CHINUL’S HWAŎM THOUGHT IN THE HWAŎMNON CHŎRYO
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Pojo Chinul (1158–1210) is considered a great harmonizer of the conflicting Buddhist trends in the late Koryŏ period. Although diverse philosophical and soteriological aspects of his texts have been examined, the Hwaŏmnon chŏryo, a seminal text that demonstrates his effort to mitigate the tension between the Sŏn and Kyo schools, has not been given due scholarly attention. By revealing the drawbacks in previous scholarship on Chinul, this article emphasizes the importance of a correct understanding of Li Tongxuan’s (635–730) Xin huayan jing lun, the primary text that exerted an enormous influence on the formation of Chinul’s thought. Chinul’s text, however, sometimes omits the rich symbolism as represented in Li’s text. Moreover, the Hwaŏmnon chŏryo does not adopt indigenous philosophical frameworks for the explication of the Flower Garland Sūtra as introduced in its source text Xin huayan jing lun. Chinul, instead, faithfully accommodates Li’s fundamental philosophical and soteriological theses in this abridged text. Although Chinul does not accept every detail of Li’s exegesis and his text shows the characteristics of selective abridgement, he has a critical attitude toward the contemporary Buddhists just as Li does. This attitude may explain his adoption of this “unorthodox” text which was written by a layman and disregarded by both of the mainstream Sŏn and Kyo schools.
Abstract
Pojo Chinul (1158–1210) is considered a great harmonizer of the conflicting Buddhist trends in the late Koryŏ period. Although diverse philosophical and soteriological aspects of his texts have been examined, the Hwaŏmnon chŏryo, a seminal text that demonstrates his effort to mitigate the tension between the Sŏn and Kyo schools, has not been given due scholarly attention. By revealing the drawbacks in previous scholarship on Chinul, this article emphasizes the importance of a correct understanding of Li Tongxuan’s (635–730) Xin huayan jing lun, the primary text that exerted an enormous influence on the formation of Chinul’s thought. Chinul’s text, however, sometimes omits the rich symbolism as represented in Li’s text. Moreover, the Hwaŏmnon chŏryo does not adopt indigenous philosophical frameworks for the explication of the Flower Garland Sūtra as introduced in its source text Xin huayan jing lun. Chinul, instead, faithfully accommodates Li’s fundamental philosophical and soteriological theses in this abridged text. Although Chinul does not accept every detail of Li’s exegesis and his text shows the characteristics of selective abridgement, he has a critical attitude toward the contemporary Buddhists just as Li does. This attitude may explain his adoption of this “unorthodox” text which was written by a layman and disregarded by both of the mainstream Sŏn and Kyo schools.
참고문헌 (30)
- Buswell, Robert. E. Jr, "The Collected Works of Chinul: The Korean Approach to Zen" (1983), University of Hawai‘i Press
- Buswell, Robert. E. Jr, "Traditions of Meditation in Chinese Buddhism", pp.199~242 (1986), University of Hawai‘i Press
- Buswell, Robert. E. Jr, "Chinul: Selected Works. Collected Works of Korean Buddhism 2" (2012), Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism
- Ch’oe Sŏng-nyŏl, "A study of Chinul’s Hwaŏmnon chŏryo", Pŏmhan chŏrhak, 12, pp.253~288 (1996)
- Ch’oe Sŏng-nyŏl, "A study of the structure of “Doctrinal Essentials” in the Hwaŏmnon chŏryo", Han’guk Pulgyohak, 21, pp.61~86 (1996)
- Gimello, Robert. M, "Studies in Ch’an and Hua-yen", pp.321~389 (1983), Universtiy of Hawai‘i Press
