본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

论股权让与担保效力认定的 存在问题及完善

On the Existing Problems and Improvement of the Confirmation of the Validity of Equity Transfer Guarantee

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

股权让与担保作为一种非典型的新型融资担保方式,既没有法律规定也没有理论界的统一定论,却在民间借贷领域逐渐发展壮大。面对相关争议问题,由于司法领域没有统一的裁判标准,司法者或者避而不谈,或者各自自由心证,导致司法实践中各个法院出现同案不同判的乱象,甚至同一法院针对股权让与担保的判决也各 不相同。因此,探讨股权让与担保的效力认定的合法性与合理性实有必要。本文在探讨股权让与担保的属性之后,将股权让与担保与相关制度进行分析比较,类推适用某些制度的优先,并结合公司人合性、封闭性、严格的程序性的特点区分股权让与担保的对内效力和对外效力。在分析股权让与担保在法律适用中尤其是公司法和破产法的适用中存在的问题后,本文旨在通过有限度地承认物权法定缓和的基础上认可股权让与担保的合法性,呼吁司法者出台相关司法解释来引导股权让与担保制度的完善和发展,平衡债权人和债务人利益,促进经济的健康有序发展。

Abstract

Equity transfer guarantee is a new atypical financing guarantee model that hasbeen developing well in the private lending field without laws and conclusion of thetheoretical circle. When faced with relevant controversial issues, the judges avoided totalk about it or follow their hearts because there is no uniform standard of judgment. This leads to confusion in judicial practice, even the same court’s judges of theEquity transfer guarantee are different. Facing the varies judgments, it is essential todiscussing the legitimacy and rationality of the Equity transfer guarantee. Comparedthe Equity transfer guarantee with the relevant systems after studying the nature ofthe Equity transfer guarantee, we could learn the advantages of other systems andcombine with the Company’s characters which are harmonious among shareholders,closure and strict procedural to distinguish the internal and external effectiveness ofthe Equity transfer guarantee. After analyzing the problem of the Equity transferguarantee in application of law especially the Company law and the Bankruptcy law,We could reference The Principle of Legal Mitigation of Real Right to argument thelegitimacy of the Equity transfer guarantee and appeal the judicial person toenactment the relevant judicial interpretation, which could guide the development ofthe Equity transfer guarantee, balance the benefits of creditors and debtors andpromote sound and orderly economic development.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 葛林枫, "流质条款的司法现状分析", 硕士, pp.2017
  2. 高圣平, "中国担保物权制度的发展与非典型担保的命", 中国人民大学学报, 5 (2015)
  3. 高圣平, "股权让与担保效力的解释论—基于裁判的分析与展开", 人民司法, 28 (2018)
  4. 高治, "代物清偿预约研究—兼论流担保制度的立法选择", 法律适用, 8 (2008)
  5. 郭媛, "论让与担保", 硕士, pp.2017
  6. 杜珊珊, "论让与担保的效力", 硕士, pp.2016
  7. 梁慧星, "物权法" (2007), 北京法律出版社
  8. 刘龙, "本案股权让与担保合同应认定有效", 人民司法, 16 (2014)
  9. 刘晓纯, "孙文琪.基于生效判决视角的股权让与担保核心问题研究", 大学学报, 7 (2017)
  10. 李星, "中国有限责任公司股权让与担保效力认定问题研究", 硕士, pp.2018
  11. 李慧, "让与担保性质与效力认定", 硕士, pp.2015
  12. 李红梅, "中国让与担保实务问题研究", 硕士, pp.2015
  13. 马亚丽, "让与担保制度研究", 硕士, pp.2017
  14. 万龙, "股权让与担保三例纠纷案评析", 硕士, pp.2018
  15. 潘红光, "让与担保效力纠纷的类案分析", 硕士, pp.2015
  16. 付晨, "代物清偿法律问题研究", 硕士, pp.2018
  17. 杨立新, "让与担保的权利受让人对受让权利支配的限制", 中国应用法学, 4 (2018)
  18. 倪新维, "代持股协议下有限公司隐名投资者的权利探究", 硕士, pp.2015
  19. 吴菲菲, "让与担保制度研究", 硕士, pp.2017
  20. 王闯, "关于让与担保的司法态度及实务问题之解决", 人民司法, 16 (2014)
  21. 袁倩倩, "论物权法定原则之缓和", 现代商贸工业,, 22 (2018)
  22. 尹航, "有限责任公司股权转让效力研究—以利益衡量为视角的分析", 博士, pp.2016
  23. 蒋大兴, "破产程序中的“股转债”—合同法、公司法及破产法的“一揽子竞争", 当代法学, 6 (2015)
  24. 张鹏珍, "让与担保的效力研究", 硕士, pp.2017
  25. 张志坡, "物权法定缓和的可能性及其边界", 比较法研究, 1 (2017)
  26. 张志红, "股权转让中股东配偶的权利保障研究", 硕士, pp.2011
  27. 陈亮, "论物权法定缓和的正当性", 经济研究导论, 9 (2015)
  28. 陈红, "论让与担保", 硕士, pp.2005
  29. 蔡立东, "股权让与担保纠纷裁判逻辑的实证研究", 中国法学, 6 (2018)
  30. 胡鸿高, "论股权质押制度—以有限公司股权质权为中心", 上海社会科学界联合会. 2008年度上海市社会科学界第六届学术年会文集 (2008), 上海人民出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)