论对赌协议的规制路径转变
On the regulatory path transformation of Valuation Adjustment Mechanism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
对赌协议作为重要的私募融资手段被实践广泛采纳，中国对待对赌协议的态度也从原来的绝对禁止向现阶段的条件化接受转变。以《全国法院民商事审判工作会议纪要》的发布为转折，法院对于对赌协议的审理采取协议效力与协议可履行性分别判断的区隔论。然而区隔论只是具备形式上的促成合同效力判断的逻辑性和体系性，对解决对赌协议问题并无裨益。在资本维持原则的限制与调整下，应当适当调整对赌协议的审理要件，从区隔化的判断上回归到非区隔化的形式与实质的统一。同时，根据具体情况审理协议履行的可能性，在利益平衡的基础上妥善处理对赌协议。
Abstract
The valuation adjustment mechanism has been widely adopted in judicial practice as an important means of private placement. China's attitude towards the valuation adjustment mechanism contract has turned from the absolute prohibition into conditional acceptance. The promulgation of "the 9th conference minutes" acted as a turning point. From then on, the court begins to adopt the doctrine of separation which takes the validity and the performance of the contract respectively. However，the doctrine just meets with the formal logic and systematism of the judgment of contract validity, and does no help to solve the problem of the valuation adjustment mechanism. Under the restriction and adjustment of the principle of capital maintenance, the trial of prerequisite of the court should return to the indistinction doctrine while hearing the cases regarding valuation adjustment mechanism contracts in order to achieve the unity of form and substance. At the same time, trials should turn to the judgment of the performance possibility of the contract and handle the valuation adjustment mechanism contract properly based on the balance of interests.
참고문헌 (26)
- 傅穹, "对赌协议的法律构造与定性观察", 政法论丛 (2011)
- 谢海霞, "金融创新与司法裁判:以我国‘对赌协议’的案例、学说、实践为样本", 南京师大学报(社会科学版) (2013)
- 杨明宇, "私募股权投资中对赌协议性质与合法性探析——兼评海富投资案", 证券市场导报 (2014)
- 傅穹, "对赌协议的法律构造与定性观察", 政法论丛 (2011)
- 彭冰, "对赌协议’第一案分析", 北京仲裁 (2012)
- 周游, "对赌协议纠纷处理中‘履行可能性’问题之省思", 证券法苑, 28(01) (2020)
- 赵旭东, "第三种投资：对赌协议的立法回应与制度创新", 东方法学 (2014)
- 赵旭东, "第三种投资：对赌协议的立法回应与制度创新", 东方法学 (2014)
- 贺剑, "对赌协议何以履行不能?——一个公司法与民法的交叉研究", 法学家 (2021)
- 王延川, "规范对赌协议不宜‘削足适履’", 证券法苑, 28(01) (2020)
- 贺剑, "对赌协议何以履行不能?——一个公司法与民法的交叉研究", 法学家 (2021)
- 贺剑, "对赌协议何以履行不能?——一个公司法与民法的交叉研究", 法学家 (2021)
- 张保华, "资本维持原则解析——以“维持”的误读与澄清为视角", 法治研究 (2012)
- 赵万一, "资本三原则的功能更新与价值定位", 法学评论, 35(01) (2017)
- 冯果, "慎重对待‘资本维持原则’的存废", 中国法律评论 (2020)
- 周翔, "我国资本制度改革中资本维持原则的修正", 甘肃社会科学 (2016)
- 刘燕, "‘对赌协议’的裁判路径及政策选择——基于PE", VC与公司对赌场景的分析, 2020, pp.42(02), ~
- 王保树, "‘资本维持原则’的发展趋势", 法商研究 (2004)
- 贺剑, "对赌协议何以履行不能?——一个公司法与民法的交叉研究", 法学家 (2021)
- 周翔, "我国资本制度改革中资本维持原则的修正", 甘肃社会科学 (2016)
- 梁上上, "论股东强制盈余分配请求权——兼评‘河南思维自动化设备有限公司与胡克盈余分配纠纷案’", 现代法学, 37(02) (2015)
- 潘林, "对赌协议第一案’的法律经济学分析", 法制与社会发展, 20(04) (2014)
- 贺剑, "对赌协议何以履行不能?——一个公司法与民法的交叉研究", 法学家 (2021)
- 刘燕, "对赌协议与公司法资本管制：美国实践及其启示", 环球法律评论, 38(03) (2016)
- 刘燕, "对赌协议与公司法资本管制：美国实践及其启示", 环球法律评论, 38(03) (2016)
- 赵旭东, "第三种投资：对赌协议的立法回应与制度创新", 东方法学 (2014)