공법상 학생정보의 공개 및 보호에 관한 연구
A Study on the Disclosure and Protection of Student Information in Public Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As electronic and digital trends were emphasized in a world-wide scale, the notion of ‘E-government’ appeared and has been developed. Korea has made steady efforts for the reform to ‘E-government’, too. As the world gets more electronized and digitalized, many governments have tried reformation in governmental area to the ‘E-Government’ and Korea is taking leading position in that reform. But, generally speaking, ‘E-Government’ policies in Korea have inattentively dealt with basic human rights of Korean people such as right of privacy by having excessively clung to the economic ideal of ‘administrative efficiency.’ With the remarkable development of IT and the enlargement of its basic equipment, we are interested in Information increasingly. Recently, there has been in Korea a discussion on the establishment of a body on the protection of student information. From this critical point of view, this study starts with surveying the definition of ‘Student Information’ and ‘Education Information. The protection of student information is still governed by general laws related to the protection of personal information. Student information needs to be protected in a manner different from personal information through enacting a separate law, which would specify the disclosure and protection of student information and the rights of parents. It should be determined in view of the need of education rather than personal rights whether the National Education Information System (NEIS) must include educational information or not. I believe the problem of infringement on personal rights which might arise in the course of using educational information should be solved through authorization and security technology adopted by the NEIS as well as the enactment of a new law. These kind of NEIS' data is based on the basic rights of ‘self-data decision’ and ‘self-data control’ which are layed on our constitutional law. Hence the director and teachers in a school should obey the rule which they have to obtain students' parents' consent to collect personal data, to accumulate those data and profiles as the sharing database, and to use the personal information and to dissolve those data. So School masters have to permit to access to their children and to offer their children educational personal data. But we have to make face with any legal resource and are going to search for the standard of data protection guideline of OECD and EU following as: these rule are ‘limit of collection data’, ‘principle of data contents’, ‘principle of object distinct’, ‘principle of limit of use to personal data’, ‘principle of safe protection policy’, ‘principle of openness’, ‘principle to participate’ and ‘principle of responsibility.’ I think that this type of enactment in Korea gives us considerable suggestions in many respects
Abstract
As electronic and digital trends were emphasized in a world-wide scale, the notion of ‘E-government’ appeared and has been developed. Korea has made steady efforts for the reform to ‘E-government’, too. As the world gets more electronized and digitalized, many governments have tried reformation in governmental area to the ‘E-Government’ and Korea is taking leading position in that reform. But, generally speaking, ‘E-Government’ policies in Korea have inattentively dealt with basic human rights of Korean people such as right of privacy by having excessively clung to the economic ideal of ‘administrative efficiency.’ With the remarkable development of IT and the enlargement of its basic equipment, we are interested in Information increasingly. Recently, there has been in Korea a discussion on the establishment of a body on the protection of student information. From this critical point of view, this study starts with surveying the definition of ‘Student Information’ and ‘Education Information. The protection of student information is still governed by general laws related to the protection of personal information. Student information needs to be protected in a manner different from personal information through enacting a separate law, which would specify the disclosure and protection of student information and the rights of parents. It should be determined in view of the need of education rather than personal rights whether the National Education Information System (NEIS) must include educational information or not. I believe the problem of infringement on personal rights which might arise in the course of using educational information should be solved through authorization and security technology adopted by the NEIS as well as the enactment