“Мне нечего делать.” ― 어떻게 볼 것인가?
On the Construction Type “Мне нечего делать.”
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
I examined seven hypotheses on the construction type "Мне нечего делать," which I would call NÉ-K construction. It turned out that each hypothesis focuses only on some specific stage(s) of the derivation (or evolution) of NÉ-K construction. NÉ-K construction, i.e., DAT―NÉ-K―BE―INF, has as its deep structure a complex S with main negative existential clause and subordinate infinitival clause. Each clause is provided with its own DAT discourse topic. Discourse topic of subordinate clause may be either PRO or K. Мне нечего делать. мнеi [neg [∃ [PROi [делать что]]]] Мне некому работать. мне [neg [∃ [кому [работать]]]] The above complex structure gradually transforms (or evolves) into a simple S with a single DAT discourse topic. Major rules applied for the full derivation of NÉ-K construction are as follows: PROi deletion, movement of interrogative K to the leftmost position, shift of K from interrogative to indefinite pronoun, GEN NEG rule, elimination of consonant clusters in front of K, incorporation of NE and K, addition of Ø to NE-K, metathesis of BE and K, and encliticization of BE. Peripheral constructions such as NE―BE―K or BE―NÉ-K found in colloquial Russian, and topicalized variants such as INF―BE―NÉ-K or NÉ-K―DAT―BE―INF can be derived from the same deep structure with the same rules but with slight modification or non-application of some rules. ЕСТЬ К construction can also be derived from the same deep structure with, of course, only the omission of NEG. During the course of derivation/evolution all elements of the construction suffer functional changes as follows; DAT: discourse topic of main clause within complex S > discourse topic of simple S K: interrogative ( > relative ) > indefinite pronoun > integration with NÉ- BE: existential > copula > enclitic, tense marker INF: predicate in subordinate clause > compliment of K > compliment (or less likely, subject) of NÉ-K.
Abstract
I examined seven hypotheses on the construction type "Мне нечего делать," which I would call NÉ-K construction. It turned out that each hypothesis focuses only on some specific stage(s) of the derivation (or evolution) of NÉ-K construction. NÉ-K construction, i.e., DAT―NÉ-K―BE―INF, has as its deep structure a complex S with main negative existential clause and subordinate infinitival clause. Each clause is provided with its own DAT discourse topic. Discourse topic of subordinate clause may be either PRO or K. Мне нечего делать. мнеi [neg [∃ [PROi [делать что]]]] Мне некому работать. мне [neg [∃ [кому [работать]]]] The above complex structure gradually transforms (or evolves) into a simple S with a single DAT discourse topic. Major rules applied for the full derivation of NÉ-K construction are as follows: PROi deletion, movement of interrogative K to the leftmost position, shift of K from interrogative to indefinite pronoun, GEN NEG rule, elimination of consonant clusters in front of K, incorporation of NE and K, addition of Ø to NE-K, metathesis of BE and K, and encliticization of BE. Peripheral constructions such as NE―BE―K or BE―NÉ-K found in colloquial Russian, and topicalized variants such as INF―BE―NÉ-K or NÉ-K―DAT―BE―INF can be derived from the same deep structure with the same rules but with slight modification or non-application of some rules. ЕСТЬ К construction can also be derived from the same deep structure with, of course, only the omission of NEG. During the course of derivation/evolution all elements of the construction suffer functional changes as follows; DAT: discourse topic of main clause within complex S > discourse topic of simple S K: interrogative ( > relative ) > indefinite pronoun > integration with NÉ- BE: existential > copula > enclitic, tense marker INF: predicate in subordinate clause > compliment of K > compliment (or less likely, subject) of NÉ-K.
참고문헌 (28)
- 이인영, "러시아어 존재문 연구 ―의미-화용적 접근", 러시아연구, 8(2), pp.95~157 (1998)
- 이인영, "러시아어 ‘여격 주어’구문 재고", 러시아연구, 17(1), pp.205~240 (2007), 러시아연구소
- 이인영, "소위 ‘소유 여격’에 대하여: 러시아어에서 소유형용사, 생격, У+생격 및 수혜 여격과의 비교", 러시아연구, 18(1), pp.187~218 (2008), 러시아연구소
- Галкина-Федорук, Е. М., "Безличные предложения в современном русском языке" (1958), Московского университета
- Гвоздев, А. Н., "Современный русский литератунрый язык, том 2: Синтаксис" (1973), Просвещение
- Георгиева, В. Л., "О природе и истории отрицательных конструкций типа <Нечего делать>, <Некуда идти> (в соотнесении с утвердительным)", Ученые записки Ленинградского государственного педагогического института, 45, pp.212~227 (1971)
- Исаченко, Александр В., "Грамматическийстрой русского языка в сопоста-влении с словацким: Морфология, часть первая" (1954), Изд. Словацкой академии наук
- Ломтев, Т. П., "Очерки по историческому синтаксису русского языка" (1956), Изд. Московского университета
- Мразек, Роман, "Славянский синтаксический тип 'Мне нечего читать'", Sborník prací filosofické fakulty Brněnské university, A(20), pp.97~105 (1972)
- Пешковский, А. М., "Русский синтаксис в научном освещении" (1928), Государственное учебно-педагогическое издательство
- Шахматов, А. А., "Синтаксис русского языка" (1927), Государственное учебно-педагогическое издательство
- Шведова, Н. Ю., "Грамматика современного русского языка" (1970), Наука
- Шведова, Н. Ю., "Русская грамматика, том II: Синтаксис" (1982), Наука
- Bailyn, John F., "The configurationality of case assignment in Russian", Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, pp.56~98 (1991)
- Chvany, Catherine V., "On the syntax of BE-sentences in Russian" (1975), Slavica Publishers, Inc.
- Forsyth, James, "A grammar of aspect" (1970), Cambridge University Press
- Fowler, George, "The syntax of the genitive case in Russian", 박사, pp.1987
- Garde, Paul, "Analyse de la tournure russe Mne nečego delat'", International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics, XXII, pp.43~60 (1976)
- Greenberg, Gerald Ruby, "The syntax and semantics of the Russian infinitive", 박사, pp.1985
- Greenberg, Gerald R., "Genitive of negation and infinitives as subjects in Russian", 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.105~115 (1987)
- Greenberg, Gerald R., "A parametric approach to dative subjects and the second dative in Slavic", Slavic and East European Journal, 35(1), pp.71~97 (1991)
- Kondrashova, Natalia, "Agreement and dative subjects in Russian", Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics, the MIT meeting, pp.255~285 (1993), Michigan Slavic Publications
- Moore, John, "What does it take to be a dative subject?", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18, pp.373~416 (2000)
- Neidle, Carol, "The role of case in Russian syntax" (1988), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Pesetsky, David M., "Paths and categories", 박사, pp.1982
- Rappaport, Gilbert C., "On a persistent problem of Russian syntax: Sentences of the type Mne negde spat'", Russian Linguistics, 10(1), pp.1~31 (1986)
- Schoorlemmer, Maaike, "Dative subjects in Russian in: Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics", pp.129~172 (1994), The Michigan Slavic Publications
- Veyrenc, Jacques, "Les propositions infinitives en russe" (1979), Institut d'Études slaves