자백의 증명력 판단에 관한 실질적 기준의 정립
Actual Criterion To Judge Probative Force Of Confession
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, through case analysis and psychological91) approach to determine the credibility of a confession objective and analytical methods to determine the authenticity of the confessions, but on a regular basis is presented, the judge suggested to the state standards. Confessions obtained through analysis of case judgments about the credibility of the established criteria are as follows. Confessions of information and meet such an objective fact, confessed to the content that appears on the motive, murder weapon, experience and objective statements, and discovery of a secret to confess their own judgments about the rationality or the time and change of confession as a confession of the cause and the Inspector, relationship with the victim, the defendant's conduct after the crime and the circumstances, because an appeal, the withdrawal of charges that the defendant's education, career, life, environmental and internal circumstances of the accused may be divided into. And the last criteria to be applied in dubio pro reo principle will be called.
Abstract
In this study, through case analysis and psychological91) approach to determine the credibility of a confession objective and analytical methods to determine the authenticity of the confessions, but on a regular basis is presented, the judge suggested to the state standards. Confessions obtained through analysis of case judgments about the credibility of the established criteria are as follows. Confessions of information and meet such an objective fact, confessed to the content that appears on the motive, murder weapon, experience and objective statements, and discovery of a secret to confess their own judgments about the rationality or the time and change of confession as a confession of the cause and the Inspector, relationship with the victim, the defendant's conduct after the crime and the circumstances, because an appeal, the withdrawal of charges that the defendant's education, career, life, environmental and internal circumstances of the accused may be divided into. And the last criteria to be applied in dubio pro reo principle will be called.
참고문헌 (28)
- 경찰청, "2009년도 범죄통계" (2010), 경찰청 수사국
- 증거의 신빙성 제고를 위한 효과적인 증거수집 및 현출방안, "류혁상", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
- 박노섭, "형사소송법상 참고인 진술의 문제점", 경찰학연구, (6), pp.46~70 (2004), 경찰대학
- 하태인, "자백의 신빙성 판단에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2010
- 光藤景晈, "再審からみた事實誤認" (1980), 判例タイムズ 社
- 吉永祐介, "自白の信用性の檢証に關する諸問題など", 早法, 73(11) (1997), 早稻田法學會
- 吉原公一郞, "松川事件の眞犯人" (2007), 祥伝社文庫
- 大野恒太郞, "自白, 刑事手續(下)" (1988), 筑摩書房
- 大竹武七郞外, "事実認定における裁判官の判斷", 法律時報, 36(2) (1985), 判例タイムズ社
- 渡部保夫, "無罪の發見 : 證據の分析と判斷基準" (1992), 勁草書房
- 渡部保夫, "自白の信用性の判斷基準と注意側について", ~ (1982)
- 木谷明, "自白の信用性の評価, 刑訴法の爭点" (2000), 有斐閣
- 木谷明, "刑事裁判の心: 事實認定適正化の方策" (2005), 法律文化社
- 阪村幸男, "自白の任意性と信用性をめぐる判例理論; 竹津哲夫先生占稀祝賀記念論文集" (1998), 現代人文社
- 白取祐司, "刑事訴訟法 第3版" (2004), 日本評論社
- 山崎兵八, "現場刑事の告發－二俣事件の眞相" (1997), ふくろう書房
- 上田誠吉, "誤まった裁判 ―八つの刑事事件―" (1960), 岩波書店
- 石井一正, "刑事實務證據法 2版" (1999), 判例タイムズ 社
- 松永憲生, "逆轉無罪" (1979), 現代史出版會
- ウンドイッチ, "証言の心理" (1973), 東京大學出版會
- 田宮 裕, "セミナ― 刑事手續法 證據編" (1999), 啓正社
- 中川孝博, "自白調書の信用性評價に關する試論" (2005), 日本評論社
- 村瀨均, "自白の信用性の評價, 刑事訴訟法の爭點 第3版" (2002), 有斐閣
- 村井敏邦, "刑事司法と心理學" (2005), 日本評論社
- 出射義夫, "犯罪搜査の基礎理論" (1953)
- 橫山晃一郞, "誤判の 構造-日本型刑事裁判の光と影石" (1985), 日本評論社
- 河井信太郎, "檢察讀本: 일본 검찰의 수사지침서" (2004), 법무부
- "대법원종합법률정보"[URL]