WŎNHYO’S APPROACH TO HARMONIZATION OF THE MAHAYANA DOCTRINES (HWAJAENG)
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Wŏnhyo (617–686) is known to the world as Korea’s leading Buddhist thinker and scriptural commentator, mainly due to his numerous exegeses and treatises that attempted to sort out the plethora of new Buddhist ideas generated in the fifth through seventh centuries in East Asia—ideas produced both through the continued influx of newly translated Indian texts, as well as the rapid appearance of fresh East Asian interpretations of the Buddhist doctrine. Wŏnhyo is especially noted for being the only scholar among the great East Asian commentators who had neither sectarian affiliation nor took a sectarian-based approach in the interpretation of Buddhist doctrines. Thus, the privileging of a specific sectarian approach was for Wŏnhyo impossible, since he saw each of the various doctrinal streams of Buddhism as representing a distinct but valid piece of the vast Mahāyāna system—as true as any other piece, but not to be seen as some kind of “ultimate” doctrine. Wonhyo’s method—known as hwajaeng 和諍 (“harmonization”)—is characterized by the juxtaposing of two or more divergent theoretical positions, comparing them, and clarifying their distinctive assumptions and aims. Once these assumptions are properly apprehended, what on the surface appear to be contradictory opinions are shown to be commensurate with each other from a deeper perspective. This article examines in detail the range of motivations, method-ologies, and approaches seen in Wonhyo’s hwajaeng project. Wonhyo’s approach will be examined in terms of three general aspects, which straddle the range of doctrinal/ scholastic, logical/philosophical, and religious, with the religious showing at least three levels of profundity.
Abstract
Wŏnhyo (617–686) is known to the world as Korea’s leading Buddhist thinker and scriptural commentator, mainly due to his numerous exegeses and treatises that attempted to sort out the plethora of new Buddhist ideas generated in the fifth through seventh centuries in East Asia—ideas produced both through the continued influx of newly translated Indian texts, as well as the rapid appearance of fresh East Asian interpretations of the Buddhist doctrine. Wŏnhyo is especially noted for being the only scholar among the great East Asian commentators who had neither sectarian affiliation nor took a sectarian-based approach in the interpretation of Buddhist doctrines. Thus, the privileging of a specific sectarian approach was for Wŏnhyo impossible, since he saw each of the various doctrinal streams of Buddhism as representing a distinct but valid piece of the vast Mahāyāna system—as true as any other piece, but not to be seen as some kind of “ultimate” doctrine. Wonhyo’s method—known as hwajaeng 和諍 (“harmonization”)—is characterized by the juxtaposing of two or more divergent theoretical positions, comparing them, and clarifying their distinctive assumptions and aims. Once these assumptions are properly apprehended, what on the surface appear to be contradictory opinions are shown to be commensurate with each other from a deeper perspective. This article examines in detail the range of motivations, method-ologies, and approaches seen in Wonhyo’s hwajaeng project. Wonhyo’s approach will be examined in terms of three general aspects, which straddle the range of doctrinal/ scholastic, logical/philosophical, and religious, with the religious showing at least three levels of profundity.
참고문헌 (49)
- Buswell, Robert E., Jr., "Cultivating Original Enlightenment: Wŏnhyo’s Exposition of the Vajrasamādhi-Sūtra (Kŭmgang Sammaegyŏng non)" (2007), University of Hawai‘i Press
