보험소비자보호에 관한 연구 –2012년 입법예고된 상법 보험편 개정안 통칙편을 중심으로-
A Study on Insurance Consumer Protection – Mainly on common provisions of 2012 pre-announcement of legislation -
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Insurance is a social economic system, which relieves economical anxiety due to uncertain physical or material damages. So, insurance law revision needs prudent review on protection of insurance consumer. The purpose of Insurance law revision is in modernization and modernized insurance must correspond to modern society and global standard. Among the revision, protection of insured consumer is the most important task. You can easily find such precedents in advanced legislation cases. According to Section 6, Clause 1 of German insurance contract act,which has been revised in July 5th 2007, and activated since beginning of 2008, 'If the difficulty in assessing the insurance being offered or the policyholder himself and his situation gives occasion thereto, the insurer must ask him about his wishes and needs and, also bearing in mind an appropriate relation between the time and effort spent in providing this advice and the insurance premiums to be paid by the policyholder, the insurer shall advise the policyholder and state reasons for each of the pieces of advice in respect of a particular insurance. He shall document this,taking into account the complexity of the contract of insurance being offered.' This statement regulates responsibility of insurer to consult and provides regulatory protection to policyholder. If this has not been fulfilled or documented, such act can be a legal basis of compensation. A strong will of legislator to protect insurance consumer can be seen through above legislation. South Korean government also have made pre-announcement of legislation on amendments of insurance law, according to social environment change and new insurance superintendence change, in June, 15th, 2012through public announcement '2012-156' of Department of Justice. Such amendment has been prepared under principle of rational and fair balance between insurance company and insurance consumer, balance among civil act, insurance inspection regulation and foreign countries' legislation cases,protection of policyholder, and procurement of good intention of insurance system. However, despite of commercial law commission's effort on insurance law amendments, there can be seen some insufficient items on aspects of insurance consumer. So following thesis will cover insurance consumer protection mainly on insurer’s duty to deliver and explain the insurance clauses, insurance agency's authority, duty of disclosure related regulations,and regulation on period of extinction session on insurance claim.
Abstract
Insurance is a social economic system, which relieves economical anxiety due to uncertain physical or material damages. So, insurance law revision needs prudent review on protection of insurance consumer. The purpose of Insurance law revision is in modernization and modernized insurance must correspond to modern society and global standard. Among the revision, protection of insured consumer is the most important task. You can easily find such precedents in advanced legislation cases. According to Section 6, Clause 1 of German insurance contract act,which has been revised in July 5th 2007, and activated since beginning of 2008, 'If the difficulty in assessing the insurance being offered or the policyholder himself and his situation gives occasion thereto, the insurer must ask him about his wishes and needs and, also bearing in mind an appropriate relation between the time and effort spent in providing this advice and the insurance premiums to be paid by the policyholder, the insurer shall advise the policyholder and state reasons for each of the pieces of advice in respect of a particular insurance. He shall document this,taking into account the complexity of the contract of insurance being offered.' This statement regulates responsibility of insurer to consult and provides regulatory protection to policyholder. If this has not been fulfilled or documented, such act can be a legal basis of compensation. A strong will of legislator to protect insurance consumer can be seen through above legislation. South Korean government also have made pre-announcement of legislation on amendments of insurance law, according to social environment change and new insurance superintendence change, in June, 15th, 2012through public announcement '2012-156' of Department of Justice. Such amendment has been prepared under principle of rational and fair balance between insurance company and insurance consumer, balance among civil act, insurance inspection regulation and foreign countries' legislation cases,protection of policyholder, and procurement of good intention of insurance system. However, despite of commercial law commission's effort on insurance law amendments, there can be seen some insufficient items on aspects of insurance consumer. So following thesis will cover insurance consumer protection mainly on insurer’s duty to deliver and explain the insurance clauses, insurance agency's authority, duty of disclosure related regulations,and regulation on period of extinction session on insurance claim.
참고문헌 (23)
- 양승규, "보험법개정의 관점" (2009), 청목출판사
- 최준선, "보험법 해상법 항공운송법" (2012), 삼영사
- 최준선, "상법총칙·상행위법" (2011), 삼영사
- 김선정, "일본의 보험법개정과 시사점 - 총론과 공통규정을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 28(4), pp.9~51 (2010), 한국상사법학회
- 김성태, "상법 보험편 개정의 입법적 기조", 법조, 56(10), pp.5~27 (2007), 법조협회
- 김원규, "고지의무의 수동화 논의에 대한 소고", 법학연구, (44), pp.289~306 (2011), 한국법학회
- 김은경, "보험계약 무효시 보험료반환청구와 소멸시효 ―대법원 2011.3.24. 선고 2010다92612 판결에 대한 평석―", 강원법학, 35, pp.425~445 (2012), 비교법학연구소
- 김은경, "독일보험계약법 개혁과 그 시사점", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.223~269 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 김은경, "독일보험계약법상 보험대리인의 대리권에 관한 고찰", 홍익법학, 12(1), pp.255~279 (2011), 법학연구소
- 박세민, "보험법 개정방향에 관한 연구", 법조, 55(5), pp.66~97 (2006), 법조협회
- 송호신, "보험약관의 교부ㆍ설명의무", 법학연구, (37), pp.319~344 (2010), 한국법학회
- 유주선, "독일과 일본의 보험계약법에서 소비자보호 추세", 무역보험연구, 11(4) (2010), 한국무역보험협회
- 이정원, "보험계약자의 고지의무위반과 보험자의 보험금지급책임에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, 53(3), pp.229~254 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이정표, "한국 상법 개정법률안(보험편)과 중국 보험법상 보험계약의 비교", 국제상학, 27(2), pp.47~67 (2012), 한국국제상학회[DOI]
- 장경환, "상법 제4편(보험법) 개정의견", 원광대학교 법학연구소, 21(2) (2005)
- 정찬형, "2007년 確定한 政府의 商法(保險編) 改正案에 대한 意見", 금융법연구, 4(2), pp.119~163 (2007), 한국금융법학회
- 정호열, "고지의무위반과 사기·착오, 불가쟁약관의 관계", 보험학회지, 29(1) (1987), 한국보험학회
- 최병규, "2007년 독일 보험법 개정과 시사점", 상사법연구, 28(4), pp.103~133 (2010), 한국상사법학회
- 최성호, "보험금청구권의 소멸시효에 관한 연구", 국제금융위험관리, 10(3) (2009), 한국무역보험협회
- 한기정, "고지의무의 수동화 - 자발적 고지의무에서 수동적 응답의무로 -", 비교사법, 16(3), pp.325~363 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
- 한창희, "상법 보험편 개정안에 대한 검토", 금융법연구, 5(2), pp.201~235 (2008), 한국금융법학회
- John Birds, "Modern Insurance Law" (1997), Sweet & Maxwell
- Robert MerKin, "Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance" (1990), Sweet & Maxwell
