디지털 증거에 대한 압수수색제도의 개선
Study on the Improvement of Seizure and Search of Digital Evidence
0
조회
0
다운로드
59
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Owing to the development of computer and network, modern society is facing the digital environment in every sectors of life, and data produced by individuals, enterprises, or government are basically grounded upon computer processes, while data already produced are converted into digital data. In the society where internet is commonly used, through the Information Superhighway Network, digital evidence achieves important meaning that is not to be overlooked. Since seizure and search is legal disposition that limits civil rights, the principle that legal disposition should be ruled by law, the rule of warrant, and the principle of proportionality should be applied to them. Yet, warrants are more easily issued for seizure and search compared to arrest and detention. Excessive seizure and search of investigation agents on documents or computers of enterprises have been criticized and the necessity of regulating seizure and search on private digital data, such as emails, are being raised. In seizure and search on digital evidence, the purpose of effective collection of evidence, and the value of protecting trade secrets of enterprises and privacy may conflict. Concerning seizure and search of digital evidence, drafts of Criminal Procedure Act amendment have been discussed since 2009, and was promulgated in 18th July, 2011 (Act 10864), coming into force from 1st January, 2012. It is now the time to settle reasonable seizure and search system on digital evidence which can balance the two contrasting values.
Abstract
Owing to the development of computer and network, modern society is facing the digital environment in every sectors of life, and data produced by individuals, enterprises, or government are basically grounded upon computer processes, while data already produced are converted into digital data. In the society where internet is commonly used, through the Information Superhighway Network, digital evidence achieves important meaning that is not to be overlooked. Since seizure and search is legal disposition that limits civil rights, the principle that legal disposition should be ruled by law, the rule of warrant, and the principle of proportionality should be applied to them. Yet, warrants are more easily issued for seizure and search compared to arrest and detention. Excessive seizure and search of investigation agents on documents or computers of enterprises have been criticized and the necessity of regulating seizure and search on private digital data, such as emails, are being raised. In seizure and search on digital evidence, the purpose of effective collection of evidence, and the value of protecting trade secrets of enterprises and privacy may conflict. Concerning seizure and search of digital evidence, drafts of Criminal Procedure Act amendment have been discussed since 2009, and was promulgated in 18th July, 2011 (Act 10864), coming into force from 1st January, 2012. It is now the time to settle reasonable seizure and search system on digital evidence which can balance the two contrasting values.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김경수, "압수수색 대상의 특정성에 관한 비판적 검토", 성균관법학, 22(3), pp.1~20 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김성룡, "압수수색(영장)의 요건에 관한 검토", 2011년 한국형사소송법학회 춘계학술대회 자료집 (2011)
- 노정환, "현행 압수수색제도에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 실무상 문제점을 중심으로 -", 법조, 59(4), pp.5~57 (2010), 법조협회
- 박종근, "디지털증거 압수수색과 법제", 형사법의신동향, (18) (2009), ,
- 배종대, "신형사소송법 제3판" (2011), 홍문사
- 백강진, "디지털증거 수집의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 공청회 자료집" (2010), 국회 사법개혁특별위원회
- 법원행정처, "외국사법제도연구3 : 각국의 형사사건 기소절차", ~ (2008)
- 양근원, "형사절차상 디지털 증거의 수집과 증거능력에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 吳奇斗, "刑事節次上 컴퓨터 關聯證據의 수집 및 利用에 關한 硏究", 박사, pp.1997
- 이숙연, "형사소송에서의 디지털증거의 취급과 증거능력", 박사, pp.2011
- 이훈동, "컴퓨터관련범죄와 형사절차, In 형사법학의 과제와 전망(성시탁교수회갑기념논문집)" (1993)
- 외국판례에 나타난 디지털증거 수집․분석․보존 과정에서의 무결성 논란에 비추어 본 디지털 증거의 활용방안, "임종인", 대검찰청, ~ (2006)
- 전승수, "형사절차상 디지털 증거의 압수수색 및 증거능력에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2011
- 조국, "압수·수색의 합법성 기준 재검토", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.29~782 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 조상수, "디지털 증거의 법적 효력 제고를 위한 무결성 보장 절차 연구", 석사, pp.2010
- 탁희성, "전자증거의 압수·수색에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, 15(1), pp.21~62 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 조석영, "디지털 정보의 수사방법과 규제원칙", 형사정책, 22(1), pp.75~98 (2010), 한국형사정책학회
- 정보사회에서의 범죄에 대한 수사와 재판, In 정보사회에 대비한 일반법연구(II), "하태훈", 정보통신정책연구원, ~ (1998)
- "Digital evidence in the Courtroom: A Guide for Law enforcement and Prosecutors", National Institute of Justice, ~ (2007)
- Lehman, "Uwe, Handbuch zum Strafverfahren, In Uwe, Handbuch zum Strafverfahren" (2008), München
- Martin Kemper, "데이터와 이메일의 압수적격성(Die Beschlag- nahmefähigkeit von Daten und E-mails", 인터넷법률, (33) (2006)
- Rolando V. Del. Carmen, "Criminal Procedure" (2010), Wardsworth
- "Searching and Seizing Computer and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations", Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 2002, ~ (2006)
- Volk, "Grundkurs StPO, 6.Aufl." (2008), München
- 松本時夫, "條解刑事訴訟法(第3版增補版)" (2006), 弘文堂