外國資本의 敵對的 M&A에 관한 硏究
Legal Issues on Hostile M&A by Foreign Capital
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The inflow of foreign capital into the Korean domestic market has greatly increased since the financial crisis in 1997. In this globalization of capital markets, domestic companies enter foreign capital markets, foreign companies enter domestic capital markets or foreign capital flows into domestic markets. In case of primary offerings by foreign companies into domestic securities markets, major issue is which disclosures standards the foreign companies should comply with. In cases of inflow of foreign capital into domestic securities markets, major issues are the defensive actions against the threat of hostile M&A by foreign capital and regulation of foreign capital. It cannot be denied that the increased inflow of foreign capital into Korea has had positive economic effects on the Korean capital market, but concerns about the negative effects of foreign capital have been raised. However, positive side of foreign capital needs to be encouraged, and better means of addressing the threat of hostile M&A by foreign capital may be the reform of corporate governance through continued market reform and the extension of securities market through promotion of capital markets rather than the introduction of new tactics for the protection of management rights, the abolition of market reform systems or the special regulation of foreign capital
Abstract
The inflow of foreign capital into the Korean domestic market has greatly increased since the financial crisis in 1997. In this globalization of capital markets, domestic companies enter foreign capital markets, foreign companies enter domestic capital markets or foreign capital flows into domestic markets. In case of primary offerings by foreign companies into domestic securities markets, major issue is which disclosures standards the foreign companies should comply with. In cases of inflow of foreign capital into domestic securities markets, major issues are the defensive actions against the threat of hostile M&A by foreign capital and regulation of foreign capital. It cannot be denied that the increased inflow of foreign capital into Korea has had positive economic effects on the Korean capital market, but concerns about the negative effects of foreign capital have been raised. However, positive side of foreign capital needs to be encouraged, and better means of addressing the threat of hostile M&A by foreign capital may be the reform of corporate governance through continued market reform and the extension of securities market through promotion of capital markets rather than the introduction of new tactics for the protection of management rights, the abolition of market reform systems or the special regulation of foreign capital
참고문헌 (8)
- 권재열, "적대적 M&A에 대한 방어방법의 현실적 평가 - 오호적인 주주의 확보에 의한 경우를 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 19(2) (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 권종호, "일본의 적대적 M&A 현황과 방어수단에 관한 최근 동향", 상장협, (52) (2005), 한국상장회사협의회
- 김두식, "M&A 법제의 개선방안 연구", 상장협, (50) (2004)
- 송종준, "적대적 M&A 방어를 위한 법적과제", 기업법연구, 18(2) (2004), 한국기업법학회
- 송종준, "외국인 M&A에 대한 규제완화와 그 법적 한계", 비교사법, 10(3) (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 송종준, "M&A에 대한 주요방어대책", 상사법연구, 14(1), 한국상사법학회
- 이규수, "자본시장의 국제화에 따른 법적과제에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 전삼현, "M&A관련 역차별적인 규제의 개선방안", 상장협, (52) (2005), 한국상장회사협의회
