본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

간접사실에 관한 자백

Confession to Indirect Facts

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Defined as a party's depositions including the deposition about facts to be identical with other party's assertion and to be disadvantageous for him,the deposition to acknowledge other party's assertion which is disadvantageous to him, the deposition to acknowledge other party's assertion true and the deposition not to argue with other party in any condition during oral defence and defence preparation procedure. When these confessions are once established, on the one hand, they bind court and prohibit to use the fact contrary to them as basic facts for a judgement. It is the binding for the original intention of confession, the second theses of Closing Note. So the fact confessed need not to be proved, as a result of it, inquiry is promoted. On the other, if a confession is established, the fact confessed may become in fact spurious certificate,so other party may forget an aggressive activity for collecting evidences to the facts confessed. The reliability from other party should be protected. Accordingly, a confessor is bound by it and can not freely retrieve it unlike simple facts. it is the binding to a party, self-binding. The effect of confession reaches to even the inquiry of high court. Additionally, the confession in justice is acknowledged only in the procedure to adopt Closing Note, and is not acknowledged in the procedure to adopt Attention to detect misconduct. The necessary requirements to establish confessions can be summarized as follows ① a confess should be made on the concrete facts ② a confession should be a deposition done during defence or defence preparation procedure. additionally ③ a confession should be identical with other party's assertion on the facts ④ a confession should be a deposition to be disadvantageous for the confessor. In the above 4 requirements to be a confession, in the light of interpretation, problematic issues are specially ① and ④. Regarding the essential condition of ①, there are issues about whether the object of confession is limited only to key facts or to include indirect fact and accessorial fact, and about whether those confessions on right or legal relationships except for the above can be the object of confession, Regarding the essential condition of ④, in case of disadvantageous deposition to the confessor. what is an actual disadvantage to the confessor. In this regards, as the object of confession is a concrete fact, principally a minor premise of legal syllogism, the existence, contents, interpretation about a rule of thumb and legislation, that judiciary has to know well, can not be a confession in justice though there could be some conflicts between parties,For the matter about what confession means, it goes without saying that key fact can be an object of confession through the things that the binding for confession is based on Closing note and it is reasonable to apply Closing note to key fact at least. But a common view and a judicial precedent negate the binding of indirect fact which needs confirmation on the key facts, though both party's depositions are same. On the other hand,the binding of confession is acknowledged by the petition through the establishment of documentary evidence specially, which is accepted as a key fact, among accessorial facts. But some theories claim strongly to acknowledge the confessions for indirect facts and accessorial facts recently. So this study tries to define the concept and classification of key fact and indirect fact in advance, and the binding on the original intention of confession for indirect fact, and the binding to the confessor for researching the issues about whether the fact to be a object of confession is limited to key fact or indirect fact is also included for the requirements to establish confessions.

