본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영업비밀의 성립 및 침해요건에 관한 연구 – 우리나라 일본의 판례를 중심으로 –

A Study On Definition and Protection of Trade Secret

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

There are three factors required to be trade secret. namely, a trade secret is information that (1) is not generally known to the public (2) confers some sort of economic benefit on its holder (3) is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. If an employee uses the secret information of his company by a dishonest means or he violates his obligation to keep trade secret, he trespasses trade secret of his company. This article focuses on court's decision pattern on definition and infringement of trade secret. what is more, It deals with Japanese court's decision comparing with Korean court's decision.

Abstract

There are three factors required to be trade secret. namely, a trade secret is information that (1) is not generally known to the public (2) confers some sort of economic benefit on its holder (3) is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. If an employee uses the secret information of his company by a dishonest means or he violates his obligation to keep trade secret, he trespasses trade secret of his company. This article focuses on court's decision pattern on definition and infringement of trade secret. what is more, It deals with Japanese court's decision comparing with Korean court's decision.

참고문헌 (6)

  1. 황의창, "부정경쟁방지 및 영업비밀보호법" (2011), 세창출판사
  2. "부정경쟁방지법", 사법연수원, ~ (2007)
  3. 小野昌延, "新注解 不正競爭防止法" (2007), 靑林書院
  4. 牧野利秋, "知的財産法의 理論과 實務" (2007), 新日本法規
  5. 經濟産業省知的財産政策室, "逐條解說 不正競爭防止法(上,下)" (2007), 有斐閣
  6. 澁谷達記, "知的財産法講義 III" (2005), 有斐閣

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)