본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사전지시에 의한 연명치료의 중단에 관한 연구

A Study on the Withholding or Withdrawal of Life-Prolonging Treatment by Advance Directive for Health Care

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In 2009, the Korea Supreme Court held that discontinuance of life-extending treatment can be allowed, upon reaching the stage of irrecoverable death, on the ground of the patient’s right to self decision to die based on dignity, value and the right to pursuit of happiness as a human being. The Court noted following requisites of the withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment by advanced directive for health care. First, the patient should be in the terminal condition, that will result in imminent death or has an irreversible injury or illness that results in a persistent vegetative state or permanent unconsciousness. Second, there should be patient’s advanced directive for withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment on his or her terminal condition. Third, provided medical information directly from medical provider or physician, the competent patient should execute the advance directive soberly as to the specific medical treatment based on the medical information and his own values. Fourth, The advance directive should be executed to the patient’s medical provider or patient’s attending physician and it’s existence should be clearly proved by written instructions or medical records. And last, unless the patient files a lawsuit directly in court, it is desirable that a committee composed of expert doctors, etc. decides whether the patient has reached the irrecoverable death stage. This paper notes that the third requisite of the Court for withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment may be the obstacle to be executed a valid advance directive by patient. Since, generally, prior to the patient’s terminal and irreversible condition, sufficient medical information of the patient’s irreversible injury or illness, is not provided to patient/declarant executing advance directive. This paper argues that the requisite may be fitted to the advance directive for medical treatment irrelevant to patient’s terminal condition. This paper also examines, the amended Korean Civil Code Article 947-2(effective on July.1.2013) that provides the adult guardian’s power of decision regarding personal affairs of the incompetent adult, the amended Code of Article 959-14 that provides the durable power of attorney by contract between principal and agent. The power of attorney created by principal will take effective when the principal loses capacity to decide his or her personal affairs. According to the Art. 947-2 or 959-14, this paper admits the possibility, a principal giving advance directive for health care to withhold or withdraw life-prolonging treatment. But, there is no provision immunizing criminal, civil, or professional liability of physicians or the agents who participated in advance directive regarding life-sustaining treatment. So, this paper insists to establish an Act that permits individuals to execute advance directive for health care.

