본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

知訥 禪思想의 思想史的 검토

Re-evaluation of Jinul's Chuan Thought in the East Asian Chuan Tradition

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Through the abundant studies up to now, it has been known that Jinul's(知訥, 1158-1210) Chuan thought was consisted of 3 Gates(三門) ; the Gate of Parallel Keeping of Quiescence and Wakefulness(惺寂等持門), the Gate of Complete-sudden Faith and Understanding(圓頓信解門) and the Gate of Direct Cutting through the Kanhua Practice(看話徑截門). But some important problems about the 3 Gates has not been fully explained ; what was the philosophical or religious situation of the time that make Jinul propose the Gates and how each of the Gates related with the major philosophical problems of East Asian Buddhism up to the time. This paper intends to clarify the historical meaning of Jinul's Chuan thought in the history of East Asian Chuan tradition by explaining these problems. In his mid-twenties Jinul proposed the Gate of Parallel Keeping of Quiescence and Wakefulness to reform the Chuan trends of the time which neglect the ascetic practices and follow the laissez-faire attitude. This Gate based on the thought of the earliest Chuan writing Platform Sutra (『壇經』) also accepted Heze Shenhui's (荷澤神會, 668-706) thought which, though despised as illegitimate thought among the Chuan monks of the time, stressed the ascetic practices and the rehabilitation of the original mind. And in his late twenties Jinul proposed the Gate of Complete-sudden Faith and Understanding in order to concretely explain the essence of the original mind and the practices to achieve it. This Gate based on the thought of the Commentary on New Huayan Sutra (『新華嚴經論』) by Li Tung-xuan (李通玄, 635-730) also stressed the synthesization of Chuan and Huayan philosophy. Different from most of the Chuan monks indifferent to the Buddhist theoretical studies Jinul deliberated on the essential concepts of the Huayan and presented new understanding of them which enable the synthesization of Chuan and Huayan. The synthesization of the two traditions has been the biggest problem in East Asian Buddhism and Jinul's idea might be the most persuasive solution to it suggested up to the time. At the age of 40 Jinul proposed the last Gate of Direct Cutting through the Kanhua Practice to expel the void adhesion to the enlightenment and to deny the division between the subject and the object. This Gate, based on Dahui Zonggao's (大慧 宗杲, 1089-1163) Kanhua Chuan, not only stressed the limits of language and concepts but also suggested the practical methods to overcome them. By this Gate Jinul was able to prevent his disciples from substantiating the trueness and the practices to achieve it which might have arisen during the practice of the earlier two Gates. Like this, Jinul's 3 Gates were made by the amalgamation of the most important East Asian Buddhist thoughts - early Chuan, Huayan and Kanhua Chuan - on the traditional Chuan thought. Jinul's Chuan thought can be evaluated as a new reconstruction of the medieval East Asian Buddhism.

