허위진단서작성과 진료기록 허위기재의 법적 문제
The Legal Problems on the Crime of Issuance of Falsified Medical Certificates and the False Writing of Medical Examination Record
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Medical certificate, post-mortem examination or certificate guarantee its authenticity of the content through the article 233 of the criminal act. The article 233 of the Criminal Act(the crime of issuance of falsified medical certificates) states that if a medical or herb doctor, dentist or midwife prepares false medical certificate, post-mortem examination or certificate life or death, one shall be punished by imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than three years, suspension of qualifications for not more than seven years, or a fine not exceeding thirty million won. To constitute the crime of issuance of falsified medical certificates, it is necessary for the contents of the certificate to be substantially contrary to the truth, as well as it is needed the subjective perception that the contents of the certificate are false. On the other hand, the failure of correct and detailed writing on the medical examination record is subject to criminal conviction due to the breach of the article 22 (1) of the medical act. On the article 22 (1) of the medical act, whether the false writing on the medical examination record shall be punished or not is vague. The Supreme Court Decision 2004DO3360 Delivered on March 23, 2006 declared that although the accused did not MRI scan, etc. for precise observation about the disability status of patient, it was difficult to believe that the contents of the Disability Certificate of this case were contrary to the objective truth or the defendant had perception that the contents of the certificate were false. It should be distinguished between the need of punishment and being punished by the existing law. The principle “nulla poena nullum crimen cine lege” is the basic principle of the Constitution law and the Criminal Act, so it is strictly observed.
Abstract
Medical certificate, post-mortem examination or certificate guarantee its authenticity of the content through the article 233 of the criminal act. The article 233 of the Criminal Act(the crime of issuance of falsified medical certificates) states that if a medical or herb doctor, dentist or midwife prepares false medical certificate, post-mortem examination or certificate life or death, one shall be punished by imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than three years, suspension of qualifications for not more than seven years, or a fine not exceeding thirty million won. To constitute the crime of issuance of falsified medical certificates, it is necessary for the contents of the certificate to be substantially contrary to the truth, as well as it is needed the subjective perception that the contents of the certificate are false. On the other hand, the failure of correct and detailed writing on the medical examination record is subject to criminal conviction due to the breach of the article 22 (1) of the medical act. On the article 22 (1) of the medical act, whether the false writing on the medical examination record shall be punished or not is vague. The Supreme Court Decision 2004DO3360 Delivered on March 23, 2006 declared that although the accused did not MRI scan, etc. for precise observation about the disability status of patient, it was difficult to believe that the contents of the Disability Certificate of this case were contrary to the objective truth or the defendant had perception that the contents of the certificate were false. It should be distinguished between the need of punishment and being punished by the existing law. The principle “nulla poena nullum crimen cine lege” is the basic principle of the Constitution law and the Criminal Act, so it is strictly observed.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김성천, "형법총론"
- 김일수, "형법각론"
- 김일수, "형법총론"
- 대한의사협회, "진단서 작성지침", 대한의사협회
- 박상기, "형법총론"
- 배종대, "형법각론"
- 배종대, "형법총론"
- 손동권, "형법총론"
- 신동운, "형법총론"
- 오영근, "형법총론"
- 오영근, "형법각론"
- 이영란, "형법학각론강의"
- 이윤성, "사망진단서 이렇게 쓴다" (2003), 퍼시픽출판사
- 이재상, "형법총론"
- 임웅, "형법각론"
- 임웅, "형법총론"
- 권광중, "의료소송의 절차상의 제문제", 법원행정처
- 김영태, "허위진단서작성1) 죄의 구성요건 등에 대한 고찰 - 대법원 2006.3.23. 선고 2004도3360호 판결을 중심으로", 의료법학, 10(2), pp.115~150 (2009), 대한의료법학회
- 김태명, "비신분자에 의한 허위공문서작성죄의 간접정범", 형사판례연구, (13)
- 민유숙, "허위진단서작성죄와 허위공문서작성죄의 관계", 대법원판례해설, ~ (2004)
- 박경춘, "의료인의 진료기록부 등 허위작성시 형사처벌 가부", 의료법학, 8(1) (2007), 의료법학
- 박영호, "의료소송과 입증방해" (2000), 형평과 정의
- 박인섭, "입증방해에 관한 연구-의료사고소송을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1997
- 손용근, "의료과오소송에 있어서의 입증경감에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1996
- 심희기, "조선시대 살옥에 관한 연구(1)", 법학연구, 25(1) (1982), 부산대 법학연구소
- 이정원, "공정증서원본 등 부실기재죄의 허와 실", 형사법연구, (25), pp.267~286 (2006), 한국형사법학회
- 이정원, "허위공문서작성죄의 제문제, 한국 형사법학의 새로운 지평, In (오선주교수 정년기념논문집)" (2001)
- 정규원, "의료정보의 활용 및 보호", 정보법학, 6(1) (2002)
- 조준현, "허위공문서작성죄의 정범표지와 공범관여자의 책임”, 형사판례의 연구; 지송 이재상교수 화갑기념논문집"
- 추호경, "허위진단서작성죄에 대한 해석론적 고찰", 法曹, 52(1)통권 : 556
- 황만성, "진료기록부 부실기재 등의 법적 평가", 의료법학, 4(1) (2003)
