본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국의 로비 제도 도입에 대한 이론적ㆍ경험적 연구

A Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Introduction of the Lobby System in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper aims at critically examining on the introduction of the American lobbying system into Korea. Theoretically, the lobby system has produced inequality in political power which places priority in organized interest groups such as business and labor. Importation of the lobby system to Korea would only act to expand inequality of power, when one considers the political access channel is severely inclined towards the social and economic power group. In the empirical context, it would be premature to introduce the lobbying system. The related groups and citizens have not yet received information, therefore there can not be public consensus or academic arguments. Viewed from the institutional context, the American lobbying system has been complementarily cooperated with PAC and Washington Representatives. Another aspects which must be take into accounts is our emotional attitudes which regard interest groups and lobbyists as selfish actors or vicious brokers. We can not expect the lobby system could firmly settle down in Korea. Given the aforementioned aspects, introduction of the American lobbying system must take into consideration our political, structural context and the more macro, long term perspectives

Abstract

This paper aims at critically examining on the introduction of the American lobbying system into Korea. Theoretically, the lobby system has produced inequality in political power which places priority in organized interest groups such as business and labor. Importation of the lobby system to Korea would only act to expand inequality of power, when one considers the political access channel is severely inclined towards the social and economic power group. In the empirical context, it would be premature to introduce the lobbying system. The related groups and citizens have not yet received information, therefore there can not be public consensus or academic arguments. Viewed from the institutional context, the American lobbying system has been complementarily cooperated with PAC and Washington Representatives. Another aspects which must be take into accounts is our emotional attitudes which regard interest groups and lobbyists as selfish actors or vicious brokers. We can not expect the lobby system could firmly settle down in Korea. Given the aforementioned aspects, introduction of the American lobbying system must take into consideration our political, structural context and the more macro, long term perspectives

참고문헌 (63)