Abstract

Through the abundant studies up to now, it has been known that Jinul's(知訥, 1158-1210) Chuan thought was consisted of 3 Gates(三門) ; the Gate of Parallel Keeping of Quiescence and Wakefulness(惺寂等持門), the Gate of Complete-sudden Faith and Understanding(圓頓信解門) and the Gate of Direct Cutting through the Kanhua Practice(看話徑截門). But some important problems about the 3 Gates has not been fully explained ; what was the philosophical or religious situation of the time that make Jinul propose the Gates and how each of the Gates related with the major philosophical problems of East Asian Buddhism up to the time. This paper intends to clarify the historical meaning of Jinul's Chuan thought in the history of East Asian Chuan tradition by explaining these problems. In his mid-twenties Jinul proposed the Gate of Parallel Keeping of Quiescence and Wakefulness to reform the Chuan trends of the time which neglect the ascetic practices and follow the laissez-faire attitude. This Gate based on the thought of the earliest Chuan writing Platform Sutra (『壇經』) also accepted Heze Shenhui's (荷澤神會, 668-706) thought which, though despised as illegitimate thought among the Chuan monks of the time, stressed the ascetic practices and the rehabilitation of the original mind. And in his late twenties Jinul proposed the Gate of Complete-sudden Faith and Understanding in order to concretely explain the essence of the original mind and the practices to achieve it. This Gate based on the thought of the Commentary on New Huayan Sutra (『新華嚴經論』) by Li Tung-xuan (李通玄, 635-730) also stressed the synthesization of Chuan and Huayan philosophy. Different from most of the Chuan monks indifferent to the Buddhist theoretical studies Jinul deliberated on the essential concepts of the Huayan and presented new understanding of them which enable the synthesization of Chuan and Huayan. The synthesization of the two traditions has been the biggest problem in East Asian Buddhism and Jinul's idea might be the most persuasive solution to it suggested up to the time. At the age of 40 Jinul proposed the last Gate of Direct Cutting through the Kanhua Practice to expel the void adhesion to the enlightenment and to deny the division between the subject and the object. This Gate, based on Dahui Zonggao's (大慧 宗杲, 1089-1163) Kanhua Chuan, not only stressed the limits of language and concepts but also suggested the practical methods to overcome them. By this Gate Jinul was able to prevent his disciples from substantiating the trueness and the practices to achieve it which might have arisen during the practice of the earlier two Gates. Like this, Jinul's 3 Gates were made by the amalgamation of the most important East Asian Buddhist thoughts - early Chuan, Huayan and Kanhua Chuan - on the traditional Chuan thought. Jinul's Chuan thought can be evaluated as a new reconstruction of the medieval East Asian Buddhism.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 이덕진, "지눌 연구의 어제와 오늘, In 한국의 사상가 10人 지눌", pp.15~58 (2002), 예문동양사상연구원
  2. 普照思想硏究院, "普照全書" (1989)
  3. 최연식, "『法集別行錄節要幷入私記』를 통해 본 普照 三門의 성격", 普照思想, 12 (1999), 普照思想硏究院
  4. 이부키 아츠시, "새롭게 다시 쓰는 중국 禪의 역사", pp.104~ (2005), 대숲바람
  5. 崔柄憲, "新羅下代 禪宗九山派의 成立", 韓國史硏究, 7 (1972), 韓國史硏究會
  6. 高翊晉, "新羅下代의 禪傳來, In 韓國禪思想硏究" (1985)
  7. 최연식, "『眞心直說』의 著者에 대한 새로운 이해", 진단학보, (94), pp.77~102 (2002), 진단학회
  8. 崔柄憲, "天台宗의 成立", 韓國史, 6 (1975), 國史編纂委員會
  9. 許興植, "高麗前期 佛敎界와 天台宗의 形成過程", 韓國學報, 11 (1978), 一志社
  10. 金杜珍, "高麗 光宗代 法眼宗의 登場과 그 性格", 韓國史學, 4 (1983), 韓國史學會
  11. 許興植, "高麗中期 禪宗의 復興과 看話禪의 展開", 奎章閣, 6 (1982), 서울대奎章閣
  12. 崔柄憲, "高麗 中期 李資玄의 禪과 居士佛敎의 性格, In 金哲俊博士華甲記念史學論叢" (1983), 知識産業社
  13. 金相永, "高麗 睿宗代 禪宗의 復興과 佛敎界의 變化", 淸溪史學, 5 (1988), 淸溪史學會
  14. 鄭修芽, "慧照國師 曇眞과 ‘淨因髓’ - 北宋 禪風의 수용과 高麗中期 禪宗의 부흥을 중심으로 -, In 李基白先生古稀紀念韓國史學論叢(上)" (1994), 一潮閣
  15. 吉津宜英, "華嚴禪の思想史的硏究" (1985), 大東出版社
  16. 鎌田茂雄, "妄盡還源觀の思想史的意義", 南都佛敎, 20 (1967), 東大寺南都佛敎硏究會
  17. 石井公成, "華嚴宗の觀行文獻に見れる禪宗批判 -慧能の三科法門に留意して-, In 松が岡文庫硏究年報 17" (2003), 松が岡文庫
  18. 金知見, "華嚴과 禪의 世界, In 大華嚴一乘法界圖註幷序 - 金時習의 禪과 華嚴" (1983), 大韓傳統佛敎硏究院
  19. 全海住, "新羅 義湘의 華嚴敎學硏究", 박사, pp.1990
  20. 변희욱, "大慧 看話禪硏究", 박사, pp.2005
  21. 印鏡, "蒙山德異와 高麗後期 禪思想 硏究" (2000), 불일출판사
  22. 姜好鮮, "忠烈․忠宣王代 臨濟宗 수용과 高麗佛敎의 변화", 韓國史論, 46 (2001), 서울대국사학과
  23. 趙明濟, "高麗後期 看話禪 硏究" (2004), 혜안

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)