본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보험자의 정보제공의무 도입방안에 관한 연구

A study on adopting a method to offer sufficient information to insured

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In insurance contract law it is very important that the insured has to get sufficient information from insurer. Nowadays the insurance contract is very complicated. Therefore it is not easy to understand the contract concretely. Disputes are arising from the fact whether the insurer has offered sufficient information to insured. Therefore the insurance contract law should burden the insurer to offer sufficient information to insured. Nowadays many countries are making effort to get better insurance contract law. Germany has reformed the insurance contract law thoroughly in 2007. Japan has new, separate insurance contract law since 2008. The current korean insurance contract law in korean commercial code was effected in 1963. It has many problems. § 638-3 korean commercial code regulates the duty of insurer to explain the insurance contract clauses. But it is not sufficient. In that regulation there is no content about the effect of non-explanation. And § 7 german insurance contract law(VVG) are the regulations that burden the insurer to offer sufficient information to insured by the process of making contract. When the insurer violates this regulation, the insured can cancel the contract in 14 days. It has more detailed contents as korean commercial code. For instance it is not regulated in korean commercial code expressly, then the insurer offer information and which informations should be delivered to insured. The german change in regard of offering informations to insured is key point of the reform of the year 2007. We should also regard this change in germany. The reform discussion about korean insurance contract law is being done in korean national assembly. The ministry of justice has also established a reform commission in the part of insurance contract law. By the reform discussion in korea we can also consider adopting more detailed regulations about agreed value. By the work the german example(§ 7 VVG) can give us good suggestions.

Abstract

In insurance contract law it is very important that the insured has to get sufficient information from insurer. Nowadays the insurance contract is very complicated. Therefore it is not easy to understand the contract concretely. Disputes are arising from the fact whether the insurer has offered sufficient information to insured. Therefore the insurance contract law should burden the insurer to offer sufficient information to insured. Nowadays many countries are making effort to get better insurance contract law. Germany has reformed the insurance contract law thoroughly in 2007. Japan has new, separate insurance contract law since 2008. The current korean insurance contract law in korean commercial code was effected in 1963. It has many problems. § 638-3 korean commercial code regulates the duty of insurer to explain the insurance contract clauses. But it is not sufficient. In that regulation there is no content about the effect of non-explanation. And § 7 german insurance contract law(VVG) are the regulations that burden the insurer to offer sufficient information to insured by the process of making contract. When the insurer violates this regulation, the insured can cancel the contract in 14 days. It has more detailed contents as korean commercial code. For instance it is not regulated in korean commercial code expressly, then the insurer offer information and which informations should be delivered to insured. The german change in regard of offering informations to insured is key point of the reform of the year 2007. We should also regard this change in germany. The reform discussion about korean insurance contract law is being done in korean national assembly. The ministry of justice has also established a reform commission in the part of insurance contract law. By the reform discussion in korea we can also consider adopting more detailed regulations about agreed value. By the work the german example(§ 7 VVG) can give us good suggestions.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김건식, "자본시장법" (2009), 두성사
  2. 김선정, "일본의 보험법개정과 시사점 - 총론과 공통규정을 중심으로", 상사법연구, 28(4), pp.9~51 (2010), 한국상사법학회
  3. 김은경, "독일보험계약법상 보험자의 정보제공의무 등에 대한 고찰", 기업법연구, 23(2), pp.169~192 (2009), 한국기업법학회
  4. 김은경, "보험계약법상 고지의무 및 설명의무에 대한 비교법적 고찰", 경영법률, 19(2), pp.447~487 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
  5. 김은경, "사법공통기준틀(CFR)과 유럽보험계약법의 원칙(PEICL)의 분석 -PEICL에 나타난 보험자의 정보제공의무를 중심으로", 외법논집, 34(3), pp.19~37 (2010), 법학연구소
  6. 김은경, "중국 개정 보험법에 따른 설명의무의 방향", 한양법학, (33), pp.237~254 (2011), 한양법학회
  7. 김형기, "일본 신보험법과 국내 상법과의 비교 고찰", 보험법연구, 3(2) (2009)
  8. 박세민, "보험법" (2011), 박영사
  9. 변제호, "자본시장법" (2009), 지원출판사
  10. 유주선, "보험자의 정보제공의무-독일과 한국의 비교법적인 관점에서-", 보험학회지, (79), pp.93~120 (2008), 한국보험학회
  11. 유주선, "2010년 보험업법의 주요 개정내용과 평가", 월간생명보험, (384) (2011)
  12. 이성남, "201년 개정 보험업법에 관한 고찰", 보험법연구, 4(2) (2010)
  13. 이필규, "2009년 독일 보험계약법" (2009), 세창출판사
  14. 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
  15. 최병규, "보험계약법의 바람직한 개정방향", 기업법연구, 24(3), pp.105~131 (2010), 한국기업법학회
  16. 최병규, "증권모델로부터 청약모델로의 변화와 이의약관", 재산법연구, 28(2), pp.303~326 (2011), 한국재산법학회
  17. 한창희, "정보비대칭하에서의 보험자의 정보제공의무", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.131~159 (2011), 법학연구소
  18. "Abschlussbericht der Kommission zur Reform des Versicherungsvertragsrechts vom 19", ~ (2004)
  19. Birds, "modern insurance law, 8th. ed" (2010), Sweet & Maxwell
  20. Bruck, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, Bd. I, 9. Aufl" (2008)
  21. Malcolm Clarke, "The law of insurance contracts" (2009)
  22. Halm, "Handbuch des Fachanwalts Versicherungsrecht, 3. Aufl" (2008), Luchterhand
  23. Langheid, "Münchener Kommentar zum Versicherungsvertragsgesetz", ~ (2010)
  24. "Niederleithinger, Auf dem Weg zu einer VVR-Reform, VersR 2006, S. 440 ff", ~ (2006)
  25. Looschelders, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (2010)
  26. Rüffer, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (2009), Baden-Baden
  27. Terbille, "Versicherungsrecht, Münchener Anwaltshandbuch, Bd. 1" (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)