본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

外國證券의 公示規制 立法에 관한 考察 - 美國法과의 比較를 中心으로 -

A Comparative Analysis of the Regulatory Approach in Foreign Securities Disclosure

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

These days, the globalization of capital markets has increased with deregulation, liberalization of capital flows and companies enter foreign capital markets to raise capital. Consequently, sometimes companies are required to observe foreign corporation laws or securities laws and it is necessary to consider disclosure rules for foreign securities. In the United States, foreign companies should comply with the U.S. disclosure system although they are subject to somewhat different requirements than domestic companies. However, this system increases disclosure costs and deters effective regulatory competition with foreign markets. And the foreign integrated disclosure system is not effective in regulatory competition with foreign disclosure system. Relaxing disclosure requirements for foreign companies might create an inequity for domestic companies. For the reform of disclosure rules, new theoretical proposals have been suggested arguing that the entire body of current U.S. securities laws should be replaced by a new statutory framework: the issuer choice approach and the issuer nationality approach. On the contrary, the world’s securities regulators suggest the replacement of domestic disclosure regimes with unified disclosure standards to be used in all international offerings: the harmonization approach. In Korea, the government has promoted the plans about globalization of capital markets since 1980’s and recently three foreign companies have listed their securities on Korea’s stock exchanges or KOSDAQ. Although foreign companies are subject to more or less different requirements than domestic companies, generally they should observe the Korea disclosure system according to the current securities laws. To increase international competitiveness by achieving an appropriate balance between attracting foreign companies and protecting domestic investors, it is necessary to modify and reform domestic rules and systems within international standards.

