사이버 포렌식, 디지털 증거, 사이버 공간, 압수ㆍ수색, 사이버 범죄
Establishing Legal System of Cyber Forensics
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We have a criminal investigative procedural code that is made and maintained for evidences based on physical attributes. However, we have recognized that evidences in cyber space have different attributes and characteristics than those in physical search and seize procedures. Fortunately, digital evidence accepted as evidence in the amended law that was effective January 1, 2012. However, our society is becoming more ubiquitous again. Therefore, it is not enough to add digital evidence as evidence but also to change the procedural code of search and seizure for digital evidence. A new set of search and seizure procedures should be developed that provides for efficiency investigation while ensuring that privacy rights are protected for the subjects and 3rd parties involved. In this study, we reviewed types of evidence collection in cyberspace and classified them by objective point of view and pitted them against the current law. The research suggested a new proper form of the method of seizure and search for evidences in the cyber environment. Furthermore, it was paramount consider the dual perspective to guarantee human rights. Also, there needs to be a data preservation system, command procedure for seizure, seizure and search system over networks, and collection system of communications for effective investigation. Finally, a regulation is required to ensure cooperation of information and service providers with law enforcement agencies. In establishing a legal system for cyber forensics, there should be a system for cyber criminal investigative procedural code in this ubiquitous era.
Abstract
We have a criminal investigative procedural code that is made and maintained for evidences based on physical attributes. However, we have recognized that evidences in cyber space have different attributes and characteristics than those in physical search and seize procedures. Fortunately, digital evidence accepted as evidence in the amended law that was effective January 1, 2012. However, our society is becoming more ubiquitous again. Therefore, it is not enough to add digital evidence as evidence but also to change the procedural code of search and seizure for digital evidence. A new set of search and seizure procedures should be developed that provides for efficiency investigation while ensuring that privacy rights are protected for the subjects and 3rd parties involved. In this study, we reviewed types of evidence collection in cyberspace and classified them by objective point of view and pitted them against the current law. The research suggested a new proper form of the method of seizure and search for evidences in the cyber environment. Furthermore, it was paramount consider the dual perspective to guarantee human rights. Also, there needs to be a data preservation system, command procedure for seizure, seizure and search system over networks, and collection system of communications for effective investigation. Finally, a regulation is required to ensure cooperation of information and service providers with law enforcement agencies. In establishing a legal system for cyber forensics, there should be a system for cyber criminal investigative procedural code in this ubiquitous era.
참고문헌 (28)
- 강동욱, "디지털증거 수집에 관한 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 검토", 법학연구, 18(3), pp.161~188 (2010), 법학연구소
- 권오걸, "디지털증거의 개념ㆍ특성 및 증거능력의 요건", IT와 법연구, (5), pp.291~318 (2011), IT와 법연구소
- 권양섭, "사이버 공간에서의 증거수집에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, (37), pp.197~216 (2010), 한국법학회
- 권양섭, "디지털 증거의 압수ㆍ수색에 관한 입법론적 연구", 원광법학, 26(1), pp.345~372 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김성룡, "압수,수색관련 최근 개정 제안과 독일 형사소송법, 실무의 비교 검토", 형사법의 신동향, (31), pp.1~43 (2011), 대검찰청
- 김영란, "사이버 범죄조약 대응을 위한 일본의 형사법개정안 연구", 치안정책연구, (19) (2005), 치안정책연구소
- 전자적 증거의 실효적 압수ㆍ수색에 관한 문제, "노명선", 대검찰청, ~ (2007)
- 노정환, "현행 압수수색제도에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 실무상 문제점을 중심으로 -", 법조, 59(4), pp.5~57 (2010), 법조협회
- 박경신, "E-메일 압수수색의 제문제와 관련 법률개정안들에 대한 평가", 법학연구, 13(2), pp.265~314 (2010), 법학연구소
- 박종근, "디지털 증거 압수ㆍ수색과 법제", 형사법의 신동향, 통권 : 18 (2009), 대검찰청
- 사법제도개혁특별위원회, "바람직한 디지털 증거의 수집방안", 디지털증거수집의문제점과 개선방안에 관한 공청회 자료집 (2010)
- 손동권, "새로이 입법화된 디지털 증거의 압수·수색제도에 관한 연구 - 특히 추가적 보완입법의 문제 -", 형사정책, 23(2), pp.325~349 (2011), 한국형사정책학회
- 양근원, "형사절차상 디지털 증거의 수집과 증거능력에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 吳奇斗, "證據의 關聯性과 컴퓨터 關聯證據", 저스티스, 73, pp.136~163 (2003), 한국법학원
- 원혜욱, "과학적 수사방법에 의한 증거수집- 전자증거의 압수·수색을 중심으로 -", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.7~190 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 이은모, "전자적 정보에 관한 수사상의 문제점", 형사법연구, (23), pp.156~175 (2005), 한국형사법학회
- 이주원, "디지털 증거에 대한 압수수색제도의 개선", 안암법학, (37), pp.151~199 (2012), 안암법학회
- 이윤제, "디지털 증거의 압수·수색과 증거능력", 형사법 신동향, (23) (2009), 대검찰청
- 조석영, "디지털 정보의 수사방법과 규제원칙", 형사정책, 22(1), pp.75~98 (2010), 한국형사정책학회
- 정교일, "디지털 증거의 압수와 공판정에서의 제출방안", 형사법의 신동향, (25), pp.104~205 (2010), 대검찰청
- 최성진, "수사기관의 전자우편 압수수색의 한계에 관한 연구 - 미국의 판례 및 법제도를 중심으로 -", 홍익법학, 11(2), pp.127~156 (2010), 법학연구소
- 탁희성, "전자증거에 관한 연구 : 압수·수색과 증거능력을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2004
- 탁희성, "컴퓨터통신망 검색의 적법성 및 그 한계", 형사정책연구, 15(4), pp.137~164 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 탁희성, "전자증거의 압수·수색에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, 15(1), pp.21~62 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- CCIPS(Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, U.S. D.O.J.), "Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations", ~ (2002)
- CCIPS(Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, U.S. D.O.J.), "Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations", ~ (2002)
- Eoghan Casey, "Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet, Second Edition" (2004), Academic Press
- 日本法務省, "法制審議会刑事法(ハイテク犯罪関係) 部会第1回会議", 第7回会議 議事錄 (2003)