보호감호의 재도입론에 대한 검토
A Study on Re-introduction of Protective Supervision
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Justice Ministry has announced to enact an amendment of criminal law to reintroduce protective supervision on October 25, 2010. The protective supervision was introduced in 1980 and abandoned in 2005 as the Society Protection Law was revoked. After 5 years since the revocation,the protective supervision is facing reintroduction to criminal law. The reason for re-adopting the protective supervision is that the protective supervision is an alternative to efficiently manage violent and habitual criminals. The amendment of criminal law has adopted new policies to resolve problems that previous protective supervision had to justify its reintroduction. Nonetheless, there are some doubts on the necessity and justification of adopting the protective supervision. Especially, the National Assembly has amended some provisions of criminal law to increase the maximum sentence from 15 years to 30 years, and up to 50 years for additional violation on April 15, 2010. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the necessity of reintroducing the protective supervision. This study has reviewed the necessity of the protective supervision that is more likely to be adopted. Moreover, this study has proposed the injustice of reintroducing the protective supervision after carefully examining the amended provisions. On the other hand, this study has further proposed an appropriate revision of the provisions if it is inevitable to reintroduce the protective supervision.
Abstract
The Justice Ministry has announced to enact an amendment of criminal law to reintroduce protective supervision on October 25, 2010. The protective supervision was introduced in 1980 and abandoned in 2005 as the Society Protection Law was revoked. After 5 years since the revocation,the protective supervision is facing reintroduction to criminal law. The reason for re-adopting the protective supervision is that the protective supervision is an alternative to efficiently manage violent and habitual criminals. The amendment of criminal law has adopted new policies to resolve problems that previous protective supervision had to justify its reintroduction. Nonetheless, there are some doubts on the necessity and justification of adopting the protective supervision. Especially, the National Assembly has amended some provisions of criminal law to increase the maximum sentence from 15 years to 30 years, and up to 50 years for additional violation on April 15, 2010. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the necessity of reintroducing the protective supervision. This study has reviewed the necessity of the protective supervision that is more likely to be adopted. Moreover, this study has proposed the injustice of reintroducing the protective supervision after carefully examining the amended provisions. On the other hand, this study has further proposed an appropriate revision of the provisions if it is inevitable to reintroduce the protective supervision.
참고문헌 (24)
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2009), 홍문사
- 사회보호법상 보호감호제도 실태연구, "송문호", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2003)
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2009), 법문사
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2010), 박영사
- 보호감호의 실태와 개선방안, "장규원", 형사정책연구원, ~ (1993)
- 형법개정법률안 제안이유서, "법무부", 형사법개정자료ⅩⅣ, ~ (1992)
- 사회보호법폐지법률안 심사보고서, "법제사법위원회", ~ (2005)
- 독일형법, "법무부", 법무부, ~ (2008)
- 법무연수원, "범죄백서" (2009), 법무연수원
- 범죄분석, "대검찰청", 대검찰청, ~ (2010)
- 보호감호처분의 재도입 및 보안처분제도의 형법편입, "김일수", 법무부, ~ (2010)
- 김일수, "사회보호법의 문제점과 개선방향", 형사정책연구, 14(3), pp.1~25 (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 독일 보안처분에 관한 연구. in: 외국의 보안처분제도에 관한 연구: 미국의수용치료사법처분 및 독일보안처분의 최신동향, "김혜정", 법무부, ~ (2007)
- 김혜정, "현행 보호감호제도에 관한 정책적 조명", 형사정책연구, 14(4), pp.145~180 (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 송문호, "상습범 및 누범의 대책에 대한 문제점", 형사법연구, (16) (2001), 한국형사법학회
- 보호감호 처분의 재도입 및 보안처분 제도의 형법편입(지정토론문), "신양균", 법무부, ~ (2010)
- 신양균, "보호감호의 도입필요성에 관한 검토", 동아대 법학연구소 초청세미나 (2010)
- 심희기, "현행 보호감호제도의 문제점과 개선방향- ‘한국형 보호감호’ 구상과 그 가정에 대한 비판적 검토-", 형사정책연구, 14(3), pp.2~50 (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 형법과 형사특별법의 법정형 정비방안, "이승현", 법무부, 12~ (2009)
- 이재석, "보호감호제도는 위헌인 악법인가", 대구법학, (6) (2003), 대구대 법학연구소
- 이정념, "대상자를 위한 친사회적인 보호감호의 도입 필요성 및 그 방향", 형사정책, 22(1), pp.319~344 (2010), 한국형사정책학회
- 상습누범자에 대한 사회치료처우의 필요성, "장규원", 동산손해목박사화갑기념논문집, ~ (1993)
- 최병각, "상습범의 법제와 개선방향", 비교형사법연구, 3(2) (2001), 한국비교형사법학회
- 한영수, "독일의 보호감호제도", 한독법학, (14) (2003), 한독법률학회