Abstract

These days, the globalization of capital markets has increased with deregulation, liberalization of capital flows and companies enter foreign capital markets to raise capital. Consequently, sometimes companies are required to observe foreign corporation laws or securities laws and it is necessary to consider disclosure rules for foreign securities. In the United States, foreign companies should comply with the U.S. disclosure system although they are subject to somewhat different requirements than domestic companies. However, this system increases disclosure costs and deters effective regulatory competition with foreign markets. And the foreign integrated disclosure system is not effective in regulatory competition with foreign disclosure system. Relaxing disclosure requirements for foreign companies might create an inequity for domestic companies. For the reform of disclosure rules, new theoretical proposals have been suggested arguing that the entire body of current U.S. securities laws should be replaced by a new statutory framework: the issuer choice approach and the issuer nationality approach. On the contrary, the world’s securities regulators suggest the replacement of domestic disclosure regimes with unified disclosure standards to be used in all international offerings: the harmonization approach. In Korea, the government has promoted the plans about globalization of capital markets since 1980’s and recently three foreign companies have listed their securities on Korea’s stock exchanges or KOSDAQ. Although foreign companies are subject to more or less different requirements than domestic companies, generally they should observe the Korea disclosure system according to the current securities laws. To increase international competitiveness by achieving an appropriate balance between attracting foreign companies and protecting domestic investors, it is necessary to modify and reform domestic rules and systems within international standards.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. 김건식, "미국의 증권규제" (2001), 홍문사
  2. 석명철, "미국증권관계법: 미국의 시장원리와 그 운용" (2001), 박영사
  3. 최운열, "투자론" (1999), 박영사
  4. 강희주, "국제 주식거래의 현황과 과제", BFL, (13) (2005), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  5. 금융감독원, "금융감독정보?제2005-43호" (2005)
  6. 금융감독원, "외국기업의 상장을 위한 시장제도 개선 금융감독원 보도자료", ~ (2005)
  7. 이성웅, "영국법상 외국증권에 대한 공시규제", 기업법연구, 19(3)통권 : 22 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  8. 靑木浩子, "國際證券取引と開示規制" (2000), 東京大學出版會
  9. Hal S.Scott, "International Finance: Law and Regulation" (2004), Sweet & Maxwell
  10. Harold S. Bloomenthal, "10E International Capital Markets and Securities Regulation" (2001)
  11. John C. Coffee, "Sale, Federal Securities Laws, 2006 ed." (2006), Foundation Press
  12. Louis Loss, "Fundamentals of Securities Regulation, 4th ed." (2001), Aspen Law & Business
  13. Marc I. Steinberg, "International Securities Law: A Contemporary and Comparative Analysis 35" (1999)
  14. Alan R. Palmiter, "Toward Disclosure Choice in Securities Offerings" (1999), 1999 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 1
  15. Andrea J. Roquette, "New Developments Relating to the Internationalization of the Capital Markets: A Comparison of Legislative Reforms in the United States, the European Community and Germany" (1994), 14 U. Pa. J. Int’l. Bus. L. 565
  16. Bevis Longstreth, "A Look at the SEC’s Adaptation to Global Market Pressures" (1995), 33 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 319
  17. Brian J. Lane, "Foreign Issuers and the U.S. Market", pp.1997, 1011 PLI
  18. Daniel A. Braverman, "U.S. Legal Consideration Affecting Global Offerings of Shares in Foreign Companies" (1996), 17 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 30
  19. David E. Van Zandt, "The Regulatory and Institutional Conditions for an International Securities Markets" (1991), 32 Va. J. Int’l L. 47
  20. Decker, William E., "The Attraction of the U.S. Securities Markets to Foriegn Issuers and the Alternative Methods of Accessing the U.S. Markets: From the Issuer’s Perspective" (1994), 17 Fordham International Law Journal S10
  21. Division of Corporate Finance, "Current Issues and Rulemaking Projects (November 14, 2000)", pp.2002, 1283 Practising Law Institute
  22. E. Waider Warner, "Mutual Recognition and Cross-Border Financial Services in the European Community", Law & Contemp. Probs, 55(7) (1992), Duke Uni. School of Law
  23. Edmund W. Kitch, "The Theory and Practice of Securities Disclosure" (1995), 61 Broook. L. Rev. 763
  24. Edmund W. Kitch, "Proposals for Reform of Securities Regulation: An Overview" (2001), 41 Va. J. Int’l L. 629
  25. Edward F. Greene, "Hegemony or Deference: U.S. Disclosure Requirements in the International Capital Markets" (1995), 50 Bus. Law. 413
  26. Edward F. Greene, "Building on the International Convergence of the Global Markets: A Model for Securities Law Reform", pp.2001, 1281 PLI
  27. Edward Rock, "Securities Regulations as Lobster Trab: A Credible Commitment Theory of Mandatory Disclosure" (2002), 23 Cardozo L. Rev. 675
  28. Gary C. Biddle, "The Effects of International Disclosure Levels on Firms’ Choices Among Alternative Foreign Stock Exchange? Listings" (1989), 1 J. Int’l Fin. Manag. & Acct. 55
