전자의무기록 변개(變改)에 대한 형사책임과 대응방안
Criminal Responsibility and Response Related to False Electronic Medical Record
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discussed criminal responsibility and response related to false electronic medical record. The result of the study is as follows. medical records are documents that record the state of the patients and result of treatment and cannot be seen as a proof. Therefore, it does not constitute the act of false diagnosis, or forgery or modification of private document under criminal law, because forgery or modification under criminal law can be only committed by a person unauthorized to make such documents. It cannot be punished by the Medical Law Article 22 as well. In this provision, 'in detail' means filling out the medical record insufficiently. False statement is different from inadequate statement. Therefore, according to the principle of legality, it does not apply to the Medical Law Article 22. In conclusion, there is no legal basis by which false electronic medical record can be punished. For that reason, the Medical Law must be revised to create relevant penalties. To investigate false electronic medical records, digital forensic technology must be used. In this study, the following was suggested as a legal system to use digital forensic. Electronic medical record needs to be standardized and a new provision be created regarding the obligation to store and discard log records. Also, a national management system must be established for electronic medical records and digital forensic training be provided to nurture experts. By doing so, we can prevent false electronic medical records and use digital forensic in investigation.
Abstract
This paper discussed criminal responsibility and response related to false electronic medical record. The result of the study is as follows. medical records are documents that record the state of the patients and result of treatment and cannot be seen as a proof. Therefore, it does not constitute the act of false diagnosis, or forgery or modification of private document under criminal law, because forgery or modification under criminal law can be only committed by a person unauthorized to make such documents. It cannot be punished by the Medical Law Article 22 as well. In this provision, 'in detail' means filling out the medical record insufficiently. False statement is different from inadequate statement. Therefore, according to the principle of legality, it does not apply to the Medical Law Article 22. In conclusion, there is no legal basis by which false electronic medical record can be punished. For that reason, the Medical Law must be revised to create relevant penalties. To investigate false electronic medical records, digital forensic technology must be used. In this study, the following was suggested as a legal system to use digital forensic. Electronic medical record needs to be standardized and a new provision be created regarding the obligation to store and discard log records. Also, a national management system must be established for electronic medical records and digital forensic training be provided to nurture experts. By doing so, we can prevent false electronic medical records and use digital forensic in investigation.
참고문헌 (24)
- 곽병선, "디지털 증거의 압수·수색절차상 문제점과 개선방안", 법학연구, (51), pp.249~265 (2013), 한국법학회
- 강동욱, "디지털증거 수집에 관한 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 검토", 법학연구, 18(3), pp.161~188 (2010), 법학연구소
- 권양섭, "디지털 포렌식 법률체계 구축 방안", 법학연구, (35), pp.357~382 (2009), 한국법학회
- 김대석, "의료과오소송에 있어서 입증방해", 법학논총, 14(2) (2007), 조선대학교 법학연구소
- 金命燁, "醫療過誤訴訟에 있어서 立證妨害에 관한 小考", 저스티스, 75 (2003), 한국법학원
- 김용영, "신뢰할 수 있는 전자의무기록에 관한 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 10(2), pp.193~200 (2012), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- 전자적 증거의 실효적인 압수·수색 증거조사 방안연구, "노명선", 대검찰청, ~ (2007)
- 류화신, "전자의무기록의 운용 및 그에 대한 민·형사상 문제점", 선진상사법률연구, (32), pp.31~54 (2005), 법무부
- 박재현, "의료분쟁상의 디지털 포렌식 적용 방안 연구 : 의무(진료)기록 중심으로", 석사, 정보보호학과, pp.2012
- 박태신, "진료기록부 등의 중요성에 관한 연구", 홍익법학, 8(1), pp.121~142 (2007), 법학연구소
- 백경희, "진료기록의 편중성과 진료기록 기재의무 위반에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 20(1), pp.249~274 (2013), 법학연구원
- 설민수, "문서훼손을 통한 입증방해 행위와 그 제재", 인권과 정의, (416), pp.29~51 (2011), 대한변호사협회
- 손흥수, "진료기록 개작, 부실기재 등과 의료과오소송: 진료기록 개작 등에 대한 독립한 손해배상책임 인정에 관한 논의를 포함하여", 사법논집, 53 (2011), 법원도서관
- 이백휴, "환자의 의무기록 관련 의료인의 법적 지위", 의료법학, 11(2), pp.309~335 (2011), 대한의료법학회
- 이인영, "전자기록에 관한 법적 문제", 법학논총, 28(1) (2011), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- 이호용, "전자의무기록의 보관과 신뢰할 수 있는 제3의 기관의 활용", 한양법학, 24(4), pp.123~150 (2013), 한양법학회
- 오기두, "전자정보의 수색ㆍ검증, 압수에 관한 개정 형사소송법의 함의", 형사소송 이론과 실무, 4(1) (2012), 한국형사소송법학회
- 오길영, "디지털 검증의 현재와 그 부당성 — 소위 ‘왕재산’ 사건을 대상으로 —", 민주법학, (48), pp.159~195 (2012), 민주주의법학연구회
- 정무원, "진료기록변조와 의료소송", 법률신문 제2757호, ~ (1999)
- 주한규, "전자의무기록 변경 방지 프로토콜", 디지털컨텐츠학회논문지, 11(2), pp.135~144 (2010), 한국디지털콘텐츠학회
- 황만성, "진료기록부 부실기재행위등의 형사책임", 형사정책연구소식, (84) (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 황만성, "전자의무기록의 보관방법에 관한 고찰", 의생명과학과법, 10 (2013), 원광대학교 법학연구소
- 황만성, "허위진단서작성과 진료기록 허위기재의 법적 문제", 법학논총, 28(1), pp.5~33 (2011), 법학연구소
- 김진우, "Digital Evidence in the US Courtroom", 과학수사학회지, 5(3), pp.228~236 (2011), 한국과학수사학회