  1. 강명세, "세계화와 탈산업화 시대의 노동과 복지의 정치" (2006), 한울아카데미
  2. 국회바른정치실천연구회, "외국대리인 로비활동 공개에 관한 법률" (2001), 토론회 자료집
  3. 도묘연, "이익집단의 이익표출활동과 재정후원의 관계:대구광역시 이익집단을 사례로", 대한정치학회보, 15(2), pp.177~202 (2007), 대한정치학회
  4. 로비제도연구회, "로비활동의 공개화에 관한 연구", ~ (2002)
  5. 문대현, "로비스트 제도 도입 방안" (2001), 국회사무처
  6. 박찬표, "한국 ‘정당민주화론’의 반성적 성찰:‘정당민주화’인가 ‘탈정당’인가?", 사회과학연구, 11, pp.137~166 (2003), 사회과학연구소
  7. 선학태, "갈등과 통합의 정치" (2004), 심산
  8. 신동면, "아일랜드 발전모델에 관한 연구: 경쟁력 조합주의와 사회협약", 한국정치학회보, 39(1), pp.299~324 (2005), 한국정치학회
  9. 이성규, "국회입법과정에서 이익집단의 역할변화에 관한 연구", 2006년도 국회연구용역과제
  10. 이승희, "로비스트 등록과 활동공개에 관한 법률을 제정하면서」, 『로비스트 법제화 꼭 필요한가』, 로비스트 법제화를 위한 제1차 토론회 (2005.5.14)", ~ (2005)
  11. 이우영, "한국의 로비활동 법제화 노력에 대한 입법학적 관점에서의 분석 ― “로비스트 등록 및 활동 공개에 관한 법률안”을 중심으로 ―", 서울대학교 법학, 46(3), pp.341~396 (2005), 법학연구소
  12. 이정희, "로비활동 제도화의 쟁점 연구", 21세기정치학회보, 16(3), pp.151~170 (2006), 21세기정치학회
  13. 이정희, "한국의 이익집단과 정당의 상호 연계구조", 21세기정치학회보, 12(2), pp.13~35 (2002), 21세기정치학회
  14. 정상호, "한국의 이익집단 연구의 분석적 개괄", 한국정치학회보, 40(1), pp.91~114 (2006), 한국정치학회
  15. 정상호, "한국과 일본의 정부 위원회 제도의 역할과 기능에 대한 비교 연구", 한국정치학회보, 37(5), pp.289~310 (2003), 한국정치학회
  16. 정진민, "후기 산업사회 정당정치와 한국의 정당발전" (1998), 한울
  17. 조승민, "로비의 제도화" (2005), 삼성경제연구소
  18. 조형제, "지역거버넌스와 사회적 합의 모델. 한반도사회경제연구회 지음 한반도 경제론" (2006), 창작과비평사
  19. 참여연대, "음성로비 근절을 위한 ‘로비활동공개법’의 올바른 입법방향 모색, 1차 토론회 자료집", ~ (2000)
  20. 최장집, "민주주의의 민주화" (2006), 후마니타스
  21. 최장집, "한국 정치의 제도개혁 - 한국 민주주의의 제도디자인 서설 -", 亞細亞 硏究, 46(4), pp.155~191 (2003), 아세아문제연구소
  22. 최장집, "민주화 이후의 민주주의" (2001), 후마니타스
  23. 최영진, "로비활동 법제화 논의에 관련하여, 로비스트 법제화 꼭 필요한가, 로비스트 법제화를 위한 제1차 토론회 자료집 (2005.5.14)", ~ (2005)
  24. 최태욱, "자유무역협정의 정치경제: 한국의 FTA 정책과 이익집단정치", 세계정치, pp.138~170 (2006), 서울대학교 국제문제연구소
  25. 한국자원봉사단체협의회, "한국자원봉사단체현황", ~ (2002)
  26. 韓相震, "韓國 利益集團의 實態와 改善方案: 經濟利益團體를 중심으로" (1985), 현대사회연구소
  27. Ainsworth,Scott H, "Analyzing Interest Politics:Group Influence on People and Policies" (2002), W.W.Norton & Company
  28. Baumgartner, Frank R, "Basic Interest" (1998), Princeton University Press
  29. Berry,Jeffrey M, "The New Liberalism:The Rising Power of Citizen Groups" (1999), Brookings Institution Press
  30. Berry, "Lobbying for the People" (1977), Princeton University Press
  31. Berry, "The Interest Group Society" (1984), Brown & Company
  32. Browne, William Paul, "Groups, Interests, and U.S. Public Policy" (1998), Georgetown University Press
  33. Crenson, Matthew A, "Downsizing Democracy: How America Sidelined Its Citizens and Privatized Its Public" (2002), The Johns Hopkins University Press
  34. Dahl, Robert A, "Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy" (1982), Yale University Press
  35. Gerber, Elizabeth R, "The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and The Promise of Direct Legislation" (1999), Prin-ceton Univ. Press
  36. Grady, Robert C, "Restoring Real Representation" (1993), University of Illinois Press
  37. Gray, Virginia, "The Population Ecology of Interest Representation" (1996), University of Michigan Press
  38. Herrson, Paul S, "Interest Groups, PACs, and Campaigns, The Interest Group Connection" (1998), Chatham House Publishers
  39. Hrebenar, "Burbank, Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Political Campaigns" (1999), Westview press
  40. Hula, Kevin W, "Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics" (1999), George Town University Press
  41. Im Hyug Baik, "From affiliation to association: The challenge of democratic consolidation in Korean industrial relations, Corporatism and Korean Capitalism" (1999), Routledge
  42. Judis, John B, "The Paradox of American Democracy: Elites, Special interests, and the Betrayal of Public Trust" (2001), Routledge
  43. Knoke, David, "Organizing for Collective Action" (1990), Aldine de Gruyter
  44. Kriesi, Hanspeter, "The Political opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization, The Politics of Social Protest" (1995), University of Minnesota Press
  45. Lindblom,Charles, "Woodhouse, The Policy Making Process" (1993), Prentice Hall
  46. Lowi, Theodore, "Decision Making vs. Policy Making: toward an Antidote for Technology.” Public Administration Review, May", June, 1970
  47. Mair, Peter, "Party System Change: Approach and Interpretation" (1997), Oxford University Press
  48. McFarland, Andrew S, "Interest Group and the Policy making Process: Source of Countervailing Power in America, The Politics of Interests: Interest Group Transformed" (1992), Westview Press
  49. Nownes, Robert Alexander Anthony, "Organized Interests and Direct Democracy in the States Paper Proposed for the 4th Annual Conference on State Politics and Policy" (2006), Kent State University
  50. O'Donnell R, "Partnership and Policy-making, Social Policy in Ireland: Principles, Practice and Problems" (1998), Oak tree Press
  51. Petracca,Mark P, "The Politics of Interests:Interest Group Transformed" (1992), Westview Press
  52. Rhodes, M, "The Political Economy of Social Pacts: ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform, The New Politics of the Welfare State" (2001), Oxford University Press
  53. Rodgers,Daniel T, "Contested Truths" (1987), Basic Books
  54. Salamon, Lester M, "Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector" (2004), Kumarian Press
  55. Salisbury, Robert H, "Interest Representation: The Dominance of Interest Groups", American Political Science Review, 78, pp.64~76 (1984)
  56. Salisbury,Robert.H, "Interests and Institutions:Substance and Structure in American Politics" (1992), University of Pitts-burgh Press
  57. Sartori,Giovanni, "Comparative Constitutional Engineering" (1994), Macmillan Press Ltd
  58. Schattschneider,E.E, "The Semisovereign People:A Realist’s View of Democracy in America" (1960), Harcourt School
  59. Schlozman, "Tierney, Organized Interests and American Democracy" (1986), Harper & Row Publishers
  60. Shaiko, Ronald G, "Lobbying in Washington: A Contemporary Pers-pective, The Interest Group Connection" (1998), Chatham House Publishers
  61. Streeck, Wolfgang, "Community, market, state-and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order.” Streeck and Schmitter. Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State (Sage Publi-cation. 1985)", ~ (1985)
  62. Walker, Jack L, "Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements" (1991), The University of Michigan Press
  63. Wilson,Graham K, "Only In America? The Politics Of The United States In Comparative Perspective", ~ (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)