- Ch’oe Yujin, "Study of Wŏnhyo’s Harmonization thought", Ph.D., pp.1988
- 福士慈稔, "元曉の思想を和諍思想と捉えることに対して", 佛教學, 64, pp.25~42 (2004)
- Gim Sanghyŏn, "Study of Wŏnhyo" (2000), Minjoksa
- 高翊晉, "Hanguk hwaŏm sasang yŏn’gu" (1997), Buddhist Cultural Research Institute, Dongguk University
- 石井公成, "元曉と中国思想", 印度學佛教學研究, 31(2), pp.164~167 (1983)
- 石井公成, "如来蔵と大乗起信論", pp.545~583 (1990), Shunjūsha
- 石井公成, "元曉の和諍思想の源流—『楞伽經』 との関連を中心として—", 印度學佛教學研究, 51(1), pp.19~23 (2002)
- 海住, "元曉の和諍原理—華厳一心につい て—", 印度學佛教學研究, 48(1), pp.225~229 (1999)
- 김용표, "Wnhyo's Essentials of the Mahprajnpramit-stra: Translation of Chapters 1-2 With Annotated Notes", International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture, 6, pp.53~75 (2006), 불교학술원
- Muller, A. Charles, "Faith and the Resolution of the Four Doubts in Wŏnhyo’s Doctrinal Essentials of the Sūtra of Immeasurable Life (Muryangsu gyeong jong-yo)", Bulletin of Tōyō Gakuen University, 15, pp.1~15 (2007)
- Muller, A. Charles, "Wŏnhyo on the Lotus Sūtra", 印度哲学仏教学研究, pp.25~38 (2009), Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies
- Muller, A. Charles, "Wŏnhyo’s Philosophy of Mind" (2012), University of Hawai‘i Press
- Muller, A. Charles, "The Collected Works of Korean Buddhism" (2012)
- Pak, Chonghong, "Assimilation of Buddhism in Korea: Religious Maturity and Innovation in the Silla Dynasty", pp.47~103 (1991), Asian Humanities Press
- Park, Sung Bae, "Wŏnhyo’s Commentaries on the Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna", Ph.D., pp.1979
- Park, Sung Bae, "Wŏnhyo’s thought system and various problems in the English translation of the complete works of Wŏnhyo" (1997), Dongguk University Press
- Park, Sung Bae, "Buddhist Spirituality II: Later China, Korea, Japan and the Modern World", pp.57~78 (1999), Crossroad Publishing Company
- Plassen, Jörg, "Korean Buddhism in East Asian Perspective", pp.213~241 (2007), Jimoondang
- 佐藤繁樹, "『金剛三昧經論』に於ける 論理構造の特色—無二而不守一思想", 印度學佛 教學研究, 42(2), pp.226~228 (1994)
- Satō Shigeki, "Wŏnhyo’s Logic of Doctrinal Reconciliation: “Non-dual without guarding the one” Thought" (1996), Minjoksa
- "Personal Notes on the Fundamentals of Bodhisattva Precepts in the Sutra of Brahmāʼs Net. 1 fasc.; HPC 1.581–585; T 1907.45.918–921", ~
- "大慧度經宗要 1 fasc. T 1697; HPC 1.480–487", ~
- "大乘起信論別記 2 fasc. HPC 1.677–697; T 1845.44.226a–240c", ~
- "Exposition of the Vajrasamādhi-sūtra. 3fasc.; HPC 1. 604–676; T 1730.34.961a–1008a", ~
- "Preface with the Commentary to the Flower Ornament Sūtra. Preface and fragment of fasc. 3, out of ten fascicles; HPC 1.495–97", ~
- "二障義 HPC 1.789c–814b", ~
- "Doctrinal Essentials of the Sutra of Immeasurable Life. 1 fasc.; HPC 1.553–562; T 1747.37.125b-131c", ~
- "Critique of Inference. HPC 1.814–817, XZJ 860", ~
- "Harmonization of Disputes in Ten Aspects. HPC 1.838–841", ~
- "Doctrinal Essentials of the Nirvana Sutra. 1 fasc.; HPC 1.524–546; T 1769.38.239a-255c", ~
- 玄奘, "辯中邊論 T 1600.31.464b1–477b22", ~
- 曇無讖, "大般涅槃大般涅槃經 40 fasc. T 374.12.365c–603c", ~
- Aśvaghoṣa, "大乘起信論 T 1666.32.575b–583b", ~
- 親光, "佛地經論 T 1530.26.291–328", ~
- Wŏnhyo, "起信論疏 T 1844.44.202a–226a", ~
- 玄奘, "解深密經 T 676.16.688b–711b", ~
- "金剛三昧經 T 273.9.365c–374b", ~
- 求那跋陀羅, "楞伽阿跋多羅寶經 T 670.16.479–513", ~
- 眞諦, "攝大乘論 T 1593.31.112b-132c", ~
- 賛寧, "宋高僧傳 T 2061.50.709a-900a", ~
- 玄奘, "瑜伽師地論 T 1579.30.279–882", ~
- Kuiji, "瑜伽師地論略纂 T 1829.43.1a1–228b5", ~
- Paramārtha, "中邊分別論 T 1599.31.451a1–464a23", ~
- "韓國佛教全書" (1979), Dongguk University Press
- Wŏnhyo, "十門和諍論 HPC 1.838–841", ~
- 高楠順次郎, "大正新脩大藏經" (1924), Daizō kyōkai
- "元曉聖師全書" (1989), Cheil munhwa sa
- "續藏經" (1905), Zokyō shoin