본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Obama Administration’s Oligopolistic Shift: The Reciprocal Path-Dependence of the US Presidencies and the Interpretive Regime of the UN Charter

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper examines and evaluates the Obama Administration’s policy stance on the interpretive regime of the UN Charter, in comparison to previous administrations. Historically, the policy stance of U.S. administrations on the U.N. Charter can be roughly classified into three typologies: (1) oligopolistic (2) self-restraint, and (3) unilateral model. With regard to the potential conflict of Article 2(7) and Chapter 7, the framers of the UN Charter granted the supremacy of political will of P5 in the Security Council. However, some U.S. administrations were extremely cautious about a broad interpretation of the Charter 7 and even accepted the delegation of critical cases to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Moreover, some US administrations went far beyond the plain meaning of UN Charters and muddled through the opposition from other P5 members in crucial military operations. The Obama administration’s track-record of the UN Charter interpretive regime was not necessarily reconstructive.

Abstract

This paper examines and evaluates the Obama Administration’s policy stance on the interpretive regime of the UN Charter, in comparison to previous administrations. Historically, the policy stance of U.S. administrations on the U.N. Charter can be roughly classified into three typologies: (1) oligopolistic (2) self-restraint, and (3) unilateral model. With regard to the potential conflict of Article 2(7) and Chapter 7, the framers of the UN Charter granted the supremacy of political will of P5 in the Security Council. However, some U.S. administrations were extremely cautious about a broad interpretation of the Charter 7 and even accepted the delegation of critical cases to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Moreover, some US administrations went far beyond the plain meaning of UN Charters and muddled through the opposition from other P5 members in crucial military operations. The Obama administration’s track-record of the UN Charter interpretive regime was not necessarily reconstructive.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Balkin, Jack M., "What it Will Take for Barack Obama to Become the Next FDR", The Atlantic (2012)
  2. Baker, Peter, "Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria", New York Times, ~ (2013)
  3. BBC News, "Obama reaches out to Muslim world", ~ (2009)
  4. Breyer, Stephen, "Active Liberty: Interpreting our Democratic Constitution" (2010), Vintage
  5. Crook, John R., "Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law", American of International Law, 105(3), pp.568~611 (2011)
  6. Fassbender, Bardo, "The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36(1), pp.529~618 (1998)
  7. Henderson, Christian, "The 2010 United States National Security Strategy and the Obama Doctrine of Necessary Force", Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 15(3), pp.403~434 (2010)
  8. Gray, Christine, "International Law and the Use of Force" (2004), Oxford UP
  9. Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, "The Relationship Between the International Court of Justice and the Security Council in the Light of the Lockerbie Case", The American Journal of International Law, 88(4), pp.643~677 (1994)
  10. Hassouna, Hussein, "Arab League Reaction to Libyan Action", American Society of International Law Annual Meeting (2011)
  11. ICJ, "Advisory Opinion on Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia", Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276, ~ (1970)
  12. Ikenberry, John, "After Victory" (2001), Princeton UP
  13. Ken. Roberts, "Second-Guessing the Security Council: The International Court of Justice and Its Powers of Judicial Review", Pace International Law Review, 7(2), pp.281~ (1995)
  14. Koh, Harold Hongju, "The Obama Administration and International Law", Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law (2010)
  15. Krieg, Andreas, "Externalizing the Burden of War: the Obama Doctrine and US Foreign Policy in the Middle East", International Affairs, 92(1), pp.97~113 (2016)
  16. Kuperman, Alan J., "A Model Humanitarian Intervention?: Reassessing NATO’s Libya Campaign", International Security, 38(1), pp.105~136 (2013)
  17. Lizza, Ryan, "The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy: Insights and Evidence", pp.429~447 (2012), Rowman & Littlefield
  18. Lynch, Marc, "Obama’s World: Judging His Foreign Policy Record", Foreign Affairs (2015)
  19. Lee, Samsung, "The World and America: Reflection of the 20th Century and Prediction of the 21th Century" (2001), Hangilsa
  20. Krisch, Nico, "U.S. Foreign Policy:International Perspectives" (2003), Lynne Rienner
  21. Madison, James, "The Federalist Papers" (1961), Penguin
  22. Novkov, Julie, "The Supreme Court and the Presidency: Struggles for Supremacy" (2013), Sage
  23. "Nobel Lecture" (2009)[URL]
  24. Peltz, Stephen E., "A Taxonomy for American Diplomatic History", The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 19(1), pp.259~276 (1998)
  25. Putin, Vladimir V., "A Plea for Caution from Russia", New York Times, ~ (2013)
  26. Reisman, W. Michael, "American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays" (2005), Princeton UP
  27. Roberts, Adam, "NATO’s ‘Humanitarian War’ over Kosovo", Survival, 41(3), pp.102~123 (1999)
  28. Russell, Ruth B., "A History of the United Nations Charter: The Role of the United States 1940-1945" (1958), Brookings Institution
  29. Schlesinger, Stephen, "FDR’s Five Policemen: Creating the United Nations", World Policy Journal, 11(3), pp.88~93 (1994)
  30. Schulte, Constanze, "Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice" (2004), Oxford UP
  31. Skowronek, Stephen, "Presidential Leadership in Political Time: Reprise and Reappraisal" (2011), U of Kansas P
  32. Sparks, Donald L, "Namibia: The Nation After Independence" (1992), Westview
  33. Straszewski, Glen, "The Dumbing Down of Statutory Interpretation", Boston University Law Review, 95(4), pp.209~278 (2009)
  34. Thielbörger, Pierre, "The Status and Future of International Law after the Libya Goettingen", Journal of International Law, 4(1), pp.11~48 (2012)
  35. Watson, Geoffrey R., "Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and the World Court", Harvard International Law, 34(1), pp.1~46 (1993)
  36. White, G.Edward, "The Transformation of the Constitutional Regime of Foreign Relations", Virginia Law Review, 85(1), pp.1~150 (1999)
  37. "National Security Strategy" (2010)[URL]
  38. Whittington, Keith E., "Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, The Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History" (2007), Princeton UP
  39. Worsnip, Patrick, "U.N. looks for better times when Obama takes over", Reuters, ~ (2008)
  40. Yoo, John C., "Less than Bargained for: The Use of Force and the Declining Relevance of the United Nations", Chicago Journal of International Law, 5(2) (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)