  29. Grasso, Richard, "Globalization of the Equity Markets" (1997), 20 Fordham Int’l L. J. 1109
  30. Gunnar Schuster, "Extraterritoriality of Securities Laws: An Economic Analysis of Jurisdictional Conflicts" (1994), 26 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 165
  31. Harold S. Bloomenthal, "“Transnational Aspect of U.S. Securities Laws”, in 10C International Capital Markets and Securities Regulation, 5-176" (1982)
  32. Howell E. Jackson, "Regulatory Competition in International Securities Markets: Evidence from Europe in 1999-Part 1" (2001), 56 Bus. Law. 653
  33. J. William, Hicks, "Protection of Individual Investors under U.S. Securities Law: The Impact of International regulatory Competition" (1994), 1 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 431
  34. James A. Fanto, "A Report on the Attitudes of Foreign Companies Regarding a U.S. Listing" (1997), 3 Stan. J. L. Bus. & Fin. 51
  35. James D. Cox, "Rethinking U.S. Securities Law in the Shadow of International Regulatory Competition" (1992), 55 AUT Law & Contemp. Probs. 157
  36. James L. Cochrane, "Are U.S. Regulatory Requirements for Foreign Firms Appropriate?" (1994), 17 Fordham Int’l L. J. S58
  37. James R. Silkenat, "Overview of Securities markets and Foreign Issuers" (1994), 17 Fordham Int’l L. J. S4
  38. Joel Seligman, "The Internationalization of the Securities Markets: Preface to a Symposium" (1988), 9 Mich. Y.B. Int’l Legal Stud. 1
  39. Joel Seligman, "The Mandatory Disclosure System and Foreign Firms" (1995), 4 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 807
  40. Lewis D. Solomon, "The Impact of technology on the Trading of Securities: The Emerging Global Market and the Implications for Regulation" (1991), 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 299
  41. M. Elizabeth Rader, "Accounting Issues in Cross-Border Securities Offerings" (1994), 17 Fordham Int’l L. J. S129
  42. Marc I. Steinberg, "Curtailing Investor Protection under the Securities Laws: Good for the Economy?" (2002), 55 SMU L. Rev. 347
  43. Mark Gillen, "The Convergence of Securities Laws and Implications for Developing Securities Markets" (1998), 24 N.C. J. INt’l L. & Com. Reg. 83
  44. Matson, Gregory K., "Restricting the Jurisdiction of American Courts Over Transnational Securities Fraud" (1990), 79 Geo. L. J. 141
  45. Maura B. Perry, "A Challenge Postponed: Market 2000 Complacency in response to Regulatory Competition for International Equity markets" (1994), 34 Va. J. Int’l L. 701
  46. Merritt B. Fox, "Securities Disclosure in a Globalizing Market: Who Should Regulate Whom" (1997), 95 Mich. L. Rev. 2498
  47. Merritt B. Fox, "The Political Economy of Statutory Reach: U.S. Disclosure Rules in a Globalizing Market for Securities" (1998), 97 Mich. L. Rev. 696
  48. Merritt B. Fox, "The Securities Globalization Disclosure Debate" (2000), 78 Wash. U.L.Q. 567
  49. Corporate Law and Practice Course Handbook Series 467, "International Financial Reporting and Disclosure Issues, 1281, Practising Law Institute", pp.2001, Michael McAlevey
  50. Mustafa N. Gultekin, "Capital Controls and International Capital Market Segmentation: The Evidence from the Japanese and American Stock Markets" (1989), 44 J. Fin. 849
  51. Nicholas G. Demmo, "U.S. Securities Regulation: The Need for Modification to Keep Pace with Globalization" (1996), 17 U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 691
  52. Richard C. Breeden, "Foreign Companies and U.S. Securities Markets in a Time of Economic Transformation" (1994), 17 Fordham Int’l L. J. S77
  53. Richard Kosnik, "The Role of the SEC in Evaluating Foreign Issuers Coming to U.S. Markets" (1994), 17 Fordham Int’l L. J. S97
  54. Roberta Romano, "Empowering Investors: A Market Approach to Securities Regulation" (1998), 107 Yale L. J. 2359
  55. Roberta Romano, "The Need for Competition in International Securities Regulation" (2001), 2 Theoretical Inquiries L. 387
  56. Simon Sackman, "Legal Aspects of a Global securities Market”, in The Future for the Global Securities Market, 19" (1996)
  57. Stephen J. Choi, "The Dangerous Extraterritoriality of American Securities Law" (1996), 17 Nw. J. Int,l L. & Bus. 207
  58. Stephen J. Choi, "Portable Reciprocity: Rethinking the International Reach of Securities Regulation" (1998), 71 S. Cal. L. Rev. 903
  59. Stephen J. Choi, "Assessing Regulatory Response to Securities Market Globalization" (2001), 2 Theoretical Inquiries L. 613
  60. Steve Walt, "Introduction: Privatization and Its Prospects" (2001), 41 Va. J. Int’l L. 517
  61. Uri Geiger, "The Case for the Harmonization of Securities Disclosure Rules in the Global Market" (1997), 1997 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 241
  62. Uri Geiger, "Harmonization of Securities Disclosure Rules in the Global Market-A Proposal" (1998), 66 Fordham L. Rev. 1785
  63. Walter G. Van Dorn, "International Securities Offerings, in Financial Product Fundamentals, 3-2" (2000)
  64. William E. Decker, "The Attraction of the U.S. Securities Markets to Foreign Issuers and the Alternative Methods of Accessing the U.S. Markets: From the Issuer’s Perspective" (1994), 17 Fordham International Law Journal, S10

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)