Abstract

In 2009, the Korea Supreme Court held that discontinuance of life-extending treatment can be allowed, upon reaching the stage of irrecoverable death, on the ground of the patient’s right to self decision to die based on dignity, value and the right to pursuit of happiness as a human being. The Court noted following requisites of the withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment by advanced directive for health care. First, the patient should be in the terminal condition, that will result in imminent death or has an irreversible injury or illness that results in a persistent vegetative state or permanent unconsciousness. Second, there should be patient’s advanced directive for withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment on his or her terminal condition. Third, provided medical information directly from medical provider or physician, the competent patient should execute the advance directive soberly as to the specific medical treatment based on the medical information and his own values. Fourth, The advance directive should be executed to the patient’s medical provider or patient’s attending physician and it’s existence should be clearly proved by written instructions or medical records. And last, unless the patient files a lawsuit directly in court, it is desirable that a committee composed of expert doctors, etc. decides whether the patient has reached the irrecoverable death stage. This paper notes that the third requisite of the Court for withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment may be the obstacle to be executed a valid advance directive by patient. Since, generally, prior to the patient’s terminal and irreversible condition, sufficient medical information of the patient’s irreversible injury or illness, is not provided to patient/declarant executing advance directive. This paper argues that the requisite may be fitted to the advance directive for medical treatment irrelevant to patient’s terminal condition. This paper also examines, the amended Korean Civil Code Article 947-2(effective on July.1.2013) that provides the adult guardian’s power of decision regarding personal affairs of the incompetent adult, the amended Code of Article 959-14 that provides the durable power of attorney by contract between principal and agent. The power of attorney created by principal will take effective when the principal loses capacity to decide his or her personal affairs. According to the Art. 947-2 or 959-14, this paper admits the possibility, a principal giving advance directive for health care to withhold or withdraw life-prolonging treatment. But, there is no provision immunizing criminal, civil, or professional liability of physicians or the agents who participated in advance directive regarding life-sustaining treatment. So, this paper insists to establish an Act that permits individuals to execute advance directive for health care.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 권혁남, "연명치료중단에 관한 사례비교 및 존엄사의 정당화 가능성 연구 - 故 김수환 추기경과 故 김대중 전 대통령의 사례를 중심으로 -", 생명윤리, 11(1), pp.33~49 (2010), 한국생명윤리학회
  2. 김계순, "연명치료중단에 대한 의료인의 민사적 책임", 민주법학, (38), pp.137~162 (2008), 민주주의법학연구회
  3. 김천수, "成年後見과 醫療行爲의 決定", 가족법연구, 21(1), pp.1~30 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  4. 김천수, "의료행위에 대한 동의능력과 동의권자", 민사법학, (13) (1996), 한국민사법학회
  5. 김혁돈, "존엄사 입법화에 대한 비교법적 제안", 법학논총, 33(2), pp.581~608 (2009), 법학연구소
  6. 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  7. 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.31~74 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  8. 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제도에 있어서 신상보호 ―신상결정의 대행과 그 한계―", 가족법연구, 25(2), pp.147~198 (2011), 한국가족법학회
  9. 박호균, "성년후견과 의료-개정 민법 제947조의 2를 중심으로-", 의료법학, 13(1), pp.125~153 (2012), 대한의료법학회[DOI]
  10. 석희태, "연명의료의 중단 - 대법원 2009.5.21. 선고 2009다17417 판결과 관련하여", 의료법학, 10(1), pp.263~305 (2009), 대한의료법학회
  11. 송호열, "성년후견법제의 도입에 따른 의료행위와 동의권", 의생명과학과 법, 7 (2012)
  12. 오세혁, "사전의료지시의 한계", 의료법학, 11(2), pp.239~274 (2011), 대한의료법학회
  13. 오호철, "일본의 성년후견제도상 의료행위의 동의", 법학연구, (39), pp.85~108 (2010), 한국법학회
  14. 이은영, "연명치료 중단의 입법화 방안에 관한 연구 - 성년후견제도의 도입과 관련하여-", 의료법학, 10(2), pp.203~249 (2009), 대한의료법학회
  15. 이인영, "주요국가의 존엄사법 분석과 평가", 입법학 연구, 6 (2009)
  16. 이재석, "존엄사에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, (37), pp.171~195 (2010), 한국법학회
  17. 이희훈, "연명치료중단에 대한 헌법적 고찰", 한림법학, 20 (2009)
  18. 장석천, "개정민법에 있어서 성년후견과 의료행위 동의권", 재산법연구, 28(3), pp.1~22 (2011), 한국재산법학회
  19. 전지연, "연명치료의 중단에 대한 형사법적 검토", 연세의료ㆍ과학기술과 법, 2(2) (2011)
  20. 정진연, "연명치료중단에 관한 형법적 고찰", 법학연구, (36), pp.263~287 (2009), 한국법학회
  21. 정철, "연명치료중단 판결의 헌법적 검토 -대법원 2009. 5. 21. 선고 2009다17417판결-", 서울대학교 법학, 50(4), pp.111~140 (2009), 법학연구소
  22. 현소혜, "의료행위 동의권자의 결정 - 성년후견제 시행에 대비하여 -", 홍익법학, 13(2), pp.177~213 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  23. 홍완식, "존엄사 법안의 분석과 평가", 입법학연구, 6 (2009)
  24. Begley & Barrett, "Representing the Elderly or Disabled Client, Current Through 2012, Copyright (c) 2012 Thomson", RIA., Rep. Elderly & Disabled Client ¶ 14.01, pp.1~
  25. Catherine J. Jones, "American Jurisprudence Trials", AMJUR TRIALS, 63, pp.1~ (2012)
  26. Joan M. Krauskopf, "Elderlaw: Advocacy for the Aging, Database updated November 2012, 1 Elderlaw Advoc. Aging § 8:18 (2d ed.)", Westlaw Database
  27. Kathy D. Underwood, "Louisiana Notary Handbook, La. Prac. La. Notary Handbook § 8:18" (2011), Westlaw Database
  28. Richard A. Leiter, "STATE STATUTORY SURVEYS, Right to Die: Durable Power of Attorney, Euthanasia" (2007), Living Wills
  29. Thomson Reuters, "50 STATE STATUTORY SURVEYS, TRUSTS AND ESTATES, ESTATE PLANNING, Living Wills, 0160 SURVEYS 4", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)