행정정보 공동이용 법제의 개인정보보호 정합성 연구
A Study on the Consistency of Personal Data Protectionto Legislation of Administrative Information Co-Using
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public administration environment due to information technology. Moreover an independent nation tend to nowadays expand the range of regulating and adjusting social life to realize the constitutional ideology of welfare state. From the viewpoint of such legislative conditions, there should be satisfied with systemic foundation, democratic procedure, and customer-centered policy in public administration. And also personal data protection as well as security management will be the core limitations crucial to E-government. As everyone knows, personal data protection, that is to say guarantee of information privacy, is bound to contradict the utilization of administrative information including personal data of data subject. Resultingly should the illegality be relatively reviewed the utilization of administrative information to serve the common good without infringement of information privacy. In EGA(Electronic Government Act), legislative system of administrative information co-using must be the interface between beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. In other words, it is necessary to collect personal data enough almost to meet the demand of utilization administrative information for E-government for public interests. So then EGA is enacted by the provisions allowing for beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. The probability is that the legal value of administrative information co-using will conflict with that of information privacy of data subject and intensify the ideological conflict most of all. Consequently speaking, it is essential for regulations on the co-used bounds of administrative information to be prescribed substantially to abide by ‘statute reservation principle’ or ‘rule of law’ in EGA. Besides will the supplementation for consent acquisition procedure and administrative control system be the matters calling for prior settlement and amendment cornerstone to stabilize the laws and regulations related to EGA by organic mediation of information-related legislations tuned to Personal Data Protection Act.
Abstract
Public administration could by all means be defined as superintendence of governmental function under the official prestige of administrative agency and it is suggested that the legal order must have normal standards effective to the change in public administration environment due to information technology. Moreover an independent nation tend to nowadays expand the range of regulating and adjusting social life to realize the constitutional ideology of welfare state. From the viewpoint of such legislative conditions, there should be satisfied with systemic foundation, democratic procedure, and customer-centered policy in public administration. And also personal data protection as well as security management will be the core limitations crucial to E-government. As everyone knows, personal data protection, that is to say guarantee of information privacy, is bound to contradict the utilization of administrative information including personal data of data subject. Resultingly should the illegality be relatively reviewed the utilization of administrative information to serve the common good without infringement of information privacy. In EGA(Electronic Government Act), legislative system of administrative information co-using must be the interface between beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. In other words, it is necessary to collect personal data enough almost to meet the demand of utilization administrative information for E-government for public interests. So then EGA is enacted by the provisions allowing for beforehand prevention and post-factum remedies of infringement of information privacy. The probability is that the legal value of administrative information co-using will conflict with that of information privacy of data subject and intensify the ideological conflict most of all. Consequently speaking, it is essential for regulations on the co-used bounds of administrative information to be prescribed substantially to abide by ‘statute reservation principle’ or ‘rule of law’ in EGA. Besides will the supplementation for consent acquisition procedure and administrative control system be the matters calling for prior settlement and amendment cornerstone to stabilize the laws and regulations related to EGA by organic mediation of information-related legislations tuned to Personal Data Protection Act.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김민호, "행정정보 공동이용의 범위와 한계에 대한 이론적 고찰 및 정책과제", 토지공법연구, 43(1), pp.563~592 (2009), 한국토지공법학회
- 김민호, "법률유보의 한계와 위임입법", 공법연구, 28(4) (2000), 한국공법학회
- 김일환, "전자정부구축에 따른 행정정보 공동이용의 방식과 유형에 관한 고찰", 성균관법학, 19(1), pp.1~30 (2007), 법학연구소
- 김일환, "個人情報 共同利用의 統制와 監督에 관한 比較法的 考察 ― 미국과 독일의 법제를 중심으로 ―", 헌법학연구, 13(2), pp.407~440 (2007), 한국헌법학회
- 성낙인, "정보보호와 인권", 법학, 45(1) (2004), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 행정정보의 공동활용제도에 관한 연구, "서진완", 한국행정연구원, ~ (1997)
- 개인정보보호의 법적 쟁점과 과제, "이민영", 한국정보화진흥원, ~ (2009)
- 이민영, "개인정보에 관한 행정통제와 권익구제의 법적 연구 - 공공기관의 CCTV 운영에 대한 행정쟁송의 적용을 중심으로 -", 선진상사법률연구, (43), pp.41~61 (2008), 법무부
- 이민영, "개인정보법제론" (2007), 진한M&B
- 이민영, "행정정보 공동이용의 추진 방향과 법적 과제", 정보통신정책, 통권 : 398 (2006), 정보통신정책연구원
- 인터넷 개인정보보호에 관한 법제도 연구, "이민영", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.정책연구 00-10 (2000)
- Caroline J. Tolbert, "Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States", Public Administration Review, 68(3) (2008), American Society for Public Administration
- Christopher John Fox, "Information and Misinformation: an investigation of information, misinformation, informing, and misinforming, Westport" (1983), Greenwood Press
- David H. Rosenbloom, "Public Administration and Law" (1997), Marcel Dekker Inc.
- Konrad Redeker, "Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung" (1994), Kohlhammer
- Lisa Schultz Bressman, "Beyond Accountability: Arbitrariness and Legitimacy in the Administrative State", N.Y.U.L. Rev., 78, pp.461~ (2003)
- Information Society and Informationization in the Electronic Age, The IT Revolution; Challenges from Innovation in Information and Communication Technology and the Role of Government, "Masahiro Okuno-Fujiwara", Institute for International Policy Studies, ~ (2001)
- Rainer Pitschas, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht als Teil der öffentlichen Informationsordnung. in: Reform des allgemeinen Verwaltungsrechts" (1993), Nomos
- Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, "Verwaltungskontrolle; Perspektiven. in: Verwaltungs- Kontrolle" (2001), Nomos Verlag
- Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, "Verwaltungsrecht in der Informationsgesellschaft: Einleitende Problemskizze. in: Verwaltungsrechts in der Informationsgesellschft" (2000), Nomos
