민법의 일반법적 성질에 기초한 민법개정 제안
A Suggestion on the Amendment of the Civil Code based on the General legal nature
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper begins with the question, ‘It is evident that civil law is a general law of private law. Then, is civil law properly established as a general law?’ Law can be classified into general law and special law when classified by the scope of application. General Law is a law which is applied generally without a special limit in the scope of application while Special Law is a law that is applied limited to a special person, item, action, or place. Special law is legislated to regulate when an exceptional event occurs unexpectedly after the general law is established or when it is not appropriate to apply the general law as it is. Thus, the special law has precedence over the general law and the general law is applied complementally only when there is no regulation in the special law. When such classification is applied, civil law corresponds to the general law of private law. In other words, it is a general private law so it applies generally to anyone who is a human being. In this respect, a commercial law that is subject to businessmen is a special law of civil law. Of course, the classification of general law and special law is relative in that commercial law can also become a general law in terms of laws regarding e-commerce or special commercial law. Although the classification of general and special law is relative, civil law is a general law which cannot become a special law of any other law and thus is a ‘general law of general law’, which forms the basis for all private law. Thus, civil law must maintain its characteristics as a general law. This must be so that it can maintain a systematic status as a law that can be applied as a last resort on a given issue. And such system of private law must be kept in order to easily decide on which law to apply on an issue. However, civil law already has partial regulations that do not fit the characteristics of a general law ever since the legislation of civil law and there were also amendments that do not fit such characteristics during the recent civil law amendments. Such parts must be revised. In order to do so, we will examine the problematic sections of present regulations in civil law keeping in mind the general characteristics of civil law.
Abstract
This paper begins with the question, ‘It is evident that civil law is a general law of private law. Then, is civil law properly established as a general law?’ Law can be classified into general law and special law when classified by the scope of application. General Law is a law which is applied generally without a special limit in the scope of application while Special Law is a law that is applied limited to a special person, item, action, or place. Special law is legislated to regulate when an exceptional event occurs unexpectedly after the general law is established or when it is not appropriate to apply the general law as it is. Thus, the special law has precedence over the general law and the general law is applied complementally only when there is no regulation in the special law. When such classification is applied, civil law corresponds to the general law of private law. In other words, it is a general private law so it applies generally to anyone who is a human being. In this respect, a commercial law that is subject to businessmen is a special law of civil law. Of course, the classification of general law and special law is relative in that commercial law can also become a general law in terms of laws regarding e-commerce or special commercial law. Although the classification of general and special law is relative, civil law is a general law which cannot become a special law of any other law and thus is a ‘general law of general law’, which forms the basis for all private law. Thus, civil law must maintain its characteristics as a general law. This must be so that it can maintain a systematic status as a law that can be applied as a last resort on a given issue. And such system of private law must be kept in order to easily decide on which law to apply on an issue. However, civil law already has partial regulations that do not fit the characteristics of a general law ever since the legislation of civil law and there were also amendments that do not fit such characteristics during the recent civil law amendments. Such parts must be revised. In order to do so, we will examine the problematic sections of present regulations in civil law keeping in mind the general characteristics of civil law.