of a new law. These kind of NEIS' data is based on the basic rights of ‘self-data decision’ and ‘self-data control’ which are layed on our constitutional law. Hence the director and teachers in a school should obey the rule which they have to obtain students' parents' consent to collect personal data, to accumulate those data and profiles as the sharing database, and to use the personal information and to dissolve those data. So School masters have to permit to access to their children and to offer their children educational personal data. But we have to make face with any legal resource and are going to search for the standard of data protection guideline of OECD and EU following as: these rule are ‘limit of collection data’, ‘principle of data contents’, ‘principle of object distinct’, ‘principle of limit of use to personal data’, ‘principle of safe protection policy’, ‘principle of openness’, ‘principle to participate’ and ‘principle of responsibility.’ I think that this type of enactment in Korea gives us considerable suggestions in many respects
참고문헌 (46)
- 경? 건, "공공정보의 공개ㆍ제공법제의 개선방안-접근성확대를 위한 공공정보의 관리-", 인터넷법률, (16) (2003), 법무부
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2008), 법문사
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" (2008), 박영사
- 김민호, "공공정보의 보존에 관한 법체계 개선방안 연구", 인터넷법률, (16) (2003), 법무부
- 김배원, "「‘정보’관련 기본권」의 독자적ㆍ통합적 보장을 위한 시론", 헌법학연구, 7(2) (2001), 한국헌법학회
- 김성태, "국가정보화ㆍ전자정부정책 추진체계 입법방안 연구", 인터넷법률, 17 (2003), 법무부
- 김용섭, "정보공개와 개인정보보호의 충돌과 조화", 공법연구, (3) (2001), 한국공법학회
- 김일환, "교육행정정보시스템(NEIS)의 법적 정비에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, 17(3) (2005), 성균관대학교 비교법연구소
- 김재광, "행정정보의 디지털화에 따른 관련법제 정비방안" (2001), 한국법제연구원
- 김재광, "공공정보의 공동이용활성화를 위한 관련법제 정비방안", 인터넷법률, (16) (2003), 법무부
- 김주환, "디지털시대의 개인정보보호와 사민권", 인터넷법률, (4) (2001), 법무부
- 김철수, "헌법학신론" (2008), 박영사
- 박균성, "행정법론(상)" (2008), 박영사
- 송강직, "“NEIS 저지를 위한 연차유급휴가의 쟁의행위 해당성”, 『노동판례 비평 : 대법원 노동사건 판례 경향 분석 및 주요 판례 평석』Vol. 2004(2005.8)" (2005), 민주사회를 위한 변호사 모임
- 안주열, "어린이의 학습권에 관한 법적 고찰", 교육법학연구, 15(2) (2003), 대한교육법학회
- 이수광, "교육정보화에 따른 학생의 사생활권 신장방안", 개인정보연구, 1(1) (2003), 한국정보보호진흥원
- 이윤식, "행정정보체제론" (2003), 법영사
- 이은우, "자기정보통제권의 개념과 의의", "정보인권과 자기정보통제권", 토론회 자료집 (2003)
- 이인호, "학생의 정보프라이버시와 교육행정정보시스템(NEIS):NEIS에 대한 헌법적 평가를 중심으로", 인권과 정의, (329) (2004), 대한변호사협회
- 이종영, "독일의 전자정부 법제", 인터넷법률, (16) (2003), 법무부
- 이창범, "유럽연합의 정보보안 및 개인정보보호 법제 현황", 인터넷법률, (38) (2007), 법무부
- 임규철, "NEIS와 개인정보자기결정권:국가인권위원회의 NEIS결정을 중심으로", 인권과 정의, (323) (2003), 대한변호사협회
- 임지봉, "미국 연방 전자정부법제와 그것이 우리에게 주는 시사점", 인터넷법률, (17) (2003), 법무부
- 정순원, "청소년의 인격성장권과 사이버공간에서의 청소년 보호", 박사, pp.2006
- 정영화, "교육행정정보시스템(NEIS시스템)에 대한 위헌성의 평가", 인터넷법률, (19) (2003), 법무부
- 정철현, "신 행정정보체계론" (2006), 서울경제경영
- 정태호, "개인정보자기결정권의 헌법적 근거 및 구조에 대한 고찰:동시에 교육행정정보시스템(NEIS)의 위헌여부의 판단에의 그 응용", 헌법논총, 14 (2003), 헌법재판소
- 조태제, "공공정보의 작성 및 취득단계에서의 제도개선방안", 인터넷법률, (16) (2003), 법무부
- 허? 영, "한국헌법론" (2008), 박영사
- 인터넷상의 정보보호에 관한 법제연구, 연구보고서, "현대호", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2000)
- 현대호, "학생정보의 보호에 관한 법제연구-(가칭)학생정보보호위원회의 설치를 중심으로-" (2006), 한국법제연구원
- 홍성걸, "개인정보보호와 정책갈등-NEIS 사례를 중심으로-", Information Security Review, 1(2) (2004), 한국정보보호진흥원
- 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" (2008), 박영사
- "울 엄마, '전교조'보다 세다" (2008), 조선일보[URL]
- "교총, '학부모 학교출입 제한' 입법추진" (2008), 조선일보[URL]
- Carsten, Rummel, "Kindeswohl - Ein Gebot von Verfassungsrang in neuen 젨쟵nd alten Spannungsfeldern: Leihmutterschaft, Embryonenschutz und Jugendhilfe" (1989), Die schwierige Abl?ung vom
- Gegenstand, "Innovationsforschung als Gegenstand der Technikgenese-? forschung, in：Rechtswissenschaftliche" (1998), Innovationsforschung
- Ditzen, Christa, "Das Menschwerdungsgrundrecht des Kindes-zugleich Anmerkung zu BVerGE" (1989), NJW
- Eifert, Martin, "Electronic Government als gesamtstaatliche Organisations- aufgabe" (2001), ZG
- Engels, Stefan, "Kinder und Jugendschutz in der Verfassung" (1997), Verankerung, Funktion und Verh?tnis
- Frenzel, Rainer, "Der Verfassungsrechtliche Anspruch Minderj?riger und Heranwachsender auf freie Entfaltung der Pers?lichkeit. Rechts- und sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Jugendhilfe(Diss.)" (1988), Wuppertal
- Holznagel, "Electronic Government auf kommunaler Ebene - Die Zul?sigkeit von Transaktionsdiensten im Internet" (1999), DVBl
- Jarass, Hans D., "Grundgesetz f? die Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Kommentar(7. Aufl.)" (2004)
- Ordemann, Hans-Joachim, "Pa?echt, Ausweisrecht und Melderecht des Bundes: Pa?esetz, Personalausweisgesetz" (2004), Textausgabe mit Erl?terungen
- Starck, Christian, "Das Bonner Grundgesetz: Kommentar(4. Aufl.), Mangoldt(Hrsg)" (1999)
- Tim, Faber, "Jugendschutz im Internet - Klassische und neue staatliche Regulierungsans?ze zum Jugendmedienschutz im Internet(Diss.)" (2004)