본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영업비밀의 비밀관리성 요건

The Requirements of Secrecy and Management of Trade Secrets

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal protection system of trade secrets in Korea from a standpoint of secrecy and management, and show the guideline in comment and legislation. Trade secrets became the legal protective object in the early 1990s in Korea through the revision of the Unfair Competition Prevention Law by the external factor, that is, demand of international harmony on the system of intellectual property. In the consequence of this reason, the company and the nation are rarely concerned about the legal protection system of trade secrets, and lawsuit is changed. Economic espionage is increased and the company and the nation’s concerns and lawsuits on trade secrets are increased. As a result, the legal protection system of trade secret is fixed as necessary in Korea. In this essay first look at the existing argument for secrecy and management requirement in Trade secret law. In addition, it examine the secrecy and management guideline in Korea and guideline’s a point in drawback. The essay then examine critical discussion of existing argument ; a brief history of Trade secret law, new argument , the standard justifications and the potential benefits for the secrecy and management. The existing argument is no standard justifications and verification of potenial benefits. It might be able to deny the protection for trade secret law because the negative discussion is too critical. So, the standard justifications and potential benefits should be analyzed more carefully before any decision about the secrecy and management requirement is made. Also nature and level of trade secrecy and character and practice of industry should be analyzed more carefully. Then it should define the reasonable and effective secrecy and management of trade secret law.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal protection system of trade secrets in Korea from a standpoint of secrecy and management, and show the guideline in comment and legislation. Trade secrets became the legal protective object in the early 1990s in Korea through the revision of the Unfair Competition Prevention Law by the external factor, that is, demand of international harmony on the system of intellectual property. In the consequence of this reason, the company and the nation are rarely concerned about the legal protection system of trade secrets, and lawsuit is changed. Economic espionage is increased and the company and the nation’s concerns and lawsuits on trade secrets are increased. As a result, the legal protection system of trade secret is fixed as necessary in Korea. In this essay first look at the existing argument for secrecy and management requirement in Trade secret law. In addition, it examine the secrecy and management guideline in Korea and guideline’s a point in drawback. The essay then examine critical discussion of existing argument ; a brief history of Trade secret law, new argument , the standard justifications and the potential benefits for the secrecy and management. The existing argument is no standard justifications and verification of potenial benefits. It might be able to deny the protection for trade secret law because the negative discussion is too critical. So, the standard justifications and potential benefits should be analyzed more carefully before any decision about the secrecy and management requirement is made. Also nature and level of trade secrecy and character and practice of industry should be analyzed more carefully. Then it should define the reasonable and effective secrecy and management of trade secret law.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김국현, "영엉비밀보호법 실무" (2010), 세창출판사
  2. 특허청, "영업비밀보호 가이드북" (2009), 특허청
  3. 황의창, "부정경쟁방지법 및 영업비밀보호법 4정판" (2006), 세창출판사
  4. 강영수, "영업비밀의 민사적 보호에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1993
  5. 구회근, "실제 분쟁사례를 통해서 본 영업비밀의 보호에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2009
  6. 나종갑, "영업비밀유지의무와 전직금지기간", 상사판례연구, 22(4), pp.173~220 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
  7. 박광민, "부정경쟁방지법상 영업비밀 개념의 검토", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.413~436 (2006), 법학연구소
  8. 신승균, "기술정보의 비밀유지에 관한 판례검토", 법학논총, 25, pp.163~182 (2011), 법학연구소
  9. 이재철, "영업비밀의 법적 보호에 관한 연구:비밀관리성을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2000
  10. 정상조, "부정경쟁방지법상 종업원의 비밀유지의무", 法學, 36(1)통권 : 97 (1995), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  11. 정호열, "미국의 영업비밀 보호법리", 경쟁법연구, 5 (1994)
  12. 최호진, "기업의 영업비밀에 대한 형사법적 보호", 형사법연구, (25), pp.379~404 (2006), 한국형사법학회
  13. Vincent Chiappetta, "Myth, Chameleon, or Intellectual Property Olympian?: A Normative Framework Supporting Trade Secret Law", GEO.MASON L. REV, 8, pp.69~ (1999)
  14. Jerry Cohen, "Trade Secrets Protection and Exploitation" (2001), The Bureau of National of Affair, Inc
  15. MELVIN F. JAGER, "TRADE SECRETS LAW § 5:16–5:26", ~ (2008)
  16. "TRADE SECRECY, INNOVATION, AND THE REQUIREMENT OF REASONABLE SECRECY PRECAUTIONS"[URL]
  17. Rober G. Bone, "A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification", CALIF. L. REV, 86 (1998)
  18. William B. Barton, "A Study in the Law of Trade Secrets", U. CIN. L. REV, 13, pp.507~ (1939)
  19. 経済産業省, "営業秘密管理指針" (2005)
  20. 経済産業省知的財産政策室, "大事な情報を大切に保護する- 営業秘密管理" (2006)
  21. 小野昌延, "新·注解不正競争防止法" (2007), 新版下卷, 靑林書院
  22. 2007년 10월 15일자 보도자료 “법무부장관, 감찰에 기술유출법죄 엄단 및 관련 수사체계 강화 특별지시”, 윤휘종, 조은효, 무너지는 보안.. 기술유출 ‘심각’, "법무부", 법무부, ~ (2011)
  23. 임수정, "LG에어컨 기술유출 혐의 벤처기업 임원에 무죄" (2011), 연합뉴스

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)