참고문헌 (79)
- 姜台星, "物權法(新版)" (2004), 大明出版社
- 郭潤直, "民法總則 第七版" (2002), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "物權法 新訂版" (1996), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "民法注解(Ⅰ)" (1992), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "民法注解(Ⅲ)" (1992), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "民法注解(Ⅵ)" (1992), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "民法注解(Ⅶ)" (1992), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "民法注解(Ⅺ)" (1997), 博英社
- 高翔龍, "民法總則 全訂版" (2001), 法文社
- 金大貞, "債權總論(改訂版)" (2007), 도서출판 fides
- 金大貞, "契約法(上)" (2007), 도서출판 fides
- 김동석, "법과 현대생활 개정판" (2003), 일조각
- 김문현, "법학입문 제5판" (2014), 법문사
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
- 金龍潭, "第4版 註釋民法總則(1)" (2010), 韓國司法行政學會
- 金疇洙, "債權各論" (1992), 三英社
- 金曾漢, "民法總則 第9版" (1995), 博英社
- 金曾漢, "債權各論 第7版" (2006), 博英社
- 金亨培, "債權各論<契約法> 新訂版" (2001), 博英社
- 金亨培, "債權總論(第2版)" (1998), 博英社
- 명순구, "민법총칙" (2005), 법문사
- 명순구, "실록 대한민국 민법 2" (2010), 법문사
- 명순구, "실록 대한민국 민법 3" (2010), 법문사
- 미승우, "새 맞춤법과 교정의 실제" (2000), 어문각
- 民事法硏究會, "民法案意見書" (1957), 一潮閣
- 民議院 法制司法委員會 民法案審議小委員會, "民法案審議録 上巻" (1957), 民議院 法制司法委員會
- 기본법의 입법모델연구, "박영도", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2006)
- 박영도, "입법학 입문" (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 특별법 입법체계 개선방안, "박영도", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2012)
- 方順元, "新物權法" (1960), 一輯圖書出版社
- 法務部, "民法(財産編)改正資料集", 法務資料, 260 (2004), 法務部
- 법무부 민법개정자료발간팀, "2013년 개정 민법 자료집 上" (2013), 법무부
- 법무부 민법개정자료발간팀, "2013년 법무부 민법개정시안 –물권편-" (2013), 법무부
- 법무부 민법개정자료발간팀, "2013년 법무부 민법개정시안 –조문편-" (2013), 법무부
- 法院行政處, "主要 舊法令集(上)", 裁判資料, 41 (1987), 法院行政處
- 송덕수, "민법총칙" (2011), 박영사
- 申昌淳, "國語近代表記法의 展開" (2003), 太學社
- 李時潤, "新民事訴訟法" (2003), 博英社
- 李英俊, "物權法(新訂版)" (2001), 博英社
- 李銀榮, "民法總則(第5版)" (2009), 博英社
- 李銀榮, "債權總論(改訂版)" (1999), 博英社
- 李銀榮, "債權各論 第3版" (1999), 博英社
- 張庚鶴, "新物權法各論 下卷" (1960), 一韓圖書出版社
- 全秉翼, "區分所有權法 -아파트法律과 理論-" (1997), 도서출판 해오름
- 鄭東潤, "民事訴訟法(제2판)" (2007), 法文社
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상) 제16판" (2013), 박영사
- 崔泰永, "現行 어음·수표法" (1953), 中央大學校出版部
- 我妻榮, "擔保物權法" (1952), 文星堂
- 我妻榮, "債權總論" (1954), 文星堂
- 石田文次郞, "擔保物權法論(下卷)" (1936), 有斐閣
- 石田文次郞, "滿洲民法(擔保物權)" (1943), 有斐閣
- 木村健助, "佛蘭西民法(Ⅳ) 財産取得法(3)" (1956), 有斐閣
- 岡松參太郞, "註釋民法理由債權篇 九版" (1899), 有斐閣書房
- 於保不二雄, "民法總則講義" (1951), 有信堂
- 勝本正晃, "擔保物權法(上卷)" (1949), 有斐閣
- 末川博, "物權法" (1956), 日本評論社
- 領木竹雄, "手形法·小切手法" (1957), 有斐閣
- 廣中俊雄, "民法修正案(前三編)の理由書" (1987), 有斐閣
- 柚木馨, "判例物權法各論" (1936), 巌松堂
- 柚木馨, "判例債權法總論(下卷)" (1951), 有斐閣
- 강혁신, "일본의 ‘건물의 구분소유 등에 관한 법률’에 있어서의 區分所有權의 動態", 민사법학, 43(1), pp.167~201 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 金炳魯, "重複賣買와 危險負擔", 法學界, (3) (1915)
- 南孝淳, "賣買에 있어서 목적물의 果實과 代金의 利子의 관계", 法政考試, 3(5) (1997)
- 明淳龜, "特定物債權의 目的物로부터 發生한 天然果實의 歸屬", 法政考試, 2(9) (1996)
- 閔賢植, "開化期 國語 文體에 대한 綜合的 硏究(1)", 국어교육, 83 (1994), 한국어교육학회
- 박동진, "알기 쉬운 민법 만들기", 민사법학, (42), pp.151~196 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 梁彰洙, "民法案의 成立過程에 관한 小考", 民法硏究, 1 (1991), 博英社
- 梁彰洙, "危險負擔", 考試硏究, 17(12) (1990)
- 이홍민, "민법 제정과 그 성과 분석", 박사, 법학, pp.2011
- 이홍민, "민법의 제정과정을 통해 살펴 본 민법개정 제안", 강원법학, 35, pp.347~386 (2012), 비교법학연구소
- 이홍민, "‘허락을 얻은 특정한 영업’에 대한 한정치산자의 행위능력 ― 비교법과 입법과정을 통해 본 민법 제10조의 문제점 ―", 민사법학, (42), pp.519~560 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 황희윤, "민법 알기 쉽게 새로 쓰기", 고려법학, (72), pp.515~563 (2014), 법학연구원
- 井野英一, "滿洲國司法立法の沿革並に司法官の身分保障制に就て", 法律時報, 11(6) (1939)
- "제26회 국회정기회의속기록 제42호", 국회사무처, ~ (1957)
- "제26회 국회정기회의속기록 제48호", 국회사무처, ~ (1957)
- "제120회 국회 법제사법위원회회의록 제1호", 국회사무처, ~ (1984)
- "제121회 국회 법제사법위원회회의록 제6호", 국회사무처, ~ (1984)
- "개정민법조문의 용어가 혼란스럽다"[URL]
- "'법령용어 순화'의 문제점"[URL]