연명치료중단의 허용기준에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Permitted Standards of ‘Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment’
1
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Supreme Court of Korea presented the standard of 'withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment' on May 21st, 2009, for the first time. This decision explained the concept of withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment clearly. This paper try to seek proper standard on withdrawal of Life-sustaining by analysing the standard on withdrawal of Life-sustaining,judicial circles and medical circles suggested. Supreme Court of Korea presented some standards. The first, patient must be irreversible and incurable. Second, they must have the right of exercising on self-determination by Advance Medical Directive. Last, in the absences of patient's presumptive intention. Doctors have to respect decision of Hospital ethics committee on withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment. The later discussion and a bill on withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment were not different from the decision of Supreme Court of Korea. Therefore, this paper will suggest common problems about the standard on withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment, Supreme Court of Korea, judical circles and medical circles presented. The first, these conditions must be judge by strict criteria. Second,the legalization of the Advance Directive need to be considered carefully,because it can be misuse. Third, not only patient's right of life but death with dignity has to be respected. Therefore, it is necessary to make the law about criteria and process of withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment through social consensus as soon as possible.
Abstract
Supreme Court of Korea presented the standard of 'withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment' on May 21st, 2009, for the first time. This decision explained the concept of withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment clearly. This paper try to seek proper standard on withdrawal of Life-sustaining by analysing the standard on withdrawal of Life-sustaining,judicial circles and medical circles suggested. Supreme Court of Korea presented some standards. The first, patient must be irreversible and incurable. Second, they must have the right of exercising on self-determination by Advance Medical Directive. Last, in the absences of patient's presumptive intention. Doctors have to respect decision of Hospital ethics committee on withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment. The later discussion and a bill on withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment were not different from the decision of Supreme Court of Korea. Therefore, this paper will suggest common problems about the standard on withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment, Supreme Court of Korea, judical circles and medical circles presented. The first, these conditions must be judge by strict criteria. Second,the legalization of the Advance Directive need to be considered carefully,because it can be misuse. Third, not only patient's right of life but death with dignity has to be respected. Therefore, it is necessary to make the law about criteria and process of withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment through social consensus as soon as possible.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김성룡, "연명치료중단의 기준에 관한 법적 논의의 쟁점과 과제", 형사법연구, 22(1), pp.23~44 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 이인영, "생명의 시작과 죽음 : 윤리논쟁과 법의식" (2009), 삼우사
- 김용욱, "형법상 생명보호원칙과 치료중단", 의료법학, 3(1), pp.28~ (2002)
- 홍완식, "존엄사 법안의 분석과 평가 - 입법학적 관점-", 국회입법조사처 토론회 자료집, (2009)
- 정성근, "형법총론" (2008), 삼지원
- 김일수, "한국형법Ⅰ" (1992), 박영사
- 정진연, "연명치료중단에 관한 형법적 고찰", 법학연구, (36), pp.263~287 (2009), 한국법학회
- 허일태, "존엄사에 대한 연구", 형사정책연구, 4(4), pp.78~ (1993)
- 김기춘, "형법개정시론", pp.149~ (1984), 삼영사
- 정현미, "치료중단의 한계와 형사책임", 형사정책연구, 15(4), pp.165~202 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김학태, "무의미한 생명연장치료 중단에 관한 법 윤리적 고찰 - 법원의 존엄사 판결에 대한 비판적 성찰 -", 외법논집, 33(1), pp.311~338 (2009), 법학연구소
- 박형욱, "세브란스병원 사건의 경과와 의의", 대한의사협회지, 52(9), pp.848~855 (2009), 대한의사협회
- 이세화, "무의미한 연명치료의 중단에 관한 소고", 영남법학, (29), pp.275~310 (2009), 법학연구소
- 이석배, "연명치료중단의 기준과 절차 - 대법원 2009. 5. 21. 선고 2009다17417 판결이 가지는 문제점을 중심으로 -", 형사법연구, 21(2), pp.147~170 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 허대석, "무의미한 치료의 중단", 대한의사협회지, 44(9) (2009), 대한의사협회
- 이미애, "연명치료 중단결정과정에서 환자의 자기결정권이 차지하는 위치", 교수논집, (20), pp.163~164 (2004), 한세대학교
- 김경화, "자의퇴원으로 인한 치료중단과 안락사", 형사법연구, (17), pp.43~68 (2002), 한국형사법학회
- 장승일, "치료중단과 의사의 형사책임에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, (29), pp.201~220 (2008), 한국법학회
- 전지연, "안락사에 대한 형법적 고찰", 한림법학 FORUM, 4 (1995), 한림대학교 법학연구소
- "한국보건의료연구원, 보도자료", ~ (2009)
- 보건복지부(생명윤리안전과), "연명치료중단 제도화 관련 사회적 협의체 논의결과 발표, 보도자료", ~ (2010)
- 신현호, "존엄사의 올바른 법제화를 위한 토론회, 토론문", pp.9~ (2009), 국회입법 조사처