Abstract

Defined as a party's depositions including the deposition about facts to be identical with other party's assertion and to be disadvantageous for him,the deposition to acknowledge other party's assertion which is disadvantageous to him, the deposition to acknowledge other party's assertion true and the deposition not to argue with other party in any condition during oral defence and defence preparation procedure. When these confessions are once established, on the one hand, they bind court and prohibit to use the fact contrary to them as basic facts for a judgement. It is the binding for the original intention of confession, the second theses of Closing Note. So the fact confessed need not to be proved, as a result of it, inquiry is promoted. On the other, if a confession is established, the fact confessed may become in fact spurious certificate,so other party may forget an aggressive activity for collecting evidences to the facts confessed. The reliability from other party should be protected. Accordingly, a confessor is bound by it and can not freely retrieve it unlike simple facts. it is the binding to a party, self-binding. The effect of confession reaches to even the inquiry of high court. Additionally, the confession in justice is acknowledged only in the procedure to adopt Closing Note, and is not acknowledged in the procedure to adopt Attention to detect misconduct. The necessary requirements to establish confessions can be summarized as follows ① a confess should be made on the concrete facts ② a confession should be a deposition done during defence or defence preparation procedure. additionally ③ a confession should be identical with other party's assertion on the facts ④ a confession should be a deposition to be disadvantageous for the confessor. In the above 4 requirements to be a confession, in the light of interpretation, problematic issues are specially ① and ④. Regarding the essential condition of ①, there are issues about whether the object of confession is limited only to key facts or to include indirect fact and accessorial fact, and about whether those confessions on right or legal relationships except for the above can be the object of confession, Regarding the essential condition of ④, in case of disadvantageous deposition to the confessor. what is an actual disadvantage to the confessor. In this regards, as the object of confession is a concrete fact, principally a minor premise of legal syllogism, the existence, contents, interpretation about a rule of thumb and legislation, that judiciary has to know well, can not be a confession in justice though there could be some conflicts between parties,For the matter about what confession means, it goes without saying that key fact can be an object of confession through the things that the binding for confession is based on Closing note and it is reasonable to apply Closing note to key fact at least. But a common view and a judicial precedent negate the binding of indirect fact which needs confirmation on the key facts, though both party's depositions are same. On the other hand,the binding of confession is acknowledged by the petition through the establishment of documentary evidence specially, which is accepted as a key fact, among accessorial facts. But some theories claim strongly to acknowledge the confessions for indirect facts and accessorial facts recently. So this study tries to define the concept and classification of key fact and indirect fact in advance, and the binding on the original intention of confession for indirect fact, and the binding to the confessor for researching the issues about whether the fact to be a object of confession is limited to key fact or indirect fact is also included for the requirements to establish confessions.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 강현중, "민사소송법(제6판)" (2004), 박영사
  2. 金祥源, "註釋민사소송법Ⅴ" (2004), 한국사법행정학회
  3. 김홍규, "民事訴訟法" (2008), 三英社
  4. 방순원, "民事訴訟法" (1987), 한국사법행정학회
  5. 송상현, "民事訴訟法(新訂5版)" (2008), 博英社
  6. 이시윤, "新民事訴訟法(第2版)" (2005), 博英社
  7. 정동윤, "民事訴訟法" (2005), 法文社
  8. 정영환, "新民事訴訟法" (2009), 세창출판사
  9. 韓宗烈, "韓國民事訴訟法(上)" (1993), 慶北大學校出版部(대학출판사)
  10. 호문혁, "民事訴訟法" (2006), 法文社
  11. 홍기문, "民事訴訟法" (2005), 대명출판사
  12. 강현중, "재판상 자백의 대상" (1985), 論點 民事訴訟法
  13. 오용호, "변론주의에 관한 소고" (1984), 溫山 방순원선생 고희기념논문집
  14. 홍기문, "民事訴訟에 있어서 주요사실과 간접사실의 구별에 관한 小考", 법률행정논문집, 1 (1991), 전남대학교법률행정연구소
  15. 피정현, "재판상 자백의 성립요건으로서의 자백의 대상 - 간접사실ㆍ보조사실의 자백을 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 14(3), pp.1137~1160 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
  16. 加藤新太郞, "主要事實と間接事實の區別. in: 民事訴訟法の爭點", ジュリスト增刊, (3) (1998), 有斐閣
  17. 高橋宏志, "重点講義民事訴訟法" (2006), 有斐閣
  18. 兼子一, "條解民事訴訟法" (1986), 弘文堂
  19. 吉野正三郞, "權利自白はなぜ難しぃのか. in: 民事訴訟法のアプりオ" (1995), 成文堂
  20. 木川統一郞, "權利自白. in: 民事訴訟法重要問題講義(中)" (1992), 成文堂
  21. 山木戶克己, "自由心證と擧證責任. in: 大阪學院法學硏究" (1981), 大阪學院
  22. 山本和彦, "民事訴訟法の基本問題" (2002), 判例タイムズ社
  23. 三ケ月章, "民事訴訟法」(第三版)" (1992), 弘文堂
  24. 小林秀之, "新民事訴訟法" (2005), 判例タイムズ社
  25. 小林秀之, "新證據法", 弘文堂 (2003)
  26. 松本博之, "民事自白法", 弘文堂 (1994)
  27. 新堂幸司, "新民事訴訟法" (2003), 弘文堂
  28. 伊藤眞, "民事訴訟法" (1998), 有斐閣
  29. 田尾桃二, "主要事實と間接事實に關する二,三の疑問. in: 裁判法の諸問題(中)" (1969), 有斐閣
  30. 竹下守夫, "辯論主義. in: 演習民事訴訟法" (1987), 靑林書院
  31. 中野貞一郞, "民事證據法論集" (1999), 有斐閣
  32. 奧博司, "裁判上の自白. in: 民事訴訟法の爭點" (1998), 有斐閣
  33. 倉田卓次, "一般條項と證明責任. in: 民事實務と證明論" (1987), 日本評論社
  34. 春日徫知郞, "民事證據法論集" (1995), 有斐閣
  35. Bender-Belz-Wax, "Das Verfahren nach der Vereinfachungsnovelle und vordem Familiengericht", ~ (1977)
  36. Bernhardt, "Das Zivilprozeßrecht, 3. Aufl", Berlin, ~ (1978)
  37. L.Rosenberg, "Zivilprozeßrecht, 13. Aufl", München, ~ (1981)
  38. L.Rosenberg, "Zivilprozessrecht, 14. Aufl", München, ~ (1984)
  39. Othmar Jauerning, "Zivilprozeßrecht, 28, Aufl", Munchen, ~ (1985)
  40. Schonke-Kuchinke, "ZivilprozeBordnung, 20. Aufl", Tubingen, ~ (1977)
  41. wassermann, "Der soziale Zivilprozeß", ~ (1978)
  42. Clark, "Handbook of the Law of Code Pleading, 2nd ed", ~ (1947)
  43. Cook, "Statement of Fact in Pleading under Codes", Columbia Law Review, 21 (1921)
  44. Cook, "Fact and Statement of Fact", Chicago Law Review, 4 (1937)
  45. James, "Civil Procedure, 2nd" (1977), Little
  46. Moris, "Law and Fact", Havard Law Riview, 55 (1942)
  47. Wnght, "Federal Practice and Procedure", ~ (1940)
  48. "법률종합정보"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)