韩国古典诗话论中华诗人优劣

Abstract

The emergence of Korean classical poetry is influenced by Chinese poetry, so it inherits and develops Chinese poetry in the way of criticism and aesthetic taste, which is the witness of the cultural blending between China and Korea. Further study of Korean classical poetry is of great importance to the promotion of classical studies in China and Korea. This article examines the reception and development of the criticism in Korean classical poetry. This paper is divided into three parts.First of all, inheritance and application of criticisms in Korean poetry is discussed. There are two main forms of expression: making good or bad judgement and not judging good or bad. The former can be subdivided into the same topic, homology, epigrams, homographs, imitation poetry and mutual advantages and disadvantages and other forms.The latter can be divided into two types: contemporary poets, no matter how good or bad. There is also a kind of theory named YA JUAN, which is a derivative form of criticism of the good and the bad, forming a set of customary terms.Secondly, We will learn the characteristics of Korean poetry criticism from their criticism of Chinese poets. Korean poetry is very skilled in the use of criticism of the good and the bad, and it has become an important means of criticism in many critics. Thirdly，Discussion on the functions of the pros and cons in Korean poetry. Through the evaluation of Chinese poets, set up the standard of criticism for Korean poetry. Then, The good and bad criticism is transplanted into the Korean native Chinese poetry criticism to guide the direction of poetics development he way of parallel similarity between Chinese and Korean poets.