- Gregory, Peter. N, "The Place of the Sudden Teaching within the Hua-yen Tradition: An Investigation of the Process of Doctrinal Change", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 6(1), pp.31~60 (1983)
- Ingy’ŏng, "Ten representative Korean philosophers: Chinul", pp.166~215 (2002), Yemun Sŏwŏn
- Ingy’ŏng, "Chinul’s accommodation and critique of Hwaŏm scholasticism: Focusing on the gate of dependent origination and that of nature origination", Pojo sasang, 20, pp.10~33 (2003)
- Kim Ch’ŏn-hak, "Chinul’s accommodation and modification of Li Tongxuan’s Huayan thought: Focusing on the Wŏndon sŏngbullon", Pojo sasang, 33, pp.151~188 (2010)
- Kim Kun-su. ca, "Epitaph for State Preceptor Puril Pojo of the Society for Cultivating Sŏn on Chogye Mountain", Tongmunsŏn, 117, pp.23~25
- Kimura Kiyotaka, "Li Tongxuan and State Preceptor Pojo Chinul: A perspective on the study of the Hwaŏmnon chŏryo", Pojo sasang, 2, pp.203~236 (1988)
- Kimura Kiyotaka, "The fundamental structure of East Asian Buddhist thought" (2001), Shunjusha
- Kin Chiken, "Hwaŏmnon chŏryo", pp.71~96 (1968), Seifū Gakuen
- Koh, Seunghak, "Li Tongxuan’s (635–730) Utilization of Chinese Symbolism in the Explication of the Avataṃsaka-sūtra", Asian Philosophy, 20(2), pp.141~158 (2010)[DOI]
- Koh, Seunghak, "On Li Tongxuan’s interpretations of the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra and the Vimalakīirti-nirdeśa", Pulgyohak yŏn’gu, 29, pp.225~254 (2011)
- Koh, Seunghak, "Li Tongxuan’s explication of the Avataṃsaka-sūtra in the Xin huayan jing lun: Focusing on its association with indigenous Chinese thought", Pulgyohak yŏn’gu, 34, pp.114~145 (2013)
- Kojima Taizan, "Chinese deveolpments of the Huayan thought of the Mt. Wutai lineage (II): Li Tongxuan’s influence on Juefan Huihong", Indogaku Bukkyōgaku kenkyū, 49(2), pp.745~749 (2001)
- Kŏn Ki-jong, "A study of Hyesim’s thought of kanhwa Sŏn", Pojo sasang, 7, pp.12~37 (1993)
- Kŏn Ki-jong, "Reilluminating Chinul’s thought: Meeting Chinul again", Pojo sasang, 31, pp.10~25 (2009)
- Lai, Whalen, "Sudden and Gradual: Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought", pp.169~200 (1987), University of Hawai‘i Press
- Pak Chae-hyŏn, "A study of Pojo Chinul’s Hwaŏmnon chŏryo: Focusing on faith and vows", Chŏrhak, 70, pp.5~24 (2002)
- Pak Kŏn-ju, "Chin’gak Hyesim’s forgery of Pojo’s Sŏn thought from the standpoint of kanhwa Sŏn", Chindan hakpo, 113, pp.33~59 (2011)
- Pak Kŏn-ju, "Kanhwa Sŏn discourses and their problems in the Pŏpchip pŏrhaengnok chŏryo pyŏngip sagi and the Kanhwa kyŏrŭiron", Chindan hakpo, 116, pp.1~28 (2012)
- Schultz, E. J, "Generals and Soldiers: Military Rule in Medieval Korea" (2000), University of Hawai‘i Press
- Shim, Jae-ryong, "The Philosophical Foundation of Korean Zen Buddhism: The Integration of Sŏn and Kyo by Chinul (1158–1210)", Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 50, pp.109~165 (1979)
- Shim, Jae-ryong, "An explication of the Wŏndon sŏngbullon written by the State Preceptor Pojo Chinul: Focusing on his thesis of identity between Sŏn and Kyo", Pojo sasang, 13, pp.117~149 (2000)
- Sŏk Kir-am, "An interpretation of Chinul’s notion of sudden enlightenment followed by gradual cultivation from the standpoint of the Huayan thought of nature origination", Pojo sasang, 30, pp.383~417 (2008)
- Songgokhŏn Pŏpchŏng, "A new discovery of the Hwaŏmnon chŏryo written by State Preceptor Pojo", Pulgyo, 36, pp.26~32 (1942)
- Yi Tŏk-chin, "A review of Chinul’s theory of nature origination: In relation with Chinese Huayan scholasticism", Pojo sasang, 13, pp.389~422 (2000)