (1977), Русский язык
- Зубкова, Л. Г., "Современный русскийязык - Теоретический курс. Фонетика" (1985), Изд. Русский язык
- Иванов, В. В., "Историческая грамматика русского языка" (1990